jotathought
Diamond Member
His boss disagrees with you.Well, for one, he didn’t quit the reserves because he was going to a combat zone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His boss disagrees with you.Well, for one, he didn’t quit the reserves because he was going to a combat zone.
& now for the truth...
Fact-checking attacks on Walz’s military record by Vance and other Republicans
Politics Aug 11, 2024 5:32 PM EDT
Walz retired from the Minnesota National Guard in May 2005. He had submitted retirement paperwork five to seven months beforehand, Fox News reported, citing the Minnesota National Guard.
In March 2005, Walz’s battalion had been notified about a possible deployment to Iraq within two years, Walz’s congressional campaign said in a news release that month, citing the National Guard Public Affairs Office. The Minnesota National Guard said the battalion then received an official order about mobilizing for deployment to Iraq in July 2005, after Walz retired.
Vance’s statement misleads by distorting the timeline. Walz had not been “asked by his country to go to Iraq,” as Vance said. He had been given a two-year window for a potential, not definite, deployment. And the official deployment notice came after Walz’s retirement.
Walz has said since before his Army retirement that he left to run for Congress. He filed his candidacy paperwork in February 2005, before the March 2005 notification about the potential deployment.
Fact-checking attacks on Walz's military record by Vance and other Republicans
damn those pesky facts.
So prove otherwise.PBS fact checking? Lol
Walz retired from the Minnesota National Guard in May 2005. He had submitted retirement paperwork five to seven months beforehand, Fox News reported, citing the Minnesota National Guard.
In March 2005, Walz’s battalion had been notified about a possible deployment to Iraq within two years, Walz’s congressional campaign said in a news release that month, citing the National Guard Public Affairs Office. The Minnesota National Guard said the battalion then received an official order about mobilizing for deployment to Iraq in July 2005, after Walz retired.
Vance’s statement misleads by distorting the timeline. Walz had not been “asked by his country to go to Iraq,” as Vance said. He had been given a two-year window for a potential, not definite, deployment. And the official deployment notice came after Walz’s retirement.
Walz has said since before his Army retirement that he left to run for Congress. He filed his candidacy paperwork in February 2005, before the March 2005 notification about the potential deployment.
Command Seargent Major Doug Julin, who was the now-Minnesota governor's direct report, went through the timeline with Laura Coates. Not only did Walz know about the deployment, but he had committed to go. It was only after he went around Julin that he was able to secure his retirement, leaving his unit hamstrung just months before they shipped out.That would be fake news.
Which "accusations" have been wrong?
No, Command Seargent Major Doug Julin is calling Walz a liarSo prove otherwise.
Damn it upsets you so much when your narrative is blown up with FACTS.
Are you calling these dates quoted below.........are you calling them LIES?
Command Seargent Major Doug Julin, who was the now-Minnesota governor's direct report, went through the timeline with Laura Coates. Not only did Walz know about the deployment, but he had committed to go. It was only after he went around Julin that he was able to secure his retirement, leaving his unit hamstrung just months before they shipped out.
were you in viet nam mac?You gave me a thumbs down and thats ok
But Walz own fellow soldiers accuse him of bailing out instead of fulfilling his NG obligations
Facts are not their friends....neither is anyone else for that matter.So prove otherwise.
Damn it upsets you so much when your narrative is blown up with FACTS.
Are you calling these dates quoted below.........are you calling them LIES?
PBS fact checking? Lol
"trump has created an environment in which skepticism is warranted." michael steele , fmr rnc chmnFacts are not their friends....neither is anyone else for that matter.
All of the crazy attacks on Walz are just so silly. And, ya know, if any of them did have a nugget of truth to them, perhaps they would get some legs to them but these guys have cried wolf so often.... Remember 6 weeks ago--biden was on cocaine? Everyone of these scumbags who are saying this nonsense about Walz was repeating that crap. Before that it was Obama not being born in the US...It goes back decades. All to prop up their orange blob--a 34X convicted felon.
That is today’s GOP.
You gave me a thumbs down and thats ok
But Walz own fellow soldiers accuse him of bailing out instead of fulfilling his NG obligations
No, Command Seargent Major Doug Julin is calling Walz a liar
Walz final enlistment was for 6 years and he needed permission to retire earlywere you in viet nam mac?
when a guy's time was up most of them chose to go home. there were good reasons for an extended tour, but if you didn't have one it is not cowardice or desertion to go home.
it is not the "nights watch out of westeros, where you serve until death.
"and now his watch is over." i sure went home. 2 good everything left too. like winning the lottery.
No, just a coward.Its just about the only thing the looney right hasn’t accused him of being.
You mean like Biden's been competent since 2019?True.
And the lies are getting even more ridiculous and desperate.
That's convenient, what a lucky chap& now for the truth...
Fact-checking attacks on Walz’s military record by Vance and other Republicans
Politics Aug 11, 2024 5:32 PM EDT
Walz retired from the Minnesota National Guard in May 2005. He had submitted retirement paperwork five to seven months beforehand, Fox News reported, citing the Minnesota National Guard.
In March 2005, Walz’s battalion had been notified about a possible deployment to Iraq within two years, Walz’s congressional campaign said in a news release that month, citing the National Guard Public Affairs Office. The Minnesota National Guard said the battalion then received an official order about mobilizing for deployment to Iraq in July 2005, after Walz retired.
Vance’s statement misleads by distorting the timeline. Walz had not been “asked by his country to go to Iraq,” as Vance said. He had been given a two-year window for a potential, not definite, deployment. And the official deployment notice came after Walz’s retirement.
Walz has said since before his Army retirement that he left to run for Congress. He filed his candidacy paperwork in February 2005, before the March 2005 notification about the potential deployment.
Fact-checking attacks on Walz's military record by Vance and other Republicans
damn those pesky facts.
No need for that, they're bad enough as it is.Bullshit. Total lie from top to bottom.
There are no limits to the depths you will think to, in order to slander a member of the Democratic Party.
You forgot one.Its just about the only thing the looney right hasn’t accused him of being.