After watching the debate between the communist and criminal (for 2 minutes).........

[imawhosure]

"After watching the debate between the communist and criminal (for 2 minutes)........."

You decided to start a thread about it to reaffirm the fact that you're a liar.

Don't get your panties in a wad lib, he was stating an opinion.

I agree, he was just stating an opinion; an opinion shared by most, but still only an opinion-)

Can anyone recall a presidential nominee being investigated by the FBI for crimes this serious? I can't.

Reminds me of an older popular movie Blues, "the not so good, the all bad, and the down right ugly!" That was the name wasn't it? And shouldn't it have been the Democratic mantra before Omalley dropped out-)

 

[PoliticalChic]

"After watching the debate between the communist and criminal (for 2 minutes)........."

You decided to start a thread about it to reaffirm the fact that you're a liar.

Don't get your panties in a wad lib, he was stating an opinion.

I agree, he was just stating an opinion; an opinion shared by most, but still only an opinion-)

Can anyone recall a presidential nominee being investigated by the FBI for crimes this serious? I can't.

But they don't care.....

Lies, corruption, even rape.....nada.....

The Leftists are simply

 

[BluesLegend]

"After watching the debate between the communist and criminal (for 2 minutes)........."

You decided to start a thread about it to reaffirm the fact that you're a liar.

Don't get your panties in a wad lib, he was stating an opinion.

I agree, he was just stating an opinion; an opinion shared by most, but still only an opinion-)

Can anyone recall a presidential nominee being investigated by the FBI for crimes this serious? I can't.

Reminds me of an older popular movie Blues, "the not so good, the all bad, and the down right ugly!" That was the name wasn't it? And shouldn't it have been the Democratic mantra before Omalley dropped out-)

Its a damn strange situation to be sure. Typically drama like this would eliminate a candidate.

 

[Theowl32]

Two versions of Frankenstein's monster created by this president whose party relies on racial divisions for political expediency for over 50 years. In fact the victimology strategy is all they know.

First Frankenstein's monster is isis. Clearly created by this fucking administration in order to take out Asad. Ever notice how many of them are using OUR HUMVEES AND OUR TANKS?

Second version of a Frankenstein monster created by this pitiful administration and the democrats is the blacklivesmatter disaster.

This presidency along with many others in the American hating party should be brought up on charges of high treason. Punishable by death.

 

[imawhosure]

"After watching the debate between the communist and criminal (for 2 minutes)........."

You decided to start a thread about it to reaffirm the fact that you're a liar.

Don't get your panties in a wad lib, he was stating an opinion.

I agree, he was just stating an opinion; an opinion shared by most, but still only an opinion-)

Can anyone recall a presidential nominee being investigated by the FBI for crimes this serious? I can't.

Reminds me of an older popular movie Blues, "the not so good, the all bad, and the down right ugly!" That was the name wasn't it? And shouldn't it have been the Democratic mantra before Omalley dropped out-)

Its a damn strange situation to be sure. Typically drama like this would eliminate a candidate.

Agreed. This shows the arrogance of the DNC. They must believe they can pull this off. They HAVE to believe they can make the GOP candidate look so bad, that Hillary would be a better choice to believe in.

This means everything in total is going to be negative campaigning because in all honesty, the Democrats have no other choice. We know this absolutely by how even Democrats perceive Hillary.

 

[BluesLegend]

Don't get your panties in a wad lib, he was stating an opinion.

I agree, he was just stating an opinion; an opinion shared by most, but still only an opinion-)

Can anyone recall a presidential nominee being investigated by the FBI for crimes this serious? I can't.

Reminds me of an older popular movie Blues, "the not so good, the all bad, and the down right ugly!" That was the name wasn't it? And shouldn't it have been the Democratic mantra before Omalley dropped out-)

Its a damn strange situation to be sure. Typically drama like this would eliminate a candidate.

Agreed. This shows the arrogance of the DNC. They must believe they can pull this off. They HAVE to believe they can make the GOP candidate look so bad, that Hillary would be a better choice to believe in.

This means everything in total is going to be negative campaigning because in all honesty, the Democrats have no other choice. We know this absolutely by how even Democrats perceive Hillary.

Dem's can run on Obama's record...

 

[Flash]

[Q

Now who has been president for the past 7 years? The middle class is worst off now.

When these Libtards try to justify the dumbass decision of voting for Obama they always conveniently forget to mention that poverty has increased, family income has decreased, the debt is astronomical and the welfare rolls are through the roof.

 

[Flash]

[


Dem's can run on Obama's record...

They can if they lie and try to blame Obama's failures on Bush, which is the denial they do.

Democrats are so out of touch with reality that it is pathetic to listen to them.

 

[RodISHI]

The op defends the criminals within the corporate sector screwing America every chance they have. I thought Bernie was 100% right unlike your idiots that want to deregulate everything and let the corporations to continue to fuck over this country.

What is communist about regulating our banks and market??? Every sane nation on earth does it, but I doubt you have the education to understand why.

Don't deal with a bank.

 

[sealybobo]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are spot on!

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful,we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! “The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions…The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right

The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. What's that make you?

Oprah is a traitor to her class. Carson is a traitor to his race and forgot where he came from.

Not all rich people are greedy mean and stupid.

If it weren't for social wedge issues the GOP would offer you nothing.

Republicans say both parties are corrupt. So they realize the rich own both sides.

"The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. What's that make you?"

1. It makes me rich. Unbelievably so.

2. Don't believe all the propaganda attempts to defend the dictator-wannabe, Roosevelt.

He attacked the producers from the start...until reality forced him to grovel to same.

"He started off on the wrong foot when, in his inaugural address, he blamed the Depression on “unscrupulous money changers.” He said nothing about the role of the Fed’s mismanagement and little about the follies of Congress that had contributed to the problem. As a result of his efforts, the economy would linger in depression for the rest of the decade."
Great Myths of the Great Depression | Lawrence W. Reed


But as Dr. Hans Sennholz of Grove City College explains, it was FDR’s policies to come that Americans had genuine reason to fear: In his first 100 days, he swung hard at the profit order. Instead of clearing away the prosperity barriers erected by his predecessor, he built new ones of his own. He struck in every known way at the integrity of the U.S. dollar through quantitative increases and qualitative deterioration. He seized the people’s gold holdings and subsequently devalued the dollar by 40 percent.
Hans F. Sennholz, “The Great Depression,” The Freeman, April 1975, p. 210.

If you are rich, do not tell us we are wrong for not voting like you do, you fucking dummy. PS. Liar.

 

[sealybobo]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are stupid. The GOP is the party for the rich. Just because some rich people are Democrats doesn't mean that the GOP and all of their policies aren't for rich people. What it means is that those rich people agree with us that the GOP is not fair to the middle class or poor people

Now who has been president for the past 7 years? The middle class is worst off now.

Do I really have to explain this to you guys again, over and over? Fuck that. Stupid bitch.

 

[jknowgood]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are stupid. The GOP is the party for the rich. Just because some rich people are Democrats doesn't mean that the GOP and all of their policies aren't for rich people. What it means is that those rich people agree with us that the GOP is not fair to the middle class or poor people

Now who has been president for the past 7 years? The middle class is worst off now.

Do I really have to explain this to you guys again, over and over? Fuck that. Stupid bitch.

Facts are facts. Something liberals cannot stand.

 

[Unkotare]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are spot on!

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful,we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! “The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions…The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right

The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. .

That fucking scumbag fdr was a traitor to AMERICA.

 

[Unkotare]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are spot on!

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful,we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! “The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions…The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right

Oprah is a traitor to her class. Carson is a traitor to his race and forgot where he came from.
.

Spoken like a typical leftist idiot.

 

[Unkotare]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are stupid. The GOP is the party for the rich. Just because some rich people are Democrats doesn't mean that the GOP and all of their policies aren't for rich people. What it means is that those rich people agree with us that the GOP is not fair to the middle class or poor people

Holy shit you're stupid, fish.

 

[kwc57]

The op defends the criminals within the corporate sector screwing America every chance they have. I thought Bernie was 100% right unlike your idiots that want to deregulate everything and let the corporations to continue to fuck over this country.

What is communist about regulating our banks and market??? Every sane nation on earth does it, but I doubt you have the education to understand why.

So you will not vote for the clinton? Oh you will? You fucking moron.

Who repealed Glass Steagall? Hmmmmm? You are a fucking hack.

This country corporate tax rates are higher than any place on the planet.

Notice how China is not on there or other countries that has CHEAP LABOR (behind communist governments that REDISTRIBUTE THEIR WEALTH). Yeah, interestingly enough countries like those signed a NON BINDING CONTRACT on the so called "man made global warming" agreement. Meaning, those countries that have that cheap labor FOR THE WORLD does not need to follow the "new laws" and the world will not enforce those countries that signed a NON BINDING contract.

This country taxes the hell out of our corporations. The rich already pay WAY MORE THAN THEIR FUCKING "FAIR SHARE"

LOL at the fucking left wing voting base falling for the socialist talking points.

FAIR SHARE!!
Tax the rich!!!

You all suck

So the rich should pay less and be allowed to increase the gap between rich and poor even further?

How big should that gap be before you'll be happy? Which side of that gap will you be on? How rich are you?

So the farmer with 40 acres gets a bigger crop yield than the farmer with 1 acre. Is the farmer with 40 acres supposed to give the 1 acre farmer part of his crop to "even" things out? Do you guys ever use logic and reason or is it always emotion and sentiment?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The op defends the criminals within the corporate sector screwing America every chance they have. I thought Bernie was 100% right unlike your idiots that want to deregulate everything and let the corporations to continue to fuck over this country.

What is communist about regulating our banks and market??? Every sane nation on earth does it, but I doubt you have the education to understand why.

If they are criminals charge them & put them in prison. Otherwise shut the fuck up with this ignorant bullshit

 

[sealybobo]

Do you know fucking liberals still think the republicans are the "party of the rich?"

How do democrats get away with such utter bullshit? How do they get away with it? How can the left wing voting base be this stupid?

How?

You are spot on!

1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
   1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
   2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
   3. “They're for the powerful,we're for the people!” Al Gore, http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&gs_mss=Al%20Gore%3A%20They&pq=obtunded%20definition&cp=38&gs_id=6g&xhr=t&q=Al%20Gore%3A%20They're%20for%20the%20powerful%3B%20we're%20for%20the%20people&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=Al+Gore:+They're+for+the+powerful%3B+we're+for+the+people&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=708bd950daecd80b&biw=1152&bih=773
2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! “The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin [p. 8]
   1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).

i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.

i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
   1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions…The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right

The rich called fdr a traitor to his class. .

That fucking scumbag fdr was a traitor to AMERICA.

This is why I believe you are Asian

 

[Arianrhod]

Must suck to go through life looking for things to piss you off every day.

That seems to be the OP's entire M.O.

 

[Theowl32]

Every thread I start conclusively shows why all left wing losers are demented piles of shit and why i hate them.

This thread especially.