Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why didn't Trump live-tweet the Comey hearing?
WHY?
"House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes said Sunday that there is “no evidence” of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government during the presidential campaign.'
So now will snowflakes PLEASE STFU with the FAKE NEWS, ALL-IN Liberal BUTT-HURT Conspiracy BS?!
There never was 'collusion', and the Russians never 'hacked the election'. They hacked piss-poor incompetently cyber-security-protected DNC E-mails that did not reveal anything people didn't already know about the Democrats (they cheat during primaries / elections and are a bunch od racists, sexists, homophobes, and anti-Semites)!
BUT THERE WAS A CRIME / CRIMES COMMITTED...BY DEMOCRATS / ONAMA 'HOLD-OVERS' / SNOWFLAKES:
"The California Republican told Fox News’ Chris Wallace that the only crime there is evidence for is the leaking of the names of Americans who were caught up in surveillance, such as former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn."
FIND THEM AND THROW THEIR ASSES IN JAIL!
Intel Committee Chair: ‘No Evidence’ Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign And Russians
Get some evidence 1st....Collusion will bring down the Trump presidency
I agree, snowflakes like you need to STFU with your butt-hurt.
Top Intel Democrat: 'Circumstantial evidence of collusion' between Trump and Russia
"I was surprised to see Director Clapper say that because I don't think you can make that claim categorically as he did. I would characterize it this way at the outset of the investigation: There is circumstantial evidence of collusion. There is direct evidence, I think, of deception and that's where we begin the investigation."
huh, where have you been for seven months?James Comey just admitted that Russia didn't change ANY votes in swing states Trump won! This means his win is valid.
James Comey cannot know the unknowable. Trump might have won without the hacked e-mails but he might not have. Trump himself made a big deal of the e-mails so he thought they would influence voters to either vote for him or stay home. He certainly encouraged the release of these hacked e-mails.
There may never be direct evidence of it but it does not mean that it did not happen. If the burglars had not been caught Watergate never would have happened. Nunes is a Trump sycophant so he certainly would try to help Trump.
what is that exactly?Gowdy is tearing them up!
He's crying about leakers rather than the actual subject of the investigation. Can't blame him. It's pretty damning stuff.
If you ignore the NSA's records of 'electronic surveillance' of Trump and his family.Meanwhile:
No evidence to support Trump's claim of wire tapping by President Obama
Thank you - 'circumstantial'...as in NO DIRECT< SMOKING-GUN, HARD, SOLID EVIDENCE. All snowflakes have is accusation and Conspiracy Theory BS!There is circumstantial evidence of collusion.
Again, Hacking DNC e-mails is NOT 'hacking the election'. Such an act is not even LOOSELY related to 'hacking the election'. Hacking the DNC's e-mails is a spate event that happened during an election that cast a bad light on Democrats!
It's B U L L S H I T!
So? Circumstantial is still evidence and can still be quite convincing, especially when paired with DIRECT EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S ADMIN LYING about it.
Starskey, can you answer the question?What exactly is that circumstantial evidence?Thank you - 'circumstantial'...as in NO DIRECT< SMOKING-GUN, HARD, SOLID EVIDENCE. All snowflakes have is accusation and Conspiracy Theory BS!There is circumstantial evidence of collusion.
Again, Hacking DNC e-mails is NOT 'hacking the election'. Such an act is not even LOOSELY related to 'hacking the election'. Hacking the DNC's e-mails is a spate event that happened during an election that cast a bad light on Democrats!
It's B U L L S H I T!
So? Circumstantial is still evidence and can still be quite convincing, especially when paired with DIRECT EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S ADMIN LYING about it.
Certainly. I need to ask though, why can't you?
There are multiple Trump people meeting multiple times with Russian officials at critical times within the timeline of the hacking, some with prior knowledge of information that was to be released.
Follow that with the fact that all of them, including Trump, have claimed no knowledge of meetings during the campaign.
That has been shown to be false and is certainly grounds for further investigation.
Sometimes criminals get away with it. OJ did. Trump may have.
Starskey, can you answer the question?What exactly is that circumstantial evidence?Thank you - 'circumstantial'...as in NO DIRECT< SMOKING-GUN, HARD, SOLID EVIDENCE. All snowflakes have is accusation and Conspiracy Theory BS!
Again, Hacking DNC e-mails is NOT 'hacking the election'. Such an act is not even LOOSELY related to 'hacking the election'. Hacking the DNC's e-mails is a spate event that happened during an election that cast a bad light on Democrats!
It's B U L L S H I T!
So? Circumstantial is still evidence and can still be quite convincing, especially when paired with DIRECT EVIDENCE OF TRUMP'S ADMIN LYING about it.
Certainly. I need to ask though, why can't you?
There are multiple Trump people meeting multiple times with Russian officials at critical times within the timeline of the hacking, some with prior knowledge of information that was to be released.
Follow that with the fact that all of them, including Trump, have claimed no knowledge of meetings during the campaign.
That has been shown to be false and is certainly grounds for further investigation.
If the answer was "I don't remember" or "I don't recall" was grounds for a criminal indictment, Hillary would be serving 20 years to life.
I am so tired of hearing this Russia BS. Democrats got pounded because they hate America, hate Americans, and lie about everything.