bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,268
- 9,692
I find it interesting, and not in a good way, that people would somehow approve of Putin's appropriation of territory. It's not like the Ukraine didn't allow Russia it's bases in the Crimea, and the Ukraine actually benefitted from it.
Russia has used its military to ostensibly scare a country away from economic ties to the EU. That's all this was ever about. Russia has and always had the Crimea. Whether the EU and Nato act proactively to fully integrate the Ukraine and other former "republics" of the Soviets remains to be seen.
All this was ever about was a trade agreement.
No not a trade agreement. Putin couldn't have a miniature Czech rep or Poland on his doorstep. The question now is whether the US and EU will commit to the Ukraine and whether the Ukranians are capable of building a republic based on private ownership of property and individual rights. He bet his indisbutable treaty rights to the Crimea on the Ukraine. But it turned out that he'd have had to kill a lot of Ukranians. So, he's left with a less than legal claim to the Ukraine.
If the Ukraine can flourish, Putin will have failed.
Last edited: