SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
You mean the 30 years of accurate temperature predictions? The correct predictions of the heat balance, the polar amplification, the stratospheric cooling and tropospheric warming, the squeezing down of the outward IR radiation in the CO2 bands?
There have been no years of accurate temperature predictions...the fact that the predictions remain off even after 30 years of constant tweaking of the models should clue you in but you are so far in denial that you can't see the truth when it is right in your face.
That's why AGW science has such credibility, because it's been making falsifiable predictions for decades, and seeing those predictions come true over and over.
Falsifiable predictions? Are you kidding?? More snow less snow....more rain less rain....more tropical storms fewer tropical storms...more tornadoes fewer tornadoes...colder winters warmer winters...and on and on and on. No matter what the climate does, climate science claims it has predicted it and I guess they did because their claim is that everyting is due to manmade climate change even though there doesn't exist the first scrap of hard evidence that man is causing the global climate to change.
In contrast, your crank science specializes in avoiding predictions of any sort. That's why your side has no credibility.
My science? I have been quoting the second law of thermodynamics and you have been denying it. I am afraid that you are the denier here...willing to belive that one of the fundamental laws of nature is in error so that you can continue to hold your cult beliefs.
Last edited: