ABC moderators slammed for their pathetic bias.

[Arlette]

Kommiela lied repeatedly, which has been documented in this thread.

Try posting just onc without lying you KKKanadian vermin shit.

Nobody cares. Trumpy fell for an Internet hoax.

 

[BackAgain]

Trump won’t say he will veto it.

Trump Won’t Commit To Vetoing National Abortion Ban In Debate

Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, said last month that Trump would veto a national abortion ban.

www.forbes.com

No such bill will ever be sent to the White House.

 

[Marener]

He was talking about the two disputing sides regarding the removal of statues.

You truly can’t stop lying.

He was talking about the two sides at Charlottesville that day. One side was there to attend a white supremacist rally.

 

[BackAgain]

How does that change the fact that Facebook decided what to take down?

Under pressure. And acquiescing to it warranted an apology.

How difficult is it for you to follow along, simp?

 

[Marener]

No such bill will ever be sent to the White House.

So you can see the future now? There’s no basis for this claim.

 

[Rawley]

He said that Facebook decided what to take down and what not to take down.

Not the government.

LOL

"Zuckerberg says Biden administration pressured Meta to censor COVID-19 content"

You funny. Actual attempts at censorship by your team- hunky dory. Trump makes an off hand suggestion - you lose your shit. LOL

 

[Marener]

Under pressure. And acquiescing to it warranted an apology.

How difficult is it for you to follow along, simp?

Pressure but not force. Facebook decided what to take down. You said that was bullshit but the facts prove otherwise.

 

[BackAgain]

Nope. Nothing in Dobbs says that the federal government can’t enact an abortion ban. All Dobbs said that there is no right to have an abortion and it can be regulated. By state government. By federal government. It doesn’t matter.

That’s not what Dobbs said.

Returning the matter to the States acknowledged that it was not a federal matter. So any law to cover all abortions in the nation would deny the States their lawful right to address the issue themselves.

I’m sorry you are unable to follow along or be honest.

 

[Rawley]

So you can see the future now? There’s no basis for this claim.

LOL "no basis" So why hasn't your cult codified Roe v. Wade?

 

[Arlette]

Trumpy: "Now she wants to do transgender operations on illegals that are in prison"

What's a moderator supposed to do with something like that?

 

[Godboy]

Liberal hacks shouldn't be moderators. These two are two of the biggest hacks out there.

ABC should be banned for life by the RNC. They cheated and instead of holding an actual debate, they were interfering with the election. It was a total scam and there needs to be repurcussions for this blatant election interference.

 

[Marener]

Nope

Nope

Nope

Bravo.

 

[Rawley]

Bravo.

With the partisan lies you spew, it's shooting fish in a barrel

 

[Marener]

That’s not what Dobbs said.

Returning the matter to the States acknowledged that it was not a federal matter. So any law to cover all abortions in the nation would deny the States their lawful right to address the issue themselves.

I’m sorry you are unable to follow along or be honest.

This isn’t a quote from Dobbs, it’s just a claim you made.

Dobbs said that the constitution doesn’t prevent the government from regulating or banning abortion. It doesn’t say anything about the constitution preventing the federal government from doing so.

 

[Marener]

With the partisan lies you spew, it's shooting fish in a barrel

Nope.

 

[playtime]

dear OP,

fact checking is not being biased.

sincerely, playtime.


ps

 

[BackAgain]

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Dobbs.

“ … supporters of Roe and Casey must show that this Court has the authority to weigh those arguments and decide how abortion may be regulated in the States. They have failed to make that showing, and we thus return the power to weigh those arguments to the people and their elected representatives.”

Id.
“… the States may regulate abortion for legitimate reasons, and when such regulations are challenged under the Constitution, courts cannot “substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies.” Ferguson, 372 U. S., at 729–730; see also Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 484–486 (1970); United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144, 152 (1938).”
Id.
“We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives.”

Id. [emphasis added]

As I said, the Dobbs decision clearly left this matter to the respective States.

It is not a federal matter

 

[BackAgain]

So you can see the future now? There’s no basis for this claim.

I can see things much more clearly than you. That’s clear.

 

[Marener]

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Dobbs.

“ … supporters of Roe and Casey must show that this Court has the authority to weigh those arguments and decide how abortion may be regulated in the States. They have failed to make that showing, and we thus return the power to weigh those arguments to the people and their elected representatives.”

Id.
“… the States may regulate abortion for legitimate reasons, and when such regulations are challenged under the Constitution, courts cannot “substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies.” Ferguson, 372 U. S., at 729–730; see also Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 484–486 (1970); United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144, 152 (1938).”
Id.
“We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives.”

Id. [emphasis added]

As I said, the Dobbs decision clearly left this matter to the respective States.

It is not a federal matter

The bill in question was a state bill. It does not say it can’t be a federal matter. A federal bill just has to have a rational basis. The constitution will not stop it.

 

[BackAgain]

Pressure but not force. Facebook decided what to take down. You said that was bullshit but the facts prove otherwise.

Being pressured means it wasn’t their decision.

You’re proved wrong yet again, ya quibbling little mutt.