And now the Dictatorship begins

[BluesLegend]

And now the Dictatorship begins

When the left's thread title is a blatant lie they have already lost the debate.

 

[hadit]

Vindman is not the first American hero Republicans have slandered.

Guess which one of these two Republicans swear was sent by God to lead them?

Liberals want God removed from every part of our lives, yet you want me to side with a man solely because he's a churchgoer? Hypocrite much? LOL

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

Wow, so now you can read minds too....Amazing.

They seem to believe those foil helmets they order out of the backs of their comic books really work

 

[jasonnfree]

I know trump's supporters are ecstatic with joy over his victory however.....what would these god fearing patriots do if ordinary law breakers started getting the breaks that this criminal trump received due to precedent? No more testimony by eye witnesses allowed for example.

 

[Papageorgio]

Vindman is not the first American hero Republicans have slandered.

Guess which one of these two Republicans swear was sent by God to lead them?

Liberals want God removed from every part of our lives, yet you want me to side with a man solely because he's a churchgoer? Hypocrite much? LOL

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

Two House Democrats saw the impeachment for what it was and voted no to the impeachment.

 

[The Original Tree]

Trump is a dictator USMB Troll Thread 10,275

 

[hadit]

I know trump's supporters are ecstatic with joy over his victory however.....what would these god fearing patriots do if ordinary law breakers started getting the breaks that this criminal trump received due to precedent? No more testimony by eye witnesses allowed for example.

The House had the means and opportunity to get it, but refused. That was weak.

 

[Papageorgio]

Liberals want God removed from every part of our lives, yet you want me to side with a man solely because he's a churchgoer? Hypocrite much? LOL

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

They voted the way the Constitution meant them to. he was not guilty of impeachment

He was already guilty of Impeachment. He's going to be guilty of impeachment forever. The ONLY question that the senate had to answer was , was it serious enough to remove him from office. He was not exonerated since he was already found guilty. The Senated voted not on his guilt or innocents but that there was insufficient evidence for removal from office. It's that simple. We all can make it difficult but it's pretty simple.

Liberals want God removed from every part of our lives, yet you want me to side with a man solely because he's a churchgoer? Hypocrite much? LOL

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

They voted the way the Constitution meant them to. he was not guilty of impeachment

He was already guilty of Impeachment. He's going to be guilty of impeachment forever. The ONLY question that the senate had to answer was , was it serious enough to remove him from office. He was not exonerated since he was already found guilty. The Senated voted not on his guilt or innocents but that there was insufficient evidence for removal from office. It's that simple. We all can make it difficult but it's pretty simple.

The impeachment is like a charge, the House charged Trump with two offenses. Then the Senate conducts a trial. You are convicted or acquitted by the Senate.

So, one can not be guilty of impeachment.

It is simple however you got it wrong.

 

[Papageorgio]

No one has yet proved that Trump is a dictator. The Op seems to have ran away.

 

[daveman]

Liberals want God removed from every part of our lives, yet you want me to side with a man solely because he's a churchgoer? Hypocrite much? LOL

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

it's not a good argument.

If there was enough Republicans that truly felt Trump was a threat to the United States, they would have communicated in private and public that they were going to join the Dems and remove him with a 2/3 vote. And Trump would be gone, no fear to be had.

I wished that was the case. But it's not. And I don't think a 2/3rds vote could be achieved but a more than 50 could have been achieved. There was a lot of threats in the background. And watching the backlash on Romney, they tried to make an example of him. It didn't work. But the other Republican Senators placed their jobs and positions over their voters best wishes. And why would they do this when voting for the witnesses and additional evidence? The reasons for omitting those never made any sense. In fact, nothing about Rump makes a lot of sense.

Rump has lost the ability to back up his threats like he once did but those Senators are so much in love with their power and jobs they can't take the chance. Even to come with a simple majority for someone as bad as Rump. And, no, I am not preaching for removal from office. What I am wanting to see is for Rump to be slapped down a few times as a message that his BS won't be tolerated anymore.

Yeah, he needs to learn he should quietly accept people telling lies about him and trying to overturn a legal election!

What you want is utterly immaterial, and you will not get it.

 

[daveman]

I know trump's supporters are ecstatic with joy over his victory however.....what would these god fearing patriots do if ordinary law breakers started getting the breaks that this criminal trump received due to precedent? No more testimony by eye witnesses allowed for example.

You mean like Democrats who don't get investigated or prosecuted?

 

[j-mac]

I know trump's supporters are ecstatic with joy over his victory however.....what would these god fearing patriots do if ordinary law breakers started getting the breaks that this criminal trump received due to precedent? No more testimony by eye witnesses allowed for example.

You do understand that this wasn't a criminal trial right?

 

[Vastator]

Sure enough, the day after the republicans allowed this asshole unchecked power, he begins to pull a Vladimir Putin.

Trump lambastes his critics as he moves to target perceived enemies over impeachment
By Josh Dawsey, Robert Costa and Greg Miller
February 6 at 11:42 PM

President Trump is preparing to push out a national security official who testified against him during the impeachment inquiry after he expressed deep anger on Thursday over the attempt to remove him from office because of his actions toward Ukraine.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman — a National Security Council aide who testified during House Democrats’ impeachment hearings — will be informed in the coming days, likely on Friday, by administration officials that he is being reassigned to a position at the Defense Department, taking a key figure from the investigation out of the White House, according to two people familiar with the move who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss personnel decisions.

Vindman had already informed senior officials at the NSC that he intended to take an early exit from his assignment and leave his post by the end of the month, according to people familiar with his decision, but Trump is eager to make a symbol of the Army officer soon after the Senate acquitted him of the impeachment charges approved by House Democrats.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1003a0-4924-11ea-9475-535736e48788_story.html

You chose poorly...

 

[Vastator]

If the democrats are losing it now, I can't wait for November!!
Screaming pussies, pussy hats, weeping and gnashing of teeth, the MSM going nuts, CNN & MSDNC going even more negative, etc.
Trump calmly replaces RBG with Amy Coney Barrett, then replaces Breyer, then replaces Thomas, all while the MSM and dems go crazy.

A number of the vaunted Leftist media outlets have taken note of the political wind; and which way it’s blowing. A number of them have softened their stance against Trump; and are slowly tailoring their product to the the popular desire of the American people...

 

[Shawnee_b]

You like the part about DIC don't you. Admit it

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

it's not a good argument.

If there was enough Republicans that truly felt Trump was a threat to the United States, they would have communicated in private and public that they were going to join the Dems and remove him with a 2/3 vote. And Trump would be gone, no fear to be had.

I wished that was the case. But it's not.

Why? Because you didn't get the vote that you wanted?

And I don't think a 2/3rds vote could be achieved but a more than 50 could have been achieved.

Oh? Can you list those that you think should have voted in favor to remove, then tell us why you think they didn't?

There was a lot of threats in the background.

Do you have documented evidence of this, or is it just what you think happened?

And watching the backlash on Romney, they tried to make an example of him. It didn't work.

Make an example? How so?

But the other Republican Senators placed their jobs and positions over their voters best wishes.

That would be more of a voter thing....You do realize that you are arguing against your "retribution" argument when you type this right?

And why would they do this when voting for the witnesses and additional evidence?

It's not up to the jury to make the case...That was the House's job...They failed.

The reasons for omitting those never made any sense.

The Senate allowed everything the House managers brought to them....They omitted nothing.

In fact, nothing about Rump makes a lot of sense.

Which is why you people will loose in November. Oh, and mistyping Trump's name make you feel better?

Rump has lost the ability to back up his threats like he once did but those Senators are so much in love with their power and jobs they can't take the chance.

What is it exactly you think the President could do to them had they voted to remove him?

Even to come with a simple majority for someone as bad as Rump.

Your problem seems to be that you think everyone else believes the way that you do...

And, no, I am not preaching for removal from office.

HA!!!! That's a hoot!

What I am wanting to see is for Rump to be slapped down a few times as a message that his BS won't be tolerated anymore.

Wise up man...This President isn't doing anything that would please you people, Hell, he could have a cure for cancer, and you would probably post that he is destroying jobs in the Pharma industry.

Simple response. Rump IS Cancer and the cure for that form of cancer is to remove Rump.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

They voted the way the Constitution meant them to. he was not guilty of impeachment

He was already guilty of Impeachment. He's going to be guilty of impeachment forever. The ONLY question that the senate had to answer was , was it serious enough to remove him from office. He was not exonerated since he was already found guilty. The Senated voted not on his guilt or innocents but that there was insufficient evidence for removal from office. It's that simple. We all can make it difficult but it's pretty simple.

And yet, when one Republican Senator votes within the teachings of his God then he's obviously a sinner.

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

They voted the way the Constitution meant them to. he was not guilty of impeachment

He was already guilty of Impeachment. He's going to be guilty of impeachment forever. The ONLY question that the senate had to answer was , was it serious enough to remove him from office. He was not exonerated since he was already found guilty. The Senated voted not on his guilt or innocents but that there was insufficient evidence for removal from office. It's that simple. We all can make it difficult but it's pretty simple.

The impeachment is like a charge, the House charged Trump with two offenses. Then the Senate conducts a trial. You are convicted or acquitted by the Senate.

So, one can not be guilty of impeachment.

It is simple however you got it wrong.

Rump is Impeached. Simple as that. The Senate voted that there wasn't enough evidence to remove him from office. You can't change the fact that Rump is impeached. Get over it.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

I wonder how many Democrats wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way that truly wanted

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

it's not a good argument.

If there was enough Republicans that truly felt Trump was a threat to the United States, they would have communicated in private and public that they were going to join the Dems and remove him with a 2/3 vote. And Trump would be gone, no fear to be had.

I wished that was the case. But it's not.

Why? Because you didn't get the vote that you wanted?

And I don't think a 2/3rds vote could be achieved but a more than 50 could have been achieved.

Oh? Can you list those that you think should have voted in favor to remove, then tell us why you think they didn't?

There was a lot of threats in the background.

Do you have documented evidence of this, or is it just what you think happened?

And watching the backlash on Romney, they tried to make an example of him. It didn't work.

Make an example? How so?

But the other Republican Senators placed their jobs and positions over their voters best wishes.

That would be more of a voter thing....You do realize that you are arguing against your "retribution" argument when you type this right?

And why would they do this when voting for the witnesses and additional evidence?

It's not up to the jury to make the case...That was the House's job...They failed.

The reasons for omitting those never made any sense.

The Senate allowed everything the House managers brought to them....They omitted nothing.

In fact, nothing about Rump makes a lot of sense.

Which is why you people will loose in November. Oh, and mistyping Trump's name make you feel better?

Rump has lost the ability to back up his threats like he once did but those Senators are so much in love with their power and jobs they can't take the chance.

What is it exactly you think the President could do to them had they voted to remove him?

Even to come with a simple majority for someone as bad as Rump.

Your problem seems to be that you think everyone else believes the way that you do...

And, no, I am not preaching for removal from office.

HA!!!! That's a hoot!

What I am wanting to see is for Rump to be slapped down a few times as a message that his BS won't be tolerated anymore.

Wise up man...This President isn't doing anything that would please you people, Hell, he could have a cure for cancer, and you would probably post that he is destroying jobs in the Pharma industry.

Simple response. Rump IS Cancer and the cure for that form of cancer is to remove Rump.

Then do at the Ballot Box.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The real question is, how many Republicans wish they could have been like Romney and voted the way they truly wanted. Fear can be a powerful tool.

it's not a good argument.

If there was enough Republicans that truly felt Trump was a threat to the United States, they would have communicated in private and public that they were going to join the Dems and remove him with a 2/3 vote. And Trump would be gone, no fear to be had.

I wished that was the case. But it's not.

Why? Because you didn't get the vote that you wanted?

And I don't think a 2/3rds vote could be achieved but a more than 50 could have been achieved.

Oh? Can you list those that you think should have voted in favor to remove, then tell us why you think they didn't?

There was a lot of threats in the background.

Do you have documented evidence of this, or is it just what you think happened?

And watching the backlash on Romney, they tried to make an example of him. It didn't work.

Make an example? How so?

But the other Republican Senators placed their jobs and positions over their voters best wishes.

That would be more of a voter thing....You do realize that you are arguing against your "retribution" argument when you type this right?

And why would they do this when voting for the witnesses and additional evidence?

It's not up to the jury to make the case...That was the House's job...They failed.

The reasons for omitting those never made any sense.

The Senate allowed everything the House managers brought to them....They omitted nothing.

In fact, nothing about Rump makes a lot of sense.

Which is why you people will loose in November. Oh, and mistyping Trump's name make you feel better?

Rump has lost the ability to back up his threats like he once did but those Senators are so much in love with their power and jobs they can't take the chance.

What is it exactly you think the President could do to them had they voted to remove him?

Even to come with a simple majority for someone as bad as Rump.

Your problem seems to be that you think everyone else believes the way that you do...

And, no, I am not preaching for removal from office.

HA!!!! That's a hoot!

What I am wanting to see is for Rump to be slapped down a few times as a message that his BS won't be tolerated anymore.

Wise up man...This President isn't doing anything that would please you people, Hell, he could have a cure for cancer, and you would probably post that he is destroying jobs in the Pharma industry.

Simple response. Rump IS Cancer and the cure for that form of cancer is to remove Rump.

Then do at the Ballot Box.

I have already seen Rump manipulate the Ballot Box. Of course, with the assistance of many in here as well. He all but took out one candidate. Next he goes after 3 others using much the same methods. At some point, the General Public is going to sicken from it. It's like everything else, you can't keep going to the well over and over. But Rump will. It's going to be a very long 10 months for you "The Party of the Rumpers".

 

[The2ndAmendment]

[
I have already seen Rump manipulate the Ballot Box.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

it's not a good argument.

If there was enough Republicans that truly felt Trump was a threat to the United States, they would have communicated in private and public that they were going to join the Dems and remove him with a 2/3 vote. And Trump would be gone, no fear to be had.

I wished that was the case. But it's not.

Why? Because you didn't get the vote that you wanted?

And I don't think a 2/3rds vote could be achieved but a more than 50 could have been achieved.

Oh? Can you list those that you think should have voted in favor to remove, then tell us why you think they didn't?

There was a lot of threats in the background.

Do you have documented evidence of this, or is it just what you think happened?

And watching the backlash on Romney, they tried to make an example of him. It didn't work.

Make an example? How so?

But the other Republican Senators placed their jobs and positions over their voters best wishes.

That would be more of a voter thing....You do realize that you are arguing against your "retribution" argument when you type this right?

And why would they do this when voting for the witnesses and additional evidence?

It's not up to the jury to make the case...That was the House's job...They failed.

The reasons for omitting those never made any sense.

The Senate allowed everything the House managers brought to them....They omitted nothing.

In fact, nothing about Rump makes a lot of sense.

Which is why you people will loose in November. Oh, and mistyping Trump's name make you feel better?

Rump has lost the ability to back up his threats like he once did but those Senators are so much in love with their power and jobs they can't take the chance.

What is it exactly you think the President could do to them had they voted to remove him?

Even to come with a simple majority for someone as bad as Rump.

Your problem seems to be that you think everyone else believes the way that you do...

And, no, I am not preaching for removal from office.

HA!!!! That's a hoot!

What I am wanting to see is for Rump to be slapped down a few times as a message that his BS won't be tolerated anymore.

Wise up man...This President isn't doing anything that would please you people, Hell, he could have a cure for cancer, and you would probably post that he is destroying jobs in the Pharma industry.

Simple response. Rump IS Cancer and the cure for that form of cancer is to remove Rump.

Then do at the Ballot Box.

I have already seen Rump manipulate the Ballot Box. Of course, with the assistance of many in here as well. He all but took out one candidate. Next he goes after 3 others using much the same methods. At some point, the General Public is going to sicken from it. It's like everything else, you can't keep going to the well over and over. But Rump will. It's going to be a very long 10 months for you "The Party of the Rumpers".

I have already seen Rump manipulate the Ballot Box.

Campaigning in states. Getting more votes in those states. Bastard!!

It's going to be a very long 10 months for you "The Party of the Rumpers".

You're touching yourself every time you type rump...….aren't you?