SweetSue92
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
`Conservatives love these "accountability" measures. When they're tied to standardized tests they are laughable. They are generally laughable when tied to humans, but whatever.I often compare them to driver education schools. How bout we did that with driver's training? Let's say we held driver instructor's "accountable" for how their students did on the road. They would correctly cite all kinds of extenuating circumstances, not the least of which is the personal accountability of the driver, not JUST how he/she was taught.But no latitude is given teachers. If the kids aren't producing, it's all on us. Parenting, socioeconomic factors, nothing else comes into play. Those kids are widgets and THEY WILL PRODUCE
I support the teachers. They went to school to learn how to teach, not play nanny, personal counselor, moral instructor, diaper changer, socio-ethical judge, behavior modifier, etc. The good teachers have for the most part, fled the urban public school insanity.
`
I would like to come back to this--first, teachers appreciate this probably more than you could know.
Secondly, if you teach elementary as I do, we accept and don't mind that some of our job comes with teaching young children a LOT of things. I do not like to overlay my specific moral beliefs on other people's children--that is not my right. I'm just talking about the basics of a peaceful society: don't hit your classmates, use words instead. Share your things if you can. Say polite words. Etc. To be honest very few parents have a problem with this and most appreciate when we reinforce these teachings at school.
It's when parents expect that WE are their children's sole moral teachers that the issues get big. No matter how much I love my students, I cannot be their parent. It's just not my role.