🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Action, Reaction, Result

MJB12741

Gold Member
Feb 19, 2012
13,886
3,009
280
Palestinians fire rocket missiles to kill Israeli's. Israel retaliates. And then Palestinians & their supporters cry over how many more dead Palestinians there are then Israelis. It's called Palestinian Mentality.
 
Palestinians fire rocket missiles to kill Israeli's. Israel retaliates. And then Palestinians & their supporters cry over how many more dead Palestinians there are then Israelis. It's called Palestinian Mentality.
To be accurate, it's called Palestinian Mentality PSYCHOSIS.
 
Palestinians fire rocket missiles to kill Israeli's. Israel retaliates. And then Palestinians & their supporters cry over how many more dead Palestinians there are then Israelis. It's called Palestinian Mentality.

And the world buys it. So why won't they play this game in every chance they get? They see it works…
The sad thing, Lipush, is that the world seems to lap up so much nonsense when it comes to the Muslims and conveniently overlooks what is happening to others.

Are Muslim Lives Worth More Than Hindu or Christian Lives? | FrontPage Magazine
 
No they weren't. They killed one militant who was just digging a tunnel connected to Deir al Balah, they then launched another airstrike at militants elsewhere. It wasn't pre emptive action. And that was what tipped of the whole 2009 offensive.

You only look at things from one point of view.

It was a raid into their territory.
 
Actually correction. Israel raided Gaza territory with their excuse that they want to destroy a tunnel, of course, with the IDF's history of lying. No one believes that. Then they clashed with Hamas fighters defending their borders.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/world/middleeast/05mideast.html?_r=0


An Israeli security force had entered Gaza to destroy a tunnel and fought with Hamas gunmen, killing one and wounding at least three, according to Palestinian hospital officials.
 
Tunnels were the only way at the time to smuggle in meccasary needs for the people in Gaza as a result of the siege. It's only Israeli apologetics who deny it. Israel does admit it broke the ceasefire.

Delusions of victory in Gaza - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

Six months ago Israel asked and received a cease-fire from Hamas. It unilaterally violated it when it blew up a tunnel, while still asking Egypt to get the Islamic group to hold its fire. Are conditions enabling the return of a ceasefire no longer available? Hamas has clear conditions for its extension: The opening of the border crossings for goods and cessation of IDF attacks in Gaza, as outlined in the original agreement. Later, Hamas wants the cease-fire to be extended to the West Bank. Israel, for its part, is justifiably demanding a real calm in Gaza; that no Qassam or mortar shell be fired by either Hamas, Islamic Jihad or any other group.
 
Your own link works well in Israel's support. May I post it again after it dies out?

Gaza truce broken as Israeli raid kills six Hamas gunmen | World news | guardian.co.uk
__________________




Tunnels were the only way at the time to smuggle in meccasary needs for the people in Gaza as a result of the siege. It's only Israeli apologetics who deny it. Israel does admit it broke the ceasefire.

Delusions of victory in Gaza - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

Six months ago Israel asked and received a cease-fire from Hamas. It unilaterally violated it when it blew up a tunnel, while still asking Egypt to get the Islamic group to hold its fire. Are conditions enabling the return of a ceasefire no longer available? Hamas has clear conditions for its extension: The opening of the border crossings for goods and cessation of IDF attacks in Gaza, as outlined in the original agreement. Later, Hamas wants the cease-fire to be extended to the West Bank. Israel, for its part, is justifiably demanding a real calm in Gaza; that no Qassam or mortar shell be fired by either Hamas, Islamic Jihad or any other group.
 
Your own link works well in Israel's support. May I post it again after it dies out?

Gaza truce broken as Israeli raid kills six Hamas gunmen | World news | guardian.co.uk
__________________




Tunnels were the only way at the time to smuggle in meccasary needs for the people in Gaza as a result of the siege. It's only Israeli apologetics who deny it. Israel does admit it broke the ceasefire.

Delusions of victory in Gaza - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

Six months ago Israel asked and received a cease-fire from Hamas. It unilaterally violated it when it blew up a tunnel, while still asking Egypt to get the Islamic group to hold its fire. Are conditions enabling the return of a ceasefire no longer available? Hamas has clear conditions for its extension: The opening of the border crossings for goods and cessation of IDF attacks in Gaza, as outlined in the original agreement. Later, Hamas wants the cease-fire to be extended to the West Bank. Israel, for its part, is justifiably demanding a real calm in Gaza; that no Qassam or mortar shell be fired by either Hamas, Islamic Jihad or any other group.
They don't even read half the shit they post. LOL
 
Honestly, I laughed at the link BIK posted. Sure wish I had posted it. The nerve of Israel breaking a truce in Gaza with Hamas Gunmen.



Your own link works well in Israel's support. May I post it again after it dies out?

Gaza truce broken as Israeli raid kills six Hamas gunmen | World news | guardian.co.uk
__________________




Tunnels were the only way at the time to smuggle in meccasary needs for the people in Gaza as a result of the siege. It's only Israeli apologetics who deny it. Israel does admit it broke the ceasefire.

Delusions of victory in Gaza - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

Six months ago Israel asked and received a cease-fire from Hamas. It unilaterally violated it when it blew up a tunnel, while still asking Egypt to get the Islamic group to hold its fire. Are conditions enabling the return of a ceasefire no longer available? Hamas has clear conditions for its extension: The opening of the border crossings for goods and cessation of IDF attacks in Gaza, as outlined in the original agreement. Later, Hamas wants the cease-fire to be extended to the West Bank. Israel, for its part, is justifiably demanding a real calm in Gaza; that no Qassam or mortar shell be fired by either Hamas, Islamic Jihad or any other group.
They don't even read half the shit they post. LOL
 
Awww, what did you think they were holding?....:cuckoo::cuckoo::lol:

They're military members, just because they're militants doesn't justify a unprovoked attack.

That's like saying its ok that Israeli troops were killed unprovoked because they're israeli troops

:cuckoo:
 
The Palestinians have the desire to kill all the Israeli's but don't have the capability.

Israel has the capability to kill all the Palestinians but don't have the desire.

The only solution for peace I can see is for Israel to end the occupation by finding some incentive to offer the Arab countries to grant their Palestinians a right of return back to their indigenous homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!
 
HUH??? What exactly did I say here that you believe is 'bull."

The Palestinians have the desire to kill all the Israeli's but don't have the capability.

Israel has the capability to kill all the Palestinians but don't have the desire.

The only solution for peace I can see is for Israel to end the occupation by finding some incentive to offer the Arab countries to grant their Palestinians a right of return back to their indigenous homelands. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!




That's bull, you're making arbitrary assertions.
 
No, no, no, it's not my job to give reasons. You made the arbitrary assertions. That's not how you debate.
 
Okay, lets debate. Do you agree the Palestinians fire rocket missiles at Israel from Gaza? And Israel retaliates? And then the Palestinians & their suppoprters like you complain about how many more Palestinians are killed than Israeli's?


No, no, no, it's not my job to give reasons. You made the arbitrary assertions. That's not how you debate.
 
You're still making arbitrary assertions. Try again. But it's as if you're also ignoring the decades of the conflict and trying to reduce to the past decade.
 

Forum List

Back
Top