A Year Ago Today Trump Won – Here's What He's Accomplished!

So, he got a guy on the SCOTUS. The rest of that is just hype and no action.

Oh, and do not forget that job creation has slowed down under Trump. 48 months prior to Trump the average number of new jobs was 214,000 per month. Under Since Jan that number has dropped to 169,000 per month on average.

So would you rather see higher job growth with higher job losses and low quality jobs created, or quality jobs with less loss even though lower numbers? From FactCheck.org:

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that 805,000 manufacturing jobs have been created since President Barack Obama has been in office. In fact, there has been a net loss of 303,000 manufacturing jobs since January 2009.

Earnest made the statement during a press briefing on Nov. 30. Carrier, a heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration company, earlier that day had announced a deal with President-elect Donald Trump so that the company would “continue to manufacture gas furnaces in Indianapolis, in addition to retaining engineering and headquarters staff, preserving more than 1,000 jobs.”

Earnest called the announcement “good news,” but claimed that Trump would have to make another 804 deals like that to equal the number of manufacturing jobs created while Obama has been president.


Obama's Record on Manufacturing Jobs - FactCheck.org

Job growth is a very misleading number taken on it's own. There are many other economic factors that play into a good economy. For instance, government dependency. Government dependency shrank very little since it's high that was created under Obama. If all these wonderful jobs Obama created were quality jobs, government dependency would have gone way down.

View attachment 159863

The only reason food stamp usage went down as much as it did was because of Republican controlled states that instituted requirements to collect such as they did in Maine.

Labor participation rate is another. Labor participation rate plunged under Obama and continued throughout his two terms:

View attachment 159867

Even median household income would reflect a great economy. But under Obama's job growth, it didn't even reach the point it was at before he became President:


View attachment 159868

It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

Yes the LATimes a far left hack site and you far left drones believe it without question or hesitation. Yes I know it is repeat through out the far left hack sites.

Then again anything that keeps people off the government rolls will cause you to disagree with it.

No matter how the far left spins this, Trump did save jobs there as the plant was going to close and move to Mexico.

See how the far left will deny reality?

They can not stand that these people will have jobs and not be part of the government welfare system.
 
So, he got a guy on the SCOTUS. The rest of that is just hype and no action.

Oh, and do not forget that job creation has slowed down under Trump. 48 months prior to Trump the average number of new jobs was 214,000 per month. Under Since Jan that number has dropped to 169,000 per month on average.

So would you rather see higher job growth with higher job losses and low quality jobs created, or quality jobs with less loss even though lower numbers? From FactCheck.org:

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that 805,000 manufacturing jobs have been created since President Barack Obama has been in office. In fact, there has been a net loss of 303,000 manufacturing jobs since January 2009.

Earnest made the statement during a press briefing on Nov. 30. Carrier, a heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration company, earlier that day had announced a deal with President-elect Donald Trump so that the company would “continue to manufacture gas furnaces in Indianapolis, in addition to retaining engineering and headquarters staff, preserving more than 1,000 jobs.”

Earnest called the announcement “good news,” but claimed that Trump would have to make another 804 deals like that to equal the number of manufacturing jobs created while Obama has been president.


Obama's Record on Manufacturing Jobs - FactCheck.org

Job growth is a very misleading number taken on it's own. There are many other economic factors that play into a good economy. For instance, government dependency. Government dependency shrank very little since it's high that was created under Obama. If all these wonderful jobs Obama created were quality jobs, government dependency would have gone way down.

View attachment 159863

The only reason food stamp usage went down as much as it did was because of Republican controlled states that instituted requirements to collect such as they did in Maine.

Labor participation rate is another. Labor participation rate plunged under Obama and continued throughout his two terms:

View attachment 159867

Even median household income would reflect a great economy. But under Obama's job growth, it didn't even reach the point it was at before he became President:


View attachment 159868

It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.
 
So, he got a guy on the SCOTUS. The rest of that is just hype and no action.

Oh, and do not forget that job creation has slowed down under Trump. 48 months prior to Trump the average number of new jobs was 214,000 per month. Under Since Jan that number has dropped to 169,000 per month on average.

So would you rather see higher job growth with higher job losses and low quality jobs created, or quality jobs with less loss even though lower numbers? From FactCheck.org:

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that 805,000 manufacturing jobs have been created since President Barack Obama has been in office. In fact, there has been a net loss of 303,000 manufacturing jobs since January 2009.

Earnest made the statement during a press briefing on Nov. 30. Carrier, a heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration company, earlier that day had announced a deal with President-elect Donald Trump so that the company would “continue to manufacture gas furnaces in Indianapolis, in addition to retaining engineering and headquarters staff, preserving more than 1,000 jobs.”

Earnest called the announcement “good news,” but claimed that Trump would have to make another 804 deals like that to equal the number of manufacturing jobs created while Obama has been president.


Obama's Record on Manufacturing Jobs - FactCheck.org

Job growth is a very misleading number taken on it's own. There are many other economic factors that play into a good economy. For instance, government dependency. Government dependency shrank very little since it's high that was created under Obama. If all these wonderful jobs Obama created were quality jobs, government dependency would have gone way down.

View attachment 159863

The only reason food stamp usage went down as much as it did was because of Republican controlled states that instituted requirements to collect such as they did in Maine.

Labor participation rate is another. Labor participation rate plunged under Obama and continued throughout his two terms:

View attachment 159867

Even median household income would reflect a great economy. But under Obama's job growth, it didn't even reach the point it was at before he became President:


View attachment 159868

It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.

:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.
 
Hey, Obama sucked, that is for sure. But nothing has changed in that aspect, the guy in the White House now sucks too.

And you know that after only 10 months? Unemployment the lowest since 2000. Same with consumer confidence which is a leading indicator of future economic growth. Tax reform is currently in the works with a reduced corporation tax that puts us closer to that of our competitors in other countries.

This is much more than "hype and no action." This is action.
Thanks in large part to Obama, who handed Trump a 4.8% unemployment rate along with a growing job market.
 
So, he got a guy on the SCOTUS. The rest of that is just hype and no action.

Oh, and do not forget that job creation has slowed down under Trump. 48 months prior to Trump the average number of new jobs was 214,000 per month. Under Since Jan that number has dropped to 169,000 per month on average.

So would you rather see higher job growth with higher job losses and low quality jobs created, or quality jobs with less loss even though lower numbers? From FactCheck.org:

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that 805,000 manufacturing jobs have been created since President Barack Obama has been in office. In fact, there has been a net loss of 303,000 manufacturing jobs since January 2009.

Earnest made the statement during a press briefing on Nov. 30. Carrier, a heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration company, earlier that day had announced a deal with President-elect Donald Trump so that the company would “continue to manufacture gas furnaces in Indianapolis, in addition to retaining engineering and headquarters staff, preserving more than 1,000 jobs.”

Earnest called the announcement “good news,” but claimed that Trump would have to make another 804 deals like that to equal the number of manufacturing jobs created while Obama has been president.


Obama's Record on Manufacturing Jobs - FactCheck.org

Job growth is a very misleading number taken on it's own. There are many other economic factors that play into a good economy. For instance, government dependency. Government dependency shrank very little since it's high that was created under Obama. If all these wonderful jobs Obama created were quality jobs, government dependency would have gone way down.

View attachment 159863

The only reason food stamp usage went down as much as it did was because of Republican controlled states that instituted requirements to collect such as they did in Maine.

Labor participation rate is another. Labor participation rate plunged under Obama and continued throughout his two terms:

View attachment 159867

Even median household income would reflect a great economy. But under Obama's job growth, it didn't even reach the point it was at before he became President:


View attachment 159868

It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.

:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????
 
Hey, Obama sucked, that is for sure. But nothing has changed in that aspect, the guy in the White House now sucks too.

And you know that after only 10 months? Unemployment the lowest since 2000. Same with consumer confidence which is a leading indicator of future economic growth. Tax reform is currently in the works with a reduced corporation tax that puts us closer to that of our competitors in other countries.

This is much more than "hype and no action." This is action.
Thanks in large part to Obama, who handed Trump a 4.8% unemployment rate along with a growing job market.

And the far left proves they will deny reality in order to push their debunked far left religious narratives!

Notice how company's are now wanting to build in the US instead of foreign nations and the far left sees that as a bad thing!
 
So, he got a guy on the SCOTUS. The rest of that is just hype and no action.

Oh, and do not forget that job creation has slowed down under Trump. 48 months prior to Trump the average number of new jobs was 214,000 per month. Under Since Jan that number has dropped to 169,000 per month on average.

So would you rather see higher job growth with higher job losses and low quality jobs created, or quality jobs with less loss even though lower numbers? From FactCheck.org:

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that 805,000 manufacturing jobs have been created since President Barack Obama has been in office. In fact, there has been a net loss of 303,000 manufacturing jobs since January 2009.

Earnest made the statement during a press briefing on Nov. 30. Carrier, a heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration company, earlier that day had announced a deal with President-elect Donald Trump so that the company would “continue to manufacture gas furnaces in Indianapolis, in addition to retaining engineering and headquarters staff, preserving more than 1,000 jobs.”

Earnest called the announcement “good news,” but claimed that Trump would have to make another 804 deals like that to equal the number of manufacturing jobs created while Obama has been president.


Obama's Record on Manufacturing Jobs - FactCheck.org

Job growth is a very misleading number taken on it's own. There are many other economic factors that play into a good economy. For instance, government dependency. Government dependency shrank very little since it's high that was created under Obama. If all these wonderful jobs Obama created were quality jobs, government dependency would have gone way down.

View attachment 159863

The only reason food stamp usage went down as much as it did was because of Republican controlled states that instituted requirements to collect such as they did in Maine.

Labor participation rate is another. Labor participation rate plunged under Obama and continued throughout his two terms:

View attachment 159867

Even median household income would reflect a great economy. But under Obama's job growth, it didn't even reach the point it was at before he became President:


View attachment 159868

It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.

:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????

25,000 imaginary hypothetical jobs = 0 actual jobs.

0 - 545 = -545.

-545 - 636 = -1181

Carrier just opened a brand-new plant in Mexico.
 
Hey, Obama sucked, that is for sure. But nothing has changed in that aspect, the guy in the White House now sucks too.

And you know that after only 10 months? Unemployment the lowest since 2000. Same with consumer confidence which is a leading indicator of future economic growth. Tax reform is currently in the works with a reduced corporation tax that puts us closer to that of our competitors in other countries.

This is much more than "hype and no action." This is action.
Thanks in large part to Obama, who handed Trump a 4.8% unemployment rate along with a growing job market.

Correct. DumBama hasn't been in office for nearly a year, and now all good things happening is because of him.

Question: How much longer will you try to credit DumBama with Trumps' success? 2 years, 3 years, 5 years? I certainly hope it's not the same amount of time you on the left blamed Bush for all his F-ups.
 
So would you rather see higher job growth with higher job losses and low quality jobs created, or quality jobs with less loss even though lower numbers? From FactCheck.org:

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said that 805,000 manufacturing jobs have been created since President Barack Obama has been in office. In fact, there has been a net loss of 303,000 manufacturing jobs since January 2009.

Earnest made the statement during a press briefing on Nov. 30. Carrier, a heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration company, earlier that day had announced a deal with President-elect Donald Trump so that the company would “continue to manufacture gas furnaces in Indianapolis, in addition to retaining engineering and headquarters staff, preserving more than 1,000 jobs.”

Earnest called the announcement “good news,” but claimed that Trump would have to make another 804 deals like that to equal the number of manufacturing jobs created while Obama has been president.


Obama's Record on Manufacturing Jobs - FactCheck.org

Job growth is a very misleading number taken on it's own. There are many other economic factors that play into a good economy. For instance, government dependency. Government dependency shrank very little since it's high that was created under Obama. If all these wonderful jobs Obama created were quality jobs, government dependency would have gone way down.

View attachment 159863

The only reason food stamp usage went down as much as it did was because of Republican controlled states that instituted requirements to collect such as they did in Maine.

Labor participation rate is another. Labor participation rate plunged under Obama and continued throughout his two terms:

View attachment 159867

Even median household income would reflect a great economy. But under Obama's job growth, it didn't even reach the point it was at before he became President:


View attachment 159868

It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.

:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????

25,000 imaginary hypothetical jobs = 0 actual jobs.

0 - 545 = -545.

-545 - 636 = -1181

Carrier just opened a brand-new plant in Mexico.

What are you going to say when those hypothetical jobs become real jobs? But forget all that. Carrier is keeping over half of their crew here in the US.
 
Hey, Obama sucked, that is for sure. But nothing has changed in that aspect, the guy in the White House now sucks too.

And you know that after only 10 months? Unemployment the lowest since 2000. Same with consumer confidence which is a leading indicator of future economic growth. Tax reform is currently in the works with a reduced corporation tax that puts us closer to that of our competitors in other countries.

This is much more than "hype and no action." This is action.
Thanks in large part to Obama, who handed Trump a 4.8% unemployment rate along with a growing job market.

Correct. DumBama hasn't been in office for nearly a year, and now all good things happening is because of him.

Question: How much longer will you try to credit DumBama with Trumps' success? 2 years, 3 years, 5 years? I certainly hope it's not the same amount of time you on the left blamed Bush for all his F-ups.
No, just the first year, since the economy doesn’t turn on a dime and we were still operating under Obama’s budget until the end of September. Just like I gave credit of the economy to Bush during Obama’s first year.
 
Hey, Obama sucked, that is for sure. But nothing has changed in that aspect, the guy in the White House now sucks too.

And you know that after only 10 months? Unemployment the lowest since 2000. Same with consumer confidence which is a leading indicator of future economic growth. Tax reform is currently in the works with a reduced corporation tax that puts us closer to that of our competitors in other countries.

This is much more than "hype and no action." This is action.
Thanks in large part to Obama, who handed Trump a 4.8% unemployment rate along with a growing job market.

Correct. DumBama hasn't been in office for nearly a year, and now all good things happening is because of him.

Question: How much longer will you try to credit DumBama with Trumps' success? 2 years, 3 years, 5 years? I certainly hope it's not the same amount of time you on the left blamed Bush for all his F-ups.
No, just the first year, since the economy doesn’t turn on a dime and we were still operating under Obama’s budget until the end of September. Just like I gave credit of the economy to Bush during Obama’s first year.

Oh.......I'm sure you did. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
 
It is pretty funny that you mention Carrier.

Do you know how that worked out?

Layoffs at Carrier start soon, targeting some of the jobs Trump vowed to save

I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.

:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????

25,000 imaginary hypothetical jobs = 0 actual jobs.

0 - 545 = -545.

-545 - 636 = -1181

Carrier just opened a brand-new plant in Mexico.

What are you going to say when those hypothetical jobs become real jobs? But forget all that. Carrier is keeping over half of their crew here in the US.

:lol:

Of course. You'll have the last laugh, as soon as that 10 million wire transfer comes in from that Nigerian Prince.
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average 10/26 - 11/9 -- 38.3 56.9 -18.6
Gallup 11/7 - 11/9 1500 A 37 58 -21
Rasmussen Reports 11/7 - 11/9 1500 LV 44 55 -11
Economist/YouGov 11/5 - 11/7 1336 RV 40 55 -15
Reuters/Ipsos 11/3 - 11/7 1572 A 35 60 -25
CNN 11/2 - 11/5 RV 38 57 -19
IBD/TIPP 10/26 - 11/3 917 A 36 58 -22
ABC News/Wash Post 10/29 - 11/1 884 RV 38 58 -20
CBS News 10/27 - 10/30 1109 A 39 55 -16
PPP (D) 10/27 - 10/29 572 RV 38 56 -18
All President Trump Job Approval Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Well now, a lot more people are seeing the treasonous fat senile old orange clown for what he is. Seeing more and more -20+ spreads as the clown continues to crash and burn. And the whole of the GOP is going down right along with him.
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average 10/26 - 11/9 -- 38.3 56.9 -18.6
Gallup 11/7 - 11/9 1500 A 37 58 -21
Rasmussen Reports 11/7 - 11/9 1500 LV 44 55 -11
Economist/YouGov 11/5 - 11/7 1336 RV 40 55 -15
Reuters/Ipsos 11/3 - 11/7 1572 A 35 60 -25
CNN 11/2 - 11/5 RV 38 57 -19
IBD/TIPP 10/26 - 11/3 917 A 36 58 -22
ABC News/Wash Post 10/29 - 11/1 884 RV 38 58 -20
CBS News 10/27 - 10/30 1109 A 39 55 -16
PPP (D) 10/27 - 10/29 572 RV 38 56 -18
All President Trump Job Approval Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Well now, a lot more people are seeing the treasonous fat senile old orange clown for what he is. Seeing more and more -20+ spreads as the clown continues to crash and burn. And the whole of the GOP is going down right along with him.

I guess you're right. He's in real trouble now:

Analysis | 12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample Approve Disapprove Spread
RCP Average 10/26 - 11/9 -- 38.3 56.9 -18.6
Gallup 11/7 - 11/9 1500 A 37 58 -21
Rasmussen Reports 11/7 - 11/9 1500 LV 44 55 -11
Economist/YouGov 11/5 - 11/7 1336 RV 40 55 -15
Reuters/Ipsos 11/3 - 11/7 1572 A 35 60 -25
CNN 11/2 - 11/5 RV 38 57 -19
IBD/TIPP 10/26 - 11/3 917 A 36 58 -22
ABC News/Wash Post 10/29 - 11/1 884 RV 38 58 -20
CBS News 10/27 - 10/30 1109 A 39 55 -16
PPP (D) 10/27 - 10/29 572 RV 38 56 -18
All President Trump Job Approval Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Well now, a lot more people are seeing the treasonous fat senile old orange clown for what he is. Seeing more and more -20+ spreads as the clown continues to crash and burn. And the whole of the GOP is going down right along with him.

I guess you're right. He's in real trouble now:

Analysis | 12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

You know that Trump isn't going to be running against Hillary Clinton next time, right?
 
I didn't mention anything. I simply copy/ pasted from the article. However I would rather have a President that''s trying to bring back or save jobs than one that tried to destroy them.

:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????

25,000 imaginary hypothetical jobs = 0 actual jobs.

0 - 545 = -545.

-545 - 636 = -1181

Carrier just opened a brand-new plant in Mexico.

What are you going to say when those hypothetical jobs become real jobs? But forget all that. Carrier is keeping over half of their crew here in the US.

:lol:

Of course. You'll have the last laugh, as soon as that 10 million wire transfer comes in from that Nigerian Prince.

Hey, I'm confident. Things are going our way. I think you guys are the ones that have to watch out. Another election is just around the corner.
 
:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????

25,000 imaginary hypothetical jobs = 0 actual jobs.

0 - 545 = -545.

-545 - 636 = -1181

Carrier just opened a brand-new plant in Mexico.

What are you going to say when those hypothetical jobs become real jobs? But forget all that. Carrier is keeping over half of their crew here in the US.

:lol:

Of course. You'll have the last laugh, as soon as that 10 million wire transfer comes in from that Nigerian Prince.

Hey, I'm confident. Things are going our way. I think you guys are the ones that have to watch out. Another election is just around the corner.

:lol:

You keep that faith alive!
 
:lol:

Did you bother to read what you copy and pasted?

Of course you didn't.

Sure I did, and allow me to copy and paste once again:

Carrier Corp. says a round of layoffs that had been scheduled for December 22 has been pushed to January. The company, citing rising demand and attrition, tells Inside INdiana Business the previously-announced cut of 290 positions has been reduced to 215.

A round of nearly 340 workers were let go in July as part of high-profile plans that included outsourcing some work performed at the Indianapolis campus to Mexico and a $16 million investment touted by then-President-Elect Donald Trump that involves making Indianapolis a gas furnace production Center of Excellence. The Indiana Economic Development Corp. in March pledged an incentive package totaling $7 million to Carrier, which says it will retain 1,000 jobs in the city, 800 of which had previously been slated to be cut due to outsourcing.

As part of our previously announced plans to relocate fan coil manufacturing production lines from Indianapolis, approximately 215 employees will leave Carrier on Jan. 11, 2018. This is a change from the previously announced date in December.

More than 1,100 jobs remain at the Indianapolis facility in keeping with our 2016 commitment. Jan. 11 is the final separation date for employees impacted by the fan coil manufacturing transition. Fewer employees than expected have been impacted due to attrition.

United Technologies, Carrier’s parent company, announced in June that over the next three years it expects to hire nearly 25,000 people in the U.S., of which more than 5,000 new positions will be created in support of the company’s innovative new products.


Carrier: Demand Drives Layoff Delay

I'm not good at math, so perhaps you can help. What is 25,000 minus 545?????

25,000 imaginary hypothetical jobs = 0 actual jobs.

0 - 545 = -545.

-545 - 636 = -1181

Carrier just opened a brand-new plant in Mexico.

What are you going to say when those hypothetical jobs become real jobs? But forget all that. Carrier is keeping over half of their crew here in the US.

:lol:

Of course. You'll have the last laugh, as soon as that 10 million wire transfer comes in from that Nigerian Prince.

Hey, I'm confident. Things are going our way. I think you guys are the ones that have to watch out. Another election is just around the corner.
Mid-terms rarely go well for the president’s party.
 

Forum List

Back
Top