Adam Schiff Says He's Got Evidence ... Again...

an insult is an opionion, but bernstein & woodward arent giving an opionion or insults, they are giving facts backed up by evidence.
prove it.

then prove it's illegal.

The right to take down a corrupt government is in our constitution.
 
prove it.

then prove it's illegal.

The right to take down a corrupt government is in our constitution.
Them 2 crafty lazy journalist used " Deep Throat " for
much of their content.How cushy cutsey.
It was fitting that Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford
were cast.Two near perfect cast infernally Liberal actors.
 
Bwuhahahaha

Yeah, just like during Pelosi's 1st Impeachment, when he perjury himself claiming he had a 'whistleblower'

Yeah just like during Pelosi's 1st Impeachment, when he was caught illegally manufacturing fake evidence against a President of the United States.

Adam Schiff should be in prison right now...except laws don't apply to Democrats.

Based on his past crimes, nothing Schiff says or presents should be taken seriously...

...and he only has himself to blame.


Schiff missed his calling. He could make more money filling hot air balloons.
 
Conspiracy to overturn an election? Like asking the Georgia Secretary of State to "FIND" 11,780 ballots for Trump.

Misleading statement he was asking to find a way to change the existing 11,780 votes he claims were already illegal votes for Biden back to Trump votes.

Leftists lies a lot about what Trump actually said about it which are all public record by the way.
 
they have to lie to get a message out.
I guess it's either LIE or crap the pants.
Dint Old Joe like crap his pants when visiting the
Pope in Rome { Vatican city }. Probably due to some
vacationing Devil not wearing Prada and looking for available
Catholics to corrupt on sainted ground.
 
Misleading statement he was asking to find a way to change the existing 11,780 votes he claims were already illegal votes for Biden back to Trump votes.

Leftists lies a lot about what Trump actually said about it which are all public record by the way.

Did you fail math?
Biden was ahead of Trump by 11,779 votes


Popular vote
Biden 2,473,633
Trump 2,461,854

Trump was asking the secretary of state to "FIND" 11,780 votes for Trump out of thin air.

If it was a matter of switching Biden votes to Trump, it would have only taken 5,890 votes (half as many)
 
Then why is the grand jury going forward?

June 2, 2022 2:25 PM

The top Georgia election official who refused to "find" votes for former President Donald Trump testified Thursday about the infamous call and other attempts to overturn the state's 2020 election results.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is one of the first subpoenaed witnesses to testify in front of a special grand jury impaneled in Fulton County as part of a wide-ranging investigation into efforts by Trump and others to subvert Georgia's election process and undo President Joe Biden's narrow victory.

Raffensperger's testimony lasted for four hours and his wife, Tricia, spoke for about 10 minutes, according to someone briefed on the matter but not authorized to speak on his behalf.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is seeking information from a number of witnesses that will guide her decision to potentially bring charges against Trump or others in his orbit for meddling with Georgia's election.

The 23-person special grand jury, selected last month, is also asking for any notes surrounding the Trump call, information about Georgia's thrice-counted presidential results and other election-related documents.
I dont see a transcript of the call in your link postman
 
^^^^^^^Useful idiot: Exhibit A^^^^^

The people on your side don't even know the difference between secretary of state and lead election investigator.
The difference between a 6 minute conversation, and an hour long conversation.

Tell us about useful idiots that failed reading and 'rithmatic.
 
Idiot. That's NOT the story about the phone call to the Secretary of State.

Your citation:
On Jan. 9, The Post reported that then-President Donald Trump, in a call with Georgia’s lead elections investigator, Frances Watson, had instructed her to “find the fraud.” He mentioned that she could become a “national hero,” reported the newspaper.

In both cases, the quotes were wrong, as The Post has acknowledged in a correction to the story. “Trump did not tell the investigator to ‘find the fraud’ or say she would be ‘a national hero’ if she did so. Instead, Trump urged the investigator to scrutinize ballots in Fulton County, Ga., asserting she would find ‘dishonesty’ there. He also told her that she had ‘the most important job in the country right now,’” reads the correction, in part.



As I said they got the quotes to the Secretary of State correct.
Link?
 
The people on your side don't even know the difference between secretary of state and lead election investigator.
The difference between a 6 minute conversation, and an hour long conversation.

Tell us about useful idiots that failed reading and 'rithmatic.
where’s the transcript?
 
The people on your side don't even know the difference between secretary of state and lead election investigator.
The difference between a 6 minute conversation, and an hour long conversation.

Tell us about useful idiots that failed reading and 'rithmatic.
I have said nothing about either of those folks, so why are you quoting me, Dipsqueeze?
 
bernstein & woodward wrote,
"Donald Trump not only sought to destroy the electoral system through false claims of voter fraud and unprecedented public intimidation of state election officials, but he also then attempted to prevent the peaceful transfer of power to his duly elected successor, for the first time in American history,"

if youre too lazy to read, i cant help you.
Who gives a shit WTF two leftist hacks think?
 
then why did the Post retract their story?
This is getting long in the tooth.
They retracted the story on the lead election investigators 6 minute phone call.
The story on the hour long secretary of states phone call was 100% accurate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top