Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually Raskin is simply preparing to do what SCOTUS gave Congress the power to do, bar insurrectionists from holding office.Yes, the Confiscation Act preceded the 14th amendment (it was actually a model for the Amendment if you read it). Here's your cookie
View attachment 912852
But as the Court says, Section 2383 is the Congressional legislative enforcement mechanism. No further COngressional action is required as a result of yesterday's decision. It's already on the books.
As you know, asshole Raskin is simply trying to gin up more anger from your cult already pissed off at the 9-0 decision.
Again, you guys are pissed because Raskin is proposing legislation consistent with constitutional principles.They don’t dangle out clues like you feel they may have done for you
Raskins said USSC was not clear and punted with that 9-0 rulingYes, the Confiscation Act preceded the 14th amendment (it was actually a model for the Amendment if you read it). Here's your cookie
View attachment 912852
But as the Court says, Section 2383 is the Congressional legislative enforcement mechanism. No further COngressional action is required as a result of yesterday's decision. It's already on the books.
As you know, asshole Raskin is simply trying to gin up more anger from your cult already pissed off at the 9-0 decision.
He's right. The left it up Raskin and Congress.Raskins said USSC was not clear and punted with that 9-0 ruling
I would say his reaction is denying the reality of how it was ruled. He’s on to yet another Got TrumpAgain, you guys are pissed because Raskin is proposing legislation consistent with constitutional principles.
He was described as “Putin-esque”
I would say his reaction is denying the reality of how it was ruled. He’s on to yet another Got Trump
Unanimous verdicts are always vague and barely a win in lib loon landHe's right. The left it up Raskin and Congress.
Did he say vague or did he say SCOTUS wasn't clear on whether Trump was or wasn't an insurrectionist and instead left the decision completely up to Congress? You sure you understand the ruling Short Bus? Cause it seems like you doesn't.Unanimous verdicts are always vague and barely a win in lib loon land
Yes, your pretentious condescension is noted. A really bad habit of yours. Makes you look small and insecure in your argument.I’ve been correcting you a lot today.
Raskin can obviously write whatever he thinks will rile up his cult. However, no further legislation is required. You even quoted the court.Your opinion of what is “required” is irrelevant. Congress is constitutionally empowered to write the law.
How would that be denying reality when he was pursuing the exact course of action that SCOTUS indicates is the only way to enforce the amendment?I would say his reaction is denying the reality of how it was ruled. He’s on to yet another Got Trump
He just want to rile up the brain dead cult who they had promised this scam would get Trump off the ballot.I would say his reaction is denying the reality of how it was ruled. He’s on to yet another Got Trump
You need to go back to screwing and then eating goats because your current diet has you far more addled than your typical addledness.Did he say vague or did he say SCOTUS wasn't clear on whether Trump was or wasn't an insurrectionist and instead left the decision completely up to Congress? You sure you understand the ruling Short Bus? Cause it seems like you doesn't.
No.So lib loons declaring 9-0 is “punting”
What exactly is Raskin proposing? Have you seen it? I haven't.Again, you guys are pissed because Raskin is proposing legislation consistent with constitutional principles.
What exactly is Raskin proposing? Have you seen it? I haven't.
No he didn't.And then just like that, President Trump ceased being an insurrectionist. Fascinating.
Told you,How would that be denying reality when he was pursuing the exact course of action that SCOTUS indicates is the only way to enforce the amendment?
That's not what they did. They said Congress has already acted. Section 2383.No.
But kicking the decision back to Congress to decide what is insurrection and what isn't, is a punt.
Now they will try to sell that a dozen congresspeople will vacate the will of 75million+He just want to rile up the brain dead cult who they had promised this scam would get Trump off the ballot.
