ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

Christie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:
Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.
The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.
“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.
That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives.
...
Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.
When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.
But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.
The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her
...
But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.
t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.

That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.
The OP is fake news.
The source (Redstate) is clearly biased.
Christie got on the news and spouted lies and canned talking points propaganda.
That's all.
The American people DID pay attention to the hearings.
And Trump's popularity plummetted.
Christie is a greasy, irrelevant liar.
 
The OP is fake news.
The source (Redstate) is clearly biased.
Christie got on the news and spouted lies and canned talking points propaganda.
That's all.
The American people DID pay attention to the hearings.
And Trump's popularity plummetted.
Christie is a greasy, irrelevant liar.
Why are you still talking about trump if that were true?
 
The OP is fake news.
The source (Redstate) is clearly biased.
Christie got on the news and spouted lies and canned talking points propaganda.
That's all.
The American people DID pay attention to the hearings.
And Trump's popularity plummetted.
Christie is a greasy, irrelevant liar.
This ^^^ is what the left has been reduced to.

Sad.
 
If you bothered to open the links and glance over them, you'd see they were written during the best economic times of our life. They were pre-covid when our market was stable, gasoline and fuel prices were reasonable, inflation at a normal rate, actions being taken to slow down border crossings, jobs were plentiful, we were never doing better and our people happier.

It only goes to prove how the MSM is not an information industry, but part of the Democrat party. Social media (now outside of Twitter) is part of the Democrat party, entertainment is part of the Democrat party, and sadly, sports are a part of the Democrat party.
Big deal. Economic predictions called for that kind of economy, no matter who won that election. It would have been the same or better with anybody as president.
 
The OP is fake news.
The source (Redstate) is clearly biased.
Christie got on the news and spouted lies and canned talking points propaganda.
That's all.
The American people DID pay attention to the hearings.
And Trump's popularity plummetted.
Christie is a greasy, irrelevant liar.
In spite of Fluffers jamming their fingers in their eyes insisting they can't see it.
 
Big deal. Economic predictions called for that kind of economy, no matter who won that election. It would have been the same or better with anybody as president.

Of course it would have, I forgot leftists have crystal balls. Just like our country would still be in ruins even if Biden wasn't President, huh? I just love all these coincidences you on the left have.
 
If you bothered to open the links and glance over them, you'd see they were written during the best economic times of our life. They were pre-covid when our market was stable, gasoline and fuel prices were reasonable, inflation at a normal rate, actions being taken to slow down border crossings, jobs were plentiful, we were never doing better and our people happier.

It only goes to prove how the MSM is not an information industry, but part of the Democrat party. Social media (now outside of Twitter) is part of the Democrat party, entertainment is part of the Democrat party, and sadly, sports are a part of the Democrat party.
Ray,

The idea that the pre-covid economy was a consequence of Grifty policies is the stuff of myth.

Grifty overspent and underperformed...
 
Ray,

The idea that the pre-covid economy was a consequence of Grifty policies is the stuff of myth.

Grifty overspent and underperformed...

He was the best President we had since Reagan. Yes it was his policies like removing job killing regulations, and creating the new policy for every business regulation made, two had to be removed in it's place. Policies like lowering taxes to keep jobs here was also a big help. Pre-covid we had a million more jobs than Americans that could work them.

But this is less a policy discussion than it is the fact the MSM is part of the Democrat party and it doesn't matter how well a Republican Congress or President does. They will continue to bash them. Just like it doesn't matter how disasterous a Democrat President or Congress is. They will always write how great they are.
 
He was the best President we had since Reagan. Yes it was his policies like removing job killing regulations, and creating the new policy for every business regulation made, two had to be removed in it's place. Policies like lowering taxes to keep jobs here was also a big help. Pre-covid we had a million more jobs than Americans that could work them.

But this is less a policy discussion than it is the fact the MSM is part of the Democrat party and it doesn't matter how well a Republican Congress or President does. They will continue to bash them. Just like it doesn't matter how disasterous a Democrat President or Congress is. They will always write how great they are.
So how did monthly job numbers under Grifty compare to Obama?
 

Forum List

Back
Top