Renowned attorney comments on new indictment against Trump

[struth]

According to the SCOTUS, Biden can go talk to Jack Smith about this case and it then becomes part of his presdential duties to indict and convict Trump.

What? What a weird post. Of course it’s the presidents job to seek convictions of crimes. The issue here is, prior to xiden and harris no president has used their office to criminalize political rivals

 

[Blaster]

Your guy inserted his fingers into E Jean Carroll's vagina.

It would take a jar of vasoline to be able to put anything into that dry, smelly hole.

 

[Blaster]

Turkey sold out to Fox News several years ago.

Turley is a Democrat and well respected among his peers.

 

[struth]

Turley is a Democrat and well respected among his peers.

Very true. He’s however been attacked by the demafasict that took over the dem party, for calling out their assault on democracy

 

[Shareprofit]

It would take a jar of vasoline to be able to put anything into that dry, smelly hole.

It makes you wonder why Trump bothered. Probably more of the thrill of subjecting an innocent woman to humiliation. It was a power thing for Trump. To think you MAGA approve of that sort of behaviour.

 

[Lesh]

What? What a weird post. Of course it’s the presidents job to seek convictions of crimes. The issue here is, prior to xiden and harris no president has used their office to criminalize political rivals

You might wanna go back to Bush the Lesser and Carl fucking Rove and Don Seigelman

 

[struth]

You might wanna go back to Bush the Lesser and Carl fucking Rove and Don Seigelman

What? Are you trying to make a point? So weird

 

[Lesh]

What? Are you trying to make a point? So weird

You’re not even good at trolling. Hard as you may try

 

[struth]

You’re not even good at trolling. Hard as you may try

An even weirder post

 

[Care4all]

Jonathan Turley: The Supreme Court will have problems with this indictment | Fox News Video

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to the special filing a new indictment in the election subversion case against former President Trump on 'Special Report.'

www.foxnews.com

I just now heard of this a couple hours ago. Basically, this nut Jack Smith (who was not supposed to be bringing the original case!) re-did the old indictment after the Supreme Ct ruled that presidents have immunity from lawsuits when they are (my words) working in their capacity as a president.

The Vice President was not taken out of the indictment as a witness because VP Pence was acting as the President of the Senate, and not as VP.....Turley failed to mention that.... that's why he is wrong.

 

[struth]

The Vice President was not taken out of the indictment as a witness because VP Pence was acting as the President of the Senate, and not as VP.....Turley failed to mention that.... that's why he is wrong.

The VP was being the VP and performing his duty as VP when acting as the President of the Senate.


That’s literally the VP’s cosntitutionally mandated jobs

 

[Care4all]

The VP was being the VP and performing his duty as VP when acting as the President of the Senate.


That’s literally the VP’s cosntitutionally mandated jobs

And has nothing what so ever to do with the President's duties.