A Warning from Canada: Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights

[PaintMyHouse]

US Law is irrelevant where the issue is Natural Law.

You wouldn't know natural law if I beat it into you...

 

[Lakhota]

Yeah, like we really should give a shit about Canada's social morals.

Report Says Canada's Residential Schools Committed Cultural Genocide Against Aboriginals

 

[boilermaker55]

Trying to have and intelligent conversation with someone with a shallow mind, of course I know there is no way to try that with you.

You sure don't seem to understand anything. So I have to let this go.And your snide remarks show the shallow mind you posses.

Must have been of some interest to you to make a post about it. So do is it your contention to advocate the idea by Canada? Or not?

Doesn't Canada have universal health care?
So you are advocating following their lead!

I'm advocating for not followingn Canada on this.

No American is advocating following Canada on this.

Look... I can see that you're a little slow and that's fine. But the article cited in the OP serves to warn AMERICANS of the decay that comes with decadence.

If you feel that this serves as a means to advocate degeneracy... Then you should limit your participation to the likes of the "FIRE HOT!" Forum.

LOL... Good for you. Know your limitations.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Marriage occurs in humanity...OKA: The element of nature withy the means to reason beyond Base instinct.

And now marriage occurs with one man and one man or one woman and one woman.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman. And that immutable Law of Nature would not be altered if every human being on the planet believed otherwise to the depths of their core. Humanity would simply suffer the consequences common to degeneracy, that's all.

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Marriage occurs in humanity...OKA: The element of nature withy the means to reason beyond Base instinct.

And now marriage occurs with one man and one man or one woman and one woman.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman. And that immutable Law of Nature would not be altered if every human being on the planet believed otherwise to the depths of their core. Humanity would simply suffer the consequences common to degeneracy, that's all.

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

Is the case and will always be the case...
Lol?

 

[Skylar]

Marriage occurs in humanity...OKA: The element of nature withy the means to reason beyond Base instinct.

And now marriage occurs with one man and one man or one woman and one woman.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman. And that immutable Law of Nature would not be altered if every human being on the planet believed otherwise to the depths of their core. Humanity would simply suffer the consequences common to degeneracy, that's all.

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

Is the case and will always be the case...
Lol?

Nope. And your perception won't even survive the month. To say nothing of infinity.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Marriage occurs in humanity...OKA: The element of nature withy the means to reason beyond Base instinct.

And now marriage occurs with one man and one man or one woman and one woman.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman. And that immutable Law of Nature would not be altered if every human being on the planet believed otherwise to the depths of their core. Humanity would simply suffer the consequences common to degeneracy, that's all.

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

Is the case and will always be the case...
Lol?

No matter how many times you lie about it, that is still bullshit.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Marriage occurs in humanity...OKA: The element of nature withy the means to reason beyond Base instinct.

And now marriage occurs with one man and one man or one woman and one woman.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman. And that immutable Law of Nature would not be altered if every human being on the planet believed otherwise to the depths of their core. Humanity would simply suffer the consequences common to degeneracy, that's all.

There is no 'immutable law of marriage'. That's just your imagination. And your imagination is irrelevant to our laws. Marriage is our creation. And as such it is what we say it is.

In 37 states, it includes one man and one man and one woman and one woman.

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

US Law is irrelevant where the issue is Natural Law.

The obvious problem with your argument being that there is no 'natural law of marriage'.

False. The Natural Law of Marriage is established by the standard nature established through its design of human physiology; wherein nature provided two distinct but complimenting genders, each respectively designed to join with the other.

Such represents the means by which civilization viably propagates.

Removing the standards that define marriage will continue the degeneration of western civilization with the consequences being catastrophic, within two generations.

As another natural law that stands above federal authority is "what one generation accepts, the next will embrace"... And what they will be embracing is the perversion common to unsound, unprincipled reason and that evil only produces chaos, calamity and catastrophe.

 

[Skylar]

False. The Natural Law of Marriage is established by the standard nature established through its design of human physiology; wherein nature provided two distinct but complimenting genders, each respectively designed to join with the other.

Obvious nonsense. You're describing fucking. Not marriage. You may not be able to tell the difference, but both society and a rational person could.

You've made up your fallacious 'natural law of marriage' from your own imagination. And your subjective fantasies have no relevance to our laws. Nor should.

Removing the standards that define marriage will continue the degeneration of western civilization with the consequences being catastrophic, within two generations.

Nope. These are just more of your bizarre personal fantasies. You can't rationally or factually establish any causation between gay marriage and your imaginary 'catastrophe'. You merely assume it. Your time line is arbitrary nonsense made up by you and citing only yourself.

Again, your fantasies are functionally irrelevant to this discussion. As they have no factual nor rational basis.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Removing the standards that define marriage will continue the degeneration of western civilization with the consequences being catastrophic, within two generations.

That has been said since Plato still had his ass on the ground, and the closest we every came to it was we people who think like you were in charge, during the Dark Ages.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

And it will always be the case, without regard to your ignorance of it being so.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

False. The Natural Law of Marriage is established by the standard nature established through its design of human physiology; wherein nature provided two distinct but complimenting genders, each respectively designed to join with the other.

Obvious nonsense. You're describing fucking.

I am stating what Marriage is as nature designed it.

You're fecklessly trying to deny the obvious... Because you lack the means to reason beyond your own subjective needs.

There's nothing I can do to help you with that... And there's nothing you can do to alter what Marriage is through your pitiful attempts to play house with your besties.

You hope that claiming yourself 'married' will finally bring you legitimacy... But it will not... Because the moment you claim yourself married outside of the standard that provide marrige the legitimacy you crave... You strip marriage of legitimacy.

The only way that you will ever be legitimate, is when you turn from illegitimacy... And no power on earth can do that for you, outside of you.

 

[Skylar]

I am stating what Marriage is as nature designed it.

There is no marriage in nature. Rendering your entire premise meaningless gibberish.

 

[Skylar]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is objectively meaningless.

Meanwhile, marriage includes a man and a man or a woman and a woman in 37 of 50 States. And in a matter of weeks, 50 of 50 States.

Ignore as you will. Your willful ignorance is gloriously irrelevant to the recognition of same sex marriage.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Removing the standards that define marriage will continue the degeneration of western civilization with the consequences being catastrophic, within two generations.

That has been said since Plato still had his ass on the ground, and the closest we every came to it was we people who think like you were in charge, during the Dark Ages.

Yes... Enlightenment was the result of rejecting natural principle that were celebrated and practiced in the dark ages.

Let the record reflect that the period OKA: The Dark Ages came as a direct consequence of the Rise of Islam and the rejection of any sense of natural principle.

(Now Reader, look around your world and see if you find any similarities in your world and the circumstances which brought on The Dark Ages.)

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is objectively meaningless.

Says me citing immutable natural law... Which is followed by you citing your own subjective needs, which are meaningless, in the objective light of natural law.

 

[Silhouette]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is objectively meaningless.

Says me citing immutable natural law... Which is followed by you citing your own subjective needs, which are meaningless, in the objective light of natural law.

And more importantly, if this is a cult as even experts are now agreeing it is: JOHNS HOPKINS CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY BEING TRANSGENDER IS A MENTAL DISORDER US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum then squelching any free speech opposition to it would be very Naziesque. Lest anyone forget, we are talking about behaviors here; not an innate/static state of being.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

And it will always be the case, without regard to your ignorance of it being so.

Claiming marriage has "always" been between one man and one woman is nonsensical. It is so obviously false that continuing to repeat it can only be called a LIE.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

And it will always be the case, without regard to your ignorance of it being so.

Claiming marriage has "always" been between one man and one woman is nonsensical. It is so obviously false that continuing to repeat it can only be called a LIE.

I'm not claiming "what marriage has always been".

I am stating what marriage "is"... And what
Marriage IS, is the Joining of One Man and One Woman... And this without regard to fickle nature of degenerates or the whimsy of pop culture.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Stop backpedaling, pisshead, you've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it!