- Mar 11, 2015
- 83,613
- 50,504
No that's not enough because Jim Crow created economic hardships lasting to this moment that have not been fixed..I think just killing off Jim Crow would be enough ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No that's not enough because Jim Crow created economic hardships lasting to this moment that have not been fixed..I think just killing off Jim Crow would be enough ...
I think that we all can cherrypick bible verses. Deuteronomy chapter 15 verse 1 talks about freeing and paying slaves after they served 7 years. Blacks were slaves for 246 years without pay. So biblically we are owed 32 payments. God has punished generations after the original sin was committed. Ask Noah." Figuratively Reparations Have Already Been Received "
* Easy Key All Eighteen Twenty *
Argue with this well understood and ethically maintained tenet .We will get reparations. They will be paid for American government human rights violations against blacks from either 1776 until the date the decision is made, 1865 until the the decision is made, from 1927 until the decision is made, or 1934 until the decision is made. The issue goes way past the days of slavery. That's why you racists don't want to talk about what whites did after slavery.
[20] The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.Bible, King James Version
quod.lib.umich.edu
* Individualism Equality Rule Set *
Those individuals being compelled to forfeit self ownership or self determination are entitled to self defense against such illegitimate aggression .
Each receives resources for providence in their lives and only the villainy of a covetous fool expects illegitimate aggression against self ownership or self determination of other individuals based upon an over aggrandized arrogance of self entitlement because their own inception resources were not equal with those of some other jones .
There will be no subtraction for that. Families of white Union soldiers and descendants of white confederate soldiers who did not fight in the war to save the union, got reparations. Thar war did not create generational poverty for whites. Whites did not fight to free slaves as you will shortly be shown. Furthermore if whites had died fighting slavery, you do not get reparations for fighting a war caused by YOUR human rights violations. Every way it is looked at, you racist have no case for objections. The only reason you get to argue your idiocy is white privilege.We can start with a base of $12 trillion.
From that we subtract all the Federal, state and local welfare given to the Negroes over the years.
Then we can subtract the inefficiency to the economy caused by Affrimative Action and EEO programs.
Then we can subtract the cost of the failure of education on the economy caused by having integrated schools.
Then we subtract the cost of keeping criminal Negroes locked up for criminal behavior.
Then we subtract the cost of Negro crime.
Then we subtract the cost of all their looting and rioting and destruction over the decades.
If the Moon Bats really believe that the Civil War was fought to free the slaves then we need to subtract the cost of the war.
They will owe us money when we get done with the real economic balance.
Don't forget to subtract the losses to the families who lost loved ones in the Civil War. That alone caused many families to be tossed into poverty for generations.
No that's not enough because Jim Crow created economic hardships lasting to this moment that have not been fixed..I think just killing off Jim Crow would be enough ...
I think just killing off Jim Crow would be enough ...
While the House debated the measure over the ensuing weeks, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas had joined South Carolina in seceding from the Union. The contentious atmosphere in the House during the debate was relieved by abolitionist Republican Owen Lovejoy of Illinois, who questioned the amendment's reach: "Does that include polygamy, the other twin relic of barbarism?" Missouri Democrat John S. Phelps answered: "Does the gentleman desire to know whether he shall be prohibited from committing that crime?"[6]No amendment of this Constitution, having for its object any interference within the States with the relations between their citizens and those described in second section of the first article of the Constitution as "all other persons", shall originate with any State that does not recognize that relation within its own limits, or shall be valid without the assent of every one of the States composing the Union.[10]
Just weeks prior to the outbreak of the Civil War, Lincoln sent a letter to each state's governor transmitting the proposed amendment,[18] noting that Buchanan had approved it.[19]I understand a proposed amendment to the Constitution—which amendment, however, I have not seen—has passed Congress, to the effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to service ... holding such a provision to now be implied constitutional law, I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable.
Nope. The root cause of the problems blacks face is white racism. This has been proven.No that's not enough because Jim Crow created economic hardships lasting to this moment that have not been fixed..I think just killing off Jim Crow would be enough ...
No, the problems in the black community are your own. When some gangbanger scumbag kills an innocent you assholes refuse to talk to the police.
Your problems are YOURS.
Nope. The root cause of the problems blacks face is white racism. This has been proven.No that's not enough because Jim Crow created economic hardships lasting to this moment that have not been fixed..I think just killing off Jim Crow would be enough ...
No, the problems in the black community are your own. When some gangbanger scumbag kills an innocent you assholes refuse to talk to the police.
Your problems are YOURS.
“One of the conclusions of the Kerner Report was that white racism was at work, was the cause of the upsets and the uprisings that we had. In fact, the report stated that white society created it, perpetuates it, and sustains it.”
First , the torah does not apply outside of israel , just as the qurayn does not apply outside of hejaz .I think that we all can cherrypick bible verses. Deuteronomy chapter 15 verse 1 talks about freeing and paying slaves after they served 7 years. Blacks were slaves for 246 years without pay. So biblically we are owed 32 payments. God has punished generations after the original sin was committed. Ask Noah. The use of biblical passages to excuse human rights violations is unethical.
The last paragraph defines non violence principles and places you in the category of promoting illegitimate aggression against individualism and against individuals which have nothing to do with your need for someone else to BLaMe .Your last paragraph is a bunch of white racist horse manure. You don't get to deny people equal access to resources for 200 years then talk stupid.
In 1951 a black man named Harvey Clark and his family tried to move into the Cicero neighborhood of Chicago. A white mob vandalized his home and burned his furniture in the front yard. Aside from trying to force Clark out of his own home, the police did nothing. In first six months of 1955 there were 213 acts of violence against blacks by whites is Philadelphia. These were acts of terror committed to intimidate blacks so they would not move into white communities. In 1964 when blacks again tried renting an apartment in Cicero, their apartment was again vandalized. After the apartment was vandalized, police entered the apartment, took out the furniture and told the renters they had been evicted. At the same time in Detroit, there were over 200 acts of violence against blacks by whites to terrorize black families so they would not move to the suburbs. In Los Angeles during World War II, a entire black family was murdered when their home was bombed. For the first 5 years after WW2 in Chicago alone, there were 317 acts of terror by whites against blacks who tried living in or near majority white neighborhoods. From 1950-1965 there were over 100 bombings of black owned residences in Los Angeles. In 1987, another black family tried moving into Cicero. Whites responded with gunfire and firebombs.
This kind of terrorism has gone long ignored in understanding the brutality and long-lasting effects of such acts upon blacks in America. For decades prosperous blacks were terrorized while black communities were destroyed by mobs of angry whites who felt they were losing out because blacks had acquired the same things whites had. Ignored was the fact that blacks worked hard to get what they had, but that did not matter because blacks were to always be lesser than whites and the caste was to be created and maintained by any means necessary.
Blacks peacefully moved north to compete for same opportunities white immigrants had and this is just a small bit of what happened. White immigrants are the ones who committed the violence against blacks. White immigrants destroyed thriving black communities. The same white immigrants whose descendants will tell you today how they are not responsible because their ancestors did not own slaves.
“Again and again, African-American individuals and families have worked hard to produce wealth, but American finance, whether in the antebellum period or today, has snatched black wealth through bonds backed by asset securitization.”
Edward E. Baptist and Louis Hyman, American Finance Grew on the Back of Slaves
The root cause of the problems blacks face is white racism.
Why didn't they immigrate to Africa if they were so oppressed by White people?
No they stayed here and signed up for welfare, committed crimes, got drunk on Colt Malt Liquor, abandoned their families and then, especially in Chicago, started killing one another.
In 1951 a black man named Harvey Clark and his family tried to move into the Cicero neighborhood of Chicago. A white mob vandalized his home and burned his furniture in the front yard. Aside from trying to force Clark out of his own home, the police did nothing. In first six months of 1955 there were 213 acts of violence against blacks by whites is Philadelphia. These were acts of terror committed to intimidate blacks so they would not move into white communities. In 1964 when blacks again tried renting an apartment in Cicero, their apartment was again vandalized. After the apartment was vandalized, police entered the apartment, took out the furniture and told the renters they had been evicted. At the same time in Detroit, there were over 200 acts of violence against blacks by whites to terrorize black families so they would not move to the suburbs. In Los Angeles during World War II, a entire black family was murdered when their home was bombed. For the first 5 years after WW2 in Chicago alone, there were 317 acts of terror by whites against blacks who tried living in or near majority white neighborhoods. From 1950-1965 there were over 100 bombings of black owned residences in Los Angeles. In 1987, another black family tried moving into Cicero. Whites responded with gunfire and firebombs.
This kind of terrorism has gone long ignored in understanding the brutality and long-lasting effects of such acts upon blacks in America. For decades prosperous blacks were terrorized while black communities were destroyed by mobs of angry whites who felt they were losing out because blacks had acquired the same things whites had. Ignored was the fact that blacks worked hard to get what they had, but that did not matter because blacks were to always be lesser than whites and the caste was to be created and maintained by any means necessary.
Blacks peacefully moved north to compete for same opportunities white immigrants had and this is just a small bit of what happened. White immigrants are the ones who committed the violence against blacks. White immigrants destroyed thriving black communities. The same white immigrants whose descendants will tell you today how they are not responsible because their ancestors did not own slaves.
“Again and again, African-American individuals and families have worked hard to produce wealth, but American finance, whether in the antebellum period or today, has snatched black wealth through bonds backed by asset securitization.”
Edward E. Baptist and Louis Hyman, American Finance Grew on the Back of Slaves
The root cause of the problems blacks face is white racism.
Why didn't they immigrate to Africa if they were so oppressed by White people?
No they stayed here and signed up for welfare, committed crimes, got drunk on Colt Malt Liquor, abandoned their families and then, especially in Chicago, started killing one another.
These are other conclusions of the kerner report -- http://www.eisenhowerfoundation.org/docs/kerner.pdf .Nope. The root cause of the problems blacks face is white racism. This has been proven.
“One of the conclusions of the Kerner Report was that white racism was at work, was the cause of the upsets and the uprisings that we had. In fact, the report stated that white society created it, perpetuates it, and sustains it.”
That statement makes it appear that the south fought the war to ensure a union where slavery would be legal in all states , which would be to reject us tenth amendment that would be absurd .The civil war was not fought by the Union to end slavery. If the Union would have had it their way, slavery would have been a constitutional right that each state had the option of pursuing. If anybody white died for slavery it was southern whites dying for the right to continue owning slaves.
My perspective is one rejecting that an individual is capable of surrendering self ownership ( free roam , free association , progeny ) to satisfy a debt of self ownership ( private property , willful intents - contracts ) , whereby even voluntary enslavement is rejected as invalid in individualism .No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.
This is the Corwin Amendment to the US Constitution. Had it been ratified, slavery would have remained a constitutionally protected right.
Thus , the south believed it was fighting to preserve a union that allowed states to determine whether slavery was allowed as an institution , whereas the north chose a position of martyrdom as an abolitionist ...."Does that include polygamy, the other twin relic of barbarism?"
No amendment of this Constitution, having for its object any interference within the States with the relations between their citizens and those described in second section of the first article of the Constitution as "all other persons", shall originate with any State that does not recognize that relation within its own limits, or shall be valid without the assent of every one of the States composing the Union.[10]
Why Lincoln Did Not Oppose the Corwin Amendment
As a member of the Whig Party, Rep. Corwin had crafted his amendment to reflect his party’s opinion that the Constitution did not grant the U.S. Congress the power to interfere with enslavement in the states where it already existed. Known at the time as the “Federal Consensus,” this opinion was shared by both radicals in favor of and abolitionists opposed to enslavement.
Like most Republicans, Abraham Lincoln (a former Whig himself) agreed that in most circumstances, the federal government lacked the power to abolish enslavement in a state. In fact, Lincoln’s 1860 Republican Party platform had endorsed this doctrine.
These losers of society already had tens of trillions in welfare and they still are at the bottom in everythingsounds very reasonable!
Duke University Economist Calls for $12 Trillion in Slavery Reparations
Economist William Darity Jr. and his wife Kirsten Mullen have co-authored a report proposing $12 trillion in slavery reparations.www.breitbart.com