gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 68,221
- 36,465
- 2,605
Apparently you fail to comprehend.He cries about the money spent, and that it should be cut by at least half.
As most of that budget goes to things like pay, housing and taking care of dependents, that is what it would mean. The next biggest chunk actually goes to training. Not that they are training much at the moment, as they are still under almost two decade old budget restrictions.
I read it, and it was the typical political nonsense, much like yours. Now care to actually discuss what that would actually mean to those in uniform? Or are you as always going to go into political coprolite once again and avoid actual discussions?
We don’t need all this manpower in the military. So if they aren’t members of the military, there is no need to pay them.
Do you somehow think the current level of personnel in the military is sacrosanct?