Abortion is major in this election.

You don’t remember the insurrection that followed the completely honest presidential election in the year that Derek Chauvin was rightfully convicted of first degree murder of a sainted, totally honest black victim which encouraged multiple peaceful protests nationwide as a naturally occurring virus spread worldwide and spawned a vaccine that saved everyone except for those fascists who refuse to get one?
You don’t remember that? It was in all the Pravda news.
 
Abortion is decided at the State level by the voters. Trump has made it quite clear that he doesn't want a Federal abortion ban.
Sometimes he says that .sometimes he says other shit.

Bottom line?

He’d sign whatever the hardline republicans put on his desk and THEY want to ban abortion totally
 
Sometimes he says that .sometimes he says other shit.

Bottom line?

He’d sign whatever the hardline republicans put on his desk and THEY want to ban abortion totally
Trump has been very consistent with his message on abortion. It's up to the States. He's said REPEATEDLY that he does not want a Federal ban on abortions!
 
You don’t remember the insurrection that followed the completely honest presidential election in the year that Derek Chauvin was rightfully convicted of first degree murder of a sainted, totally honest black victim which encouraged multiple peaceful protests nationwide as a naturally occurring virus spread worldwide and spawned a vaccine that saved everyone except for those fascists who refuse to get one?
You don’t remember that? It was in all the Pravda news.
I have a vague recollection of the mostly peaceful arsons.
 
Until a federal law is passed, this is up to the states.

And the states where abortion is on the ballot will be going blue, even in the heavy GOP states.

Most women almost 75% are for regulated abortion.


Exactly what would be the constitutional basis for such a law. SCOTUS will not uphold a law with no constitutional authority to pass it. From the Dobbs decision page 85:

As we have explained, procuring an abortion is not a fundamental constitutional right because such a right has no basis in the Constitution’s text or in our Nation’s history. See supra, at 8–39.
<<<snip>>>
A law regulating abortion, like other health and welfare laws, is entitled to a “strong presumption of validity.” Heller v. Doe, 509 U. S. 312, 319 (1993). It must be sustained if there is a rational basis on which the legislature could have thought that it would serve legitimate state interests.

.
 
Yes, you should be involved. You should make your position known.

For me and my people, the woman is in charge.

Read up on Project 2025. It is not the citizen's friend.

View attachment 1021299 Get out and vote.
No, it's not. Most women wouldn't dream of killing their offspring.

And who is the leftwing illiterate who did the poster? "Project 2025 in affect". ROFL.
 
Exactly what would be the constitutional basis for such a law. SCOTUS will not uphold a law with no constitutional authority to pass it. From the Dobbs decision page 85:

As we have explained, procuring an abortion is not a fundamental constitutional right because such a right has no basis in the Constitution’s text or in our Nation’s history. See supra, at 8–39.
<<<snip>>>
A law regulating abortion, like other health and welfare laws, is entitled to a “strong presumption of validity.” Heller v. Doe, 509 U. S. 312, 319 (1993). It must be sustained if there is a rational basis on which the legislature could have thought that it would serve legitimate state interests.

.
All the more reason to NOT vote for Republicans

From dog catcher to the White House
 
Your article says Trump has been 'unclear' on his position on abortion ban. Then it says Trump would consider a 15 week abortion ban?????? I mean, WTF? Can you not comprehend? Nowhere does he promote a nationwide ban on abortions like your lying ass is trying to portray. From your link:

"Trump's video also contained multiple lies, including mischaracterizations of legal scholars' views on Roe v. Wade, as well as mischaracterizations of Democratic stances on abortion."

Of course the article never tells us even one of these 'mischaracterizations.'

The article also tries to conflate Trump's position with "Students for Life of Action" because the group president said Trump is an opponent of abortion rights. What they did there is grab a statement made by somebody else and pretend Trump agrees with it.

That article is so full of shit it literally drips sewage and, of course, you drink that swill like mother's milk.
 
Your article says Trump has been 'unclear' on his position on abortion ban. Then it says Trump would consider a 15 week abortion ban?????? I mean, WTF? Can you not comprehend? Nowhere does he promote a nationwide ban on abortions like your lying ass is trying to portray. From your link:

"Trump's video also contained multiple lies, including mischaracterizations of legal scholars' views on Roe v. Wade, as well as mischaracterizations of Democratic stances on abortion."

Of course the article never tells us even one of these 'mischaracterizations.'

The article also tries to conflate Trump's position with "Students for Life of Action" because the group president said Trump is an opponent of abortion rights. What they did there is grab a statement made by somebody else and pretend Trump agrees with it.

That article is so full of shit it literally drips sewage and, of course, you drink that swill like mother's milk.
As I said. He’s all over the place. As always

Bottom line he’ll sign whatever they put on his desk.

And let’s not forget he BUILT the Court that killed Roe and passed Dobbs
 
As I said. He’s all over the place. As always

Bottom line he’ll sign whatever they put on his desk.

And let’s not forget he BUILT the Court that killed Roe and passed Dobbs
No, the article and you are 'all over the place' with your vapid statements and lies about Trump.

Trump is not like Biden who will sign any bill on his desk.

Trump didn't build the court. If he did, he would not allow Kentji Jackson (who couldn't say what a woman was) to be a jurist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top