Porter Rockwell
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2018
- 6,088
- 666
- 140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #481
post: 23926068,According to Frank Lambert, Professor of History at Purdue University, the assurances in Article 11 {this disputed sentence where the Treaty said we were not a Christian nation} were "intended to allay the fears of the Muslim state by insisting that religion would not govern how the treaty was interpreted and enforced."
That does not durable anything I wrote. If you think it does you will have to explain it in better than your usual general unspecific way.
Well, your response is not in English. It is a deflection. AND, you are trying to lie once again about what this thread is about.
I have stipulated as has every person that has posted favorable posts on this that AMERICA WAS NOT FOUNDED AS A THEOCRACY.
Since I began this thread, I am the one who is defining what is meant by a Christian nation when we are not a theocracy. That you cannot disprove the proposition put forth AND that nobody except you is arguing on behalf of a theocracy, makes you look stupid.
Now, I've been so courteous as to answer your questions and tell you that this is not an argument about a theocracy. If you fail to comprehend that by now, you are an idiot. Your debunked theories have been laid to rest; my many links have met your objections and thrown many a curve ball that you did not expect - and did not bother to respond to. The reason? You realize you got spanked. I'd like to quote something out of my last link and leave you with that:
"Those who cite the Treaty of Tripoli as evidence that this nation was not founded on the Christian religion, usually ignore the Treaty of Paris of 1783. This Treaty, negotiated by Ben Franklin and John Adams among others, is truly a foundational document for the United States, because by this Treaty Britian recognized the independence of the United States. The Treaty begins with the words, "In the Name of the most holy and undivided Trinity... ," and there is no dispute about its validity or its wording."
You cited the Treaty of Tripoli and it got debunked. Now not only did I debunk your Treaty and what really happened, you were given something equally valid. You cannot address it. From here on out, you can expect a beat down.