And now on to the more serious question of immunity. . .

SCOTUS should rule a President has immunity in conduct of his office

  • Yes

  • No

  • I don't care or have an opinion


Results are only viewable after voting.
Um, no. Two of the 4 counts are 18 USC 1512, obstruction. The other two counts are conspiracy charges.

Toss out the obstruction, the conspiracy charges melt away.
Nope. Toss out those two charges and the fraud and conspiracy against rights are completely unaffected.
 
What Trump did to the country after the 2020 election was wrong, and criminal. All I want is accountability so no one ever tries that bullshit again.
The terrorist wing of the democrat party caused way more damage to the American people in 2020 than on Jan 6th. Save your crocodile tears for some naive college kids.
 
The terrorist wing of the democrat party caused way more damage to the American people in 2020 than on Jan 6th. Save your crocodile tears for some naive college kids.
This opinion is completely irrelevant to Trump’s prosecution.
 
Only according to Trump cultists. Both of Trump's impeachents were for high crimes supported by a mountain of evidence. But the senators are beholden to his cult.
Yeah, well the first thing they teach you in Extortion 101 is the guy you are extorting has to know he is being extorted.

J6 was a demonstration that became a riot because the Capitol Police were unprepared and let it get out of hand. Anyone who was breathing in 2020 knew there were going to be instigators there.
40 years ago he would have been shamed and tossed from office by any senate, democrat or republican.
40 years ago they would never even have contemplated impeachment.
 
Nope. Toss out those two charges and the fraud and conspiracy against rights are completely unaffected.
If it was not obstruction of an official proceeding (1512), there was no conspiracy to obstruct (371). And the conspiracy against voting (241) goes away, because that charge relies on the obstruction of the official proceeding (counting the votes).

The obstruction charges underpin the entire case.
 
Youre in denial.

Trump’s actiond to overturn the election crossed the line.

You will either attempt to distract and change the subject or pretend it never happened.
Wrong. Trump wanted the certification halted until after an investigation.
 
If it was not obstruction of an official proceeding (1512), there was no conspiracy to obstruct (371). And the conspiracy against voting (241) goes away, because that charge relies on the obstruction of the official proceeding (counting the votes).

The obstruction charges underpin the entire case.
The argument is that 1512 doesn’t apply to this particular congressional proceeding.

The argument is not that the count wasn’t obstructed.

371 is conspiracy to defraud, not to obstruct.

241 goes well beyond interrupting the vote count and includes his attempt to sway state officials, the fake electors and corrupt acts with the DoJ.
 
The argument is that 1512 doesn’t apply to this particular congressional proceeding.

The argument is not that the count wasn’t obstructed.

371 is conspiracy to defraud, not to obstruct.

241 goes well beyond interrupting the vote count and includes his attempt to sway state officials, the fake electors and corrupt acts with the DoJ.
Notice how you have to spend 90% of your time correcting these people, instead of making your own points.
 
Youre in denial.

Trump’s actiond to overturn the election crossed the line.

You will either attempt to distract and change the subject or pretend it never happened.
So 0-9 is winning or positive reinforcement for libs?
 
The Constitution calls for the US Government to ensure a Republican Form of Government to all the States

Trump, and about 80 MILLION other people thought there was some funny business in the '20 election. Mostly because -- There was.

What could be more important than POTUS making sure that elections are fair and honest?

Not trying to re-hash an old topic but they weren't. Everybody knows it but there's nothing we could do about then and -- We still can't go back and change it.

Even if we did prove it -- Then what? Nothing.

Trump wanted Congress and some States to look at the elections in several States. What the FUCK is wrong with that?

I'll tell you -- dimocrap filth cheated like the scum you are and you didn't want to get busted for it.

The ultimate defense. SCOTUS rules 6-3 in Trump's favor.

Keep on keepin' on, dimocrap scum. You're creating a monster. Maybe even one that I won't like.

That's the problem with you people, you just don't know when to shut the fuck up.
Epic rant! You didn't answer a single question!
But what you did do is prove your HATRED of anyone not like you is worthy of analysis by professionals.
Don't break your arm patting yourself on the back!😂😂😂
 

Forum List

Back
Top