ThoughtCrimes
Old Navy Vet
You've NEVER managed that, twit! What you do really well when you've been caught out in your lies and distortions is you just don't respond or respond with something totally irrelevant, like with some of my posts on YOUR thread "Religious Liberty and the Nation".That's what she does; deflects, dodges and dances to avoid addressing her perfidy! She is a sick puppy!And, once again, a dolt rushes in to prove this statement:
"Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter
Aaaaaaaand back to copy and pasting other people's woprds because yoou have none of your own. You could actually be a bot.
1. Copy and paste is a dodge that the cowardly use to avoid the facts presented.
2. You claimed that one of my posts was based on 'obscrurely worded' polls. I challenged you to document same....you ran and hid.
3. You posted in another missive that there were 'rightwing lies.' And I challenged same...and again you ran off, because you were the liar.
Correct so far?
I doubt you've been right ever.
I'm sure there are liberal copy and past spam sites that refute the right wing copy and paste sites that you spam the board with but I'm not going to depress everyone with another heap of garbage, that's your job.
I did notice in your mountains of drivel a claim that a significant number of British Muslims support ISIS.
That turned out to be a lie. By way of an obscurely worded poll.
No, one in five Muslims does not support Isis
No? Let's take another one.
· 38.6 percent of Western Muslims believe 9/11 attacks were justified. Gallup(2011).
Shit! And Gallup is a proper organization. Only the link is to an opinion blog about a book that Gallup helped the preparation of and written by someone Elder of Ziyon. Well that's bound to be balanced and fair.
You turbo post so much spam that you think the weight of it makes up for the poor quality of it's source material. You want to know why Obama doesn't want the word ISLAM splashed across anti terrorism literature? Because the feeling of disenfranchisment to the Muslim population is what causes people to turn to radical views. Because if you scream in someone's face long enough then they will start to hate you.
"I'm sure there are liberal copy and past spam sites that refute the right wing copy and paste sites that you spam the board with but I'm not going to depress everyone with another heap of garbage, that's your job."
And....there we have the Liberal white flag.....
How is that a white flag you mentalist!?!
I notice you didnt even bother to adress when I pointed out your "facts" were horseshit.
Now, haven't I put you in your place often enough, dunce???
You just ignore to save face (you believe...anything to keep from admitting you've screwed the pooch) OR you bluster and pretend thinking that stating the opposite makes it true and call the other a liar when it is nothing but another of your own repetitious and disgusting perversions of the truth you lying IDIOT. And you know what I told you I'd do when you lie or accuse another of lying, so here it comes for your latest chastisement, Chica;
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
You even lie about never lying, Chica! You don't have an honest bone in your body!
In your post #436 above [ Why Liberals Hate Free Speech | Page 44 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum ], you cited this quote from http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No2_Rehnquist.pdf.
"[Liberal judicial activism] seems instead to be based upon the proposition that federal judges, perhaps judges as a whole, have a role of their own,
quite independent of popular will, to play in solving society’s problems."
But you didn't faithfully reproduce the quote which actually read:
"The brief writer’s version seems instead to be based upon the proposition that federal judges, perhaps judges as a whole, have a role of their own, quite independent of popular will, to play in solving society’s problems."
The underlined portions in both quotes above display the difference. In the original, in blue font, the author was speaking about the case brief's written by LAWYERS. But that didn't jive with your desired narrative so you edited, read that as LIED, it to shift the subject from LAWYERS to JUDGES, with your bracketed "Liberal judicial activism". That is changing truth to falsehood or in common English, LYING! You altered Rehnquist's entire meaning and intent to play the alter quote into your game by LYING. That is not only lying, but truly despicable dishonesty and conduct.
I understand why you didn't respond to my post #441 [ Why Liberals Hate Free Speech | Page 45 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum ] which disclosed this same dishonest conduct. I would have let it go until I read the post to which I'm responding [ Why Liberals Hate Free Speech | Page 45 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum post #448 ] proclaiming that you "never lie". You are an utterly disgustingly flawed person. Oh and you can expect to see this post showing up each and every time you claim that you "never lie", LIAR!
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
I could add more after that similar stunt you pulled yesterday or the day before, but I think I'll just leave that hanging like Damocles' sword will suffice for now you bloody narcissistic, pseudointellectual phony!