A Warning from Canada: Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Stop backpedaling, pisshead, you've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it!

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 

[Katzndogz]

While the form of marriage has gone through some superficial changes, it was never between something other than men and women. People can call same sex telationships marriage but it is nothing more than a sop to make them feel better about being perverts.

 

[Skylar]

Removing the standards that define marriage will continue the degeneration of western civilization with the consequences being catastrophic, within two generations.

That has been said since Plato still had his ass on the ground, and the closest we every came to it was we people who think like you were in charge, during the Dark Ages.

Yes... Enlightenment was the result of rejecting natural principle that were celebrated and practiced in the dark ages.

Let the record reflect that the period OKA: The Dark Ages came as a direct consequence of the Rise of Islam and the rejection of any sense of natural principle.

Says who?

(Now Reader, look around your world and see if you find any similarities in your world and the circumstances which brought on The Dark Ages.)

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is objectively meaningless.

Says me citing immutable natural law... Which is followed by you citing your own subjective needs, which are meaningless, in the objective light of natural law.

There's no such natural law. As there's no marriage in nature. You're just citing your imagination.....which is objectively meaningless.

You're stuck, Keys.

 

[Skylar]

Stop backpedaling, pisshead, you've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it!

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

And in 37 States, one man and one man, or one woman and one woman.

Ignore all you like. Reality doesn't magically change just becuase its inconvenient to your arguments.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

There's no such natural law.

ROFLMNAO...

Relativism on PARADE!

(See how Relativism works Reader? All the Relativist needs is for humanity to not have been designed with two distinct but complimenting genders... Because that way, marriage would be meaningless and people of the same gender could then be married and absent the laws of nature that say otherwise, they could then be something akin to legitimate.)

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Stop backpedaling, pisshead, you've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it!

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

And in 37 States, one man and one man, or one woman and one woman.

Ignore all you like. Reality doesn't magically change just becuase its inconvenient to your arguments.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 

[Skylar]

Stop backpedaling, pisshead, you've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it!

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

And in 37 States, one man and one man, or one woman and one woman.

Ignore all you like. Reality doesn't magically change just becuase its inconvenient to your arguments.

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

And one man and one man. Or one woman and one woman. In 37 of 50 States now...and 50 of 50 States within a few weeks.

Remember, marriage is our invention. It is what we say it is. And we say it includes same sex couples.

You disagree. No one gives a shit, as we don't base the definition of marriage on whatever you believe.

 

[Skylar]

There's no such natural law.

ROFLMNAO...

Relativism on PARADE!

To you 'relativism' is anyone who doesn't accept your imagination as immutable fact. The obvious problem with that standard being that you citing you isn't an objective standard. And labeling your personal opinion 'nature' doesn't change the fact that its still just your subjective personal opinion.

Back in reality, there is no marriage in nature. Thus, there is no 'natural law of marriage'. You made it up. And your imagination is objectively meaningless.

You can't get around that.

 

[Skylar]

Not the case now, has never been the case. Anything ELSE you want to be wrong about today, kid?

It has always been the case and this without regard to the limitations which preclude you from seeing beyond your own subjective needs... to understand it.

Says you, citing yourself. Which is objectively meaningless.

Says me citing immutable natural law... Which is followed by you citing your own subjective needs, which are meaningless, in the objective light of natural law.

And more importantly, if this is a cult as even experts are now agreeing it is: JOHNS HOPKINS CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY BEING TRANSGENDER IS A MENTAL DISORDER US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum then squelching any free speech opposition to it would be very Naziesque. Lest anyone forget, we are talking about behaviors here; not an innate/static state of being.

Nazi'esque, huh? I don't think the nazi's wrote critical blog posts when they disagreed with someone. You may want to stop, dial back the melodrama, and reassess your over the top hyperbole. As its not doing much for your credibility.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Stop backpedaling, pisshead, you've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it!

Marriage is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

Dude, just stop. You've been cornered--you lied, you have been called on it! Marriage has NEVER, not for ONE MINUTE IN RECORDED HISTORY been only one man and one woman!

 

[Jarlaxle]

And more importantly, if this is a cult as even experts are now agreeing it is: JOHNS HOPKINS CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY BEING TRANSGENDER IS A MENTAL DISORDER US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum then squelching any free speech opposition to it would be very Naziesque. Lest anyone forget, we are talking about behaviors here; not an innate/static state of being.

Nazi'esque, huh? I don't think the nazi's wrote critical blog posts when they disagreed with someone. You may want to stop, dial back the melodrama, and reassess your over the top hyperbole. As its not doing much for your credibility.

Dude...Silly has NEVER had a shred of credibility here. She is a two-note troll, basically a human spambot.

 

[hazlnut]

Ran across this article which conveys what I have been saying about the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality Cult and what we should expect as a consequence of its effect on our culture, from people who have experienced the effects on theirs.

"Americans need to understand that the endgame of the LGBT rights movement involves centralized state power—and the end of First Amendment freedoms."

"I am the daughter of a gay father who died of AIDS. I described my experiences in my book: Out From Under: The Impact of Homosexual Parenting. Over fifty adult children who were raised by LGBT parents have communicated with me and share my concerns about same-sex marriage and parenting. Many of us struggle with our own sexuality and sense of gender because of the influences in our household environments growing up.

We have great compassion for people who struggle with their sexuality and gender identity—not animosity. And we love our parents. Yet, when we go public with our stories, we often face ostracism, silencing, and threats.

I want to warn America to expect severe erosion of First Amendment freedoms if the US Supreme Court mandates same-sex marriage. The consequences have played out in Canada for ten years now, and they are truly Orwellian in nature and scope. ... "

The Americans who are concerned about normalizing the mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy, should read the entire article, which you can find here:

A Warning from Canada Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights Public Discourse

It's evil... of the Old Testament variety and it will bring the same wrath to our time that it brought to the ancient people, destroying their cultures by the gross.

So, this one homophobic article represents all of Canada... what are you, fucking stupid?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ran across this article which conveys what I have been saying about the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality Cult and what we should expect as a consequence of its effect on our culture, from people who have experienced the effects on theirs.

"Americans need to understand that the endgame of the LGBT rights movement involves centralized state power—and the end of First Amendment freedoms."

"I am the daughter of a gay father who died of AIDS. I described my experiences in my book: Out From Under: The Impact of Homosexual Parenting. Over fifty adult children who were raised by LGBT parents have communicated with me and share my concerns about same-sex marriage and parenting. Many of us struggle with our own sexuality and sense of gender because of the influences in our household environments growing up.

We have great compassion for people who struggle with their sexuality and gender identity—not animosity. And we love our parents. Yet, when we go public with our stories, we often face ostracism, silencing, and threats.

I want to warn America to expect severe erosion of First Amendment freedoms if the US Supreme Court mandates same-sex marriage. The consequences have played out in Canada for ten years now, and they are truly Orwellian in nature and scope. ... "

The Americans who are concerned about normalizing the mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy, should read the entire article, which you can find here:

A Warning from Canada Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights Public Discourse

It's evil... of the Old Testament variety and it will bring the same wrath to our time that it brought to the ancient people, destroying their cultures by the gross.

So, this one homophobic article represents all of Canada... what are you, fucking stupid?

There's nothing irrational about noting the undeniable facts... there IS however a direct connection to denying undeniable fact and irrational.

That you're in here crying using words with no basis in reality, resting in absolutely nothing but the subjective need or the sexually deviant, is incontestable evidence that YOU and your would-be 'Cause' are nothing short of irrational.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

And more importantly, if this is a cult as even experts are now agreeing it is: JOHNS HOPKINS CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY BEING TRANSGENDER IS A MENTAL DISORDER US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum then squelching any free speech opposition to it would be very Naziesque. Lest anyone forget, we are talking about behaviors here; not an innate/static state of being.

Nazi'esque, huh? I don't think the nazi's wrote critical blog posts when they disagreed with someone. You may want to stop, dial back the melodrama, and reassess your over the top hyperbole. As its not doing much for your credibility.

Dude...Silly has NEVER had a shred of credibility here. She is a two-note troll, basically a human spambot.

Ahh... as concessions go, THAT was FANTASTIC. (And in every sense of the word.)

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

To you 'relativism' is

Relativism is the doctrine which holds that knowledge, truth, and morality exist only in relation to one's cultural, societal, historical and personal context, and, as such can never be the result of soundly reasoned absolutes.

It is through this perversion of reason wherein relativism axiomatically rejects the objectivity that is essential to truth.

And with truth being essential to trust and, both of those being critical to the establishment of a soundly reasoned morality, and because a soundly reasoned morality is essential to Justice... it becomes clear to reasonable people, that Relativism can never serve justice.

Thus the reason that the Article in the OP points to the injustice common to the Cult Advocating to Normalize Sexual Abnormality and the basis of the warning the Author is offering Americans.

What she is saying is that you people are mentally disturbed... irrational and incapable of honesty, thus unworthy of the trust on any level.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Ran across this article which conveys what I have been saying about the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality Cult and what we should expect as a consequence of its effect on our culture, from people who have experienced the effects on theirs.

"Americans need to understand that the endgame of the LGBT rights movement involves centralized state power—and the end of First Amendment freedoms."

"I am the daughter of a gay father who died of AIDS. I described my experiences in my book: Out From Under: The Impact of Homosexual Parenting. Over fifty adult children who were raised by LGBT parents have communicated with me and share my concerns about same-sex marriage and parenting. Many of us struggle with our own sexuality and sense of gender because of the influences in our household environments growing up.

We have great compassion for people who struggle with their sexuality and gender identity—not animosity. And we love our parents. Yet, when we go public with our stories, we often face ostracism, silencing, and threats.

I want to warn America to expect severe erosion of First Amendment freedoms if the US Supreme Court mandates same-sex marriage. The consequences have played out in Canada for ten years now, and they are truly Orwellian in nature and scope. ... "

The Americans who are concerned about normalizing the mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy, should read the entire article, which you can find here:

A Warning from Canada Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights Public Discourse

It's evil... of the Old Testament variety and it will bring the same wrath to our time that it brought to the ancient people, destroying their cultures by the gross.

Being raised by gay parents doesn't mean you're going to be gay-friendly. Just as every gay person came from straight parents. But at the same time, this only illustrates how having gay parents doesn't give you any extra credibility either. You're still just a hater hating for no sensible reason.

Do children of smokers who die of cancer all then oppose smoking? Do those whose parents die having been in car accidents advocate for seat belt laws, lower speed limits, etc.?

Sorry you got made fun of in school, but an adult moves on.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ran across this article which conveys what I have been saying about the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality Cult and what we should expect as a consequence of its effect on our culture, from people who have experienced the effects on theirs.

"Americans need to understand that the endgame of the LGBT rights movement involves centralized state power—and the end of First Amendment freedoms."

"I am the daughter of a gay father who died of AIDS. I described my experiences in my book: Out From Under: The Impact of Homosexual Parenting. Over fifty adult children who were raised by LGBT parents have communicated with me and share my concerns about same-sex marriage and parenting. Many of us struggle with our own sexuality and sense of gender because of the influences in our household environments growing up.

We have great compassion for people who struggle with their sexuality and gender identity—not animosity. And we love our parents. Yet, when we go public with our stories, we often face ostracism, silencing, and threats.

I want to warn America to expect severe erosion of First Amendment freedoms if the US Supreme Court mandates same-sex marriage. The consequences have played out in Canada for ten years now, and they are truly Orwellian in nature and scope. ... "

The Americans who are concerned about normalizing the mental disorder that presents sexual deviancy, should read the entire article, which you can find here:

A Warning from Canada Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights Public Discourse

It's evil... of the Old Testament variety and it will bring the same wrath to our time that it brought to the ancient people, destroying their cultures by the gross.

Being raised by gay parents doesn't mean you're going to be gay-friendly.

So true... and if that in ANY WAY was relevant to ANYTHING. MAN! Would that be a great point.

There's no potential virtue in claiming that a contest of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality is equates to being 'unfriendly' toward the Sexually Abnormal.

The Author is stating her experience... she is stating such as a means to warn others of the consequences realized in her country, which those in other countries would reasonably like to know if they want to avoid those highly unenviable consequences. That's a fair sign of being "FRIENDLY" to reason... and reason is essential to a viable civilization.

There's nothing complex about any of this...

Homosexuality has been with the human species since there has been a human species... IF Homosexuality was conducive to 'REASON'; wherein homosexuals were prone toward 'getting along with others'... then homosexuality would not be a 'thing' at all... such people would just be 'Bill, Tom, Shiela and Sandy'.

But that's not what happened is it?

There's a clue in there somewhere, and if it helps, it's a 900lb gorilla sitting right on top. Read this thread and the 500 others just like it on this site alone, and 10s of thousands of other threads on dozens of other sites like this one.

Go find me the 'soundly reasoned' homosexuals. You'll find them contesting the idiocy that institutions designed SPECIFICALLY FOR NON-HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD BE FORCED TO PROVIDE FOR HOMOSEXUALS.

The count right now is -3-... .

Now, where a group is comprised of 6,000,000 people, in a nation of 300,000,000, and 3 are reasonable...

THAT is a sign that the cult is NOT-Reasonable.

Now what do cultures do with unreasonable cults?

Do the math...

Now when you've finished that, we'll see who is unfriendly toward the homosexual... those here to debate them, toward the goal of proving in unavoidable terms that their position is absurd, so that they can HELP THEMSELVES BEFORE CATASTROPHE COMES TO THEM... or those who reject the obvious and drive them toward their own destruction.

There's absolutely nothing complex about ANY of this.

And here's the best part. All of the support that we're told they enjoy... is fabricated. The polls showing 60-70-80-90% approval, are lies.

The "Groups" who are standing up for "GAY-RIGHTS" are hollow little sub-cults of a few people using fabricated aliases by the thousands to fill out web polls to make it LOOK like homosexuals make up 30% of the population. At BEST homosexuality comprises 2% of the population, with the innumerable facets of the "Shades of Ghey", rounding off to perhaps 1 additional percentage point.

Botton line: the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality, IS A LIE!... from soup to socialists.

But such is the nature of Evil, isn't it?

Which... for those keeping score, that's another clue.

 

[Silhouette]

And more importantly, if this is a cult as even experts are now agreeing it is: JOHNS HOPKINS CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY BEING TRANSGENDER IS A MENTAL DISORDER US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum then squelching any free speech opposition to it would be very Naziesque. Lest anyone forget, we are talking about behaviors here; not an innate/static state of being.

Nazi'esque, huh? I don't think the nazi's wrote critical blog posts when they disagreed with someone. You may want to stop, dial back the melodrama, and reassess your over the top hyperbole. As its not doing much for your credibility.

Dude...Silly has NEVER had a shred of credibility here. She is a two-note troll, basically a human spambot.

Is that why you feel you have to try to keep hammering that belief of yours home to others? Not so sure on the face of it I lack credibility, so you feel compelled to have an army whittle away at it daily? Seems your lack of confidence in your perception of my credibility is seeping through the cracks of your actions..

 

[Jarlaxle]

I'm not "hammering" anything, Silly. I am pointing and laughing at you! You're the crazy fuck running around with a pair of Depends on your head while squeaking, "the end is coming!" You and Keys are like watching two people trying to play Tetherball while drunk.

 

[Jarlaxle]

And more importantly, if this is a cult as even experts are now agreeing it is: JOHNS HOPKINS CHIEF OF PSYCHIATRY BEING TRANSGENDER IS A MENTAL DISORDER US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum then squelching any free speech opposition to it would be very Naziesque. Lest anyone forget, we are talking about behaviors here; not an innate/static state of being.

Nazi'esque, huh? I don't think the nazi's wrote critical blog posts when they disagreed with someone. You may want to stop, dial back the melodrama, and reassess your over the top hyperbole. As its not doing much for your credibility.

Dude...Silly has NEVER had a shred of credibility here. She is a two-note troll, basically a human spambot.

Ahh... as concessions go, THAT was FANTASTIC. (And in every sense of the word.)

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

You delusions are duly noted and, as usual, laughed at.

You were caught in a lie, called on it, and ran like the pussy you are.