And to think that left continues to demand MORE government

[rightwinger]

People ate, people had housing, people had medical care
How can that be a failure?

Because it didn't produce any positive results.

"If you pay people not to work, don't be too surprised when they don't."
Rush Limbaugh

Or the way I always phrase it, if you pay people to be irresponsible, don't be surprised when you create more irresponsible people.

Sure it creates positive results. People eat, have a place to sleep, get medical care

We also created jobs training, job placement, small business funding, education funding.

Rush Limbaugh is a moron. Increasing the suffering of the poor does nothing to help them

Sure it does. If being irresponsible and doing irresponsible things means you have to pay a price for it, then of course it does great good. It's called Tough Love.

When you reward people for failure, they don't care if they fail or not. No effort to avoid it.

And this is what our social programs do. Why? Because with Democrats, it's all about politics. It's not about helping the populous in general, it's about getting votes and power. So they do the wrong things for people.

Blame the victim

Good thing we just gave tax cuts to billionaires

Yes, good thing they did because several companies gave raises to their working people; some bonuses, some both.

It lowered our unemployment rate to a 50 year low, and more and more are getting off of the dole to work instead of sitting home and collecting money.

Now if you know of any jobs created by poor people, please let me know what they are. Until that time, those evil billionaires and millionaires are the people who create jobs so the rest of us have a way to make a living.

Yes “several”...four percent
The overwhelming number of companies just kept the money

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Because it didn't produce any positive results.

"If you pay people not to work, don't be too surprised when they don't."
Rush Limbaugh

Or the way I always phrase it, if you pay people to be irresponsible, don't be surprised when you create more irresponsible people.

Sure it creates positive results. People eat, have a place to sleep, get medical care

We also created jobs training, job placement, small business funding, education funding.

Rush Limbaugh is a moron. Increasing the suffering of the poor does nothing to help them

Sure it does. If being irresponsible and doing irresponsible things means you have to pay a price for it, then of course it does great good. It's called Tough Love.

When you reward people for failure, they don't care if they fail or not. No effort to avoid it.

And this is what our social programs do. Why? Because with Democrats, it's all about politics. It's not about helping the populous in general, it's about getting votes and power. So they do the wrong things for people.

Blame the victim

Good thing we just gave tax cuts to billionaires

Yes, good thing they did because several companies gave raises to their working people; some bonuses, some both.

It lowered our unemployment rate to a 50 year low, and more and more are getting off of the dole to work instead of sitting home and collecting money.

Now if you know of any jobs created by poor people, please let me know what they are. Until that time, those evil billionaires and millionaires are the people who create jobs so the rest of us have a way to make a living.

Yes “several”...four percent
The overwhelming number of companies just kept the money

So what? Would you rather have nobody getting raises or bonuses?

 

[miketx]

Pretty sure it is you Trump sheep calling for an increase in defense spending


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

After the way the queer president gutted the military we have to do it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And... yeah... you're correct... feeding and housing and educating and helping our own people ends-up paying much bigger dividends...

Regardless of the fact that it's simply the Right Thing To Do...

So do it!!! What’s stopping you?

Why is it that idiot progressives always cry “X is the ‘right’ thing to do” but then they refuse to do “X”?

Are you saying that feeding and housing and educating and training and helping our own people is NOT the 'right thing to do' ?

We have spent more on our military and yet, we still have wars
If military spending works......why are we still fighting?

There has never been a time in history where there was not war somewhere in this world. The difference between war and poverty is we really don't do anything to encourage or promote war.

Interesting point

There has never been a time in history when we didn’t have poverty

True, but massive poverty like we have?

How can you ever minimize or eliminate poverty when we encourage (through our social programs) poverty people making more poor people? Poverty can never be solved that way.

 

[rightwinger]

Sure it creates positive results. People eat, have a place to sleep, get medical care

We also created jobs training, job placement, small business funding, education funding.

Rush Limbaugh is a moron. Increasing the suffering of the poor does nothing to help them

Sure it does. If being irresponsible and doing irresponsible things means you have to pay a price for it, then of course it does great good. It's called Tough Love.

When you reward people for failure, they don't care if they fail or not. No effort to avoid it.

And this is what our social programs do. Why? Because with Democrats, it's all about politics. It's not about helping the populous in general, it's about getting votes and power. So they do the wrong things for people.

Blame the victim

Good thing we just gave tax cuts to billionaires

Yes, good thing they did because several companies gave raises to their working people; some bonuses, some both.

It lowered our unemployment rate to a 50 year low, and more and more are getting off of the dole to work instead of sitting home and collecting money.

Now if you know of any jobs created by poor people, please let me know what they are. Until that time, those evil billionaires and millionaires are the people who create jobs so the rest of us have a way to make a living.

Yes “several”...four percent
The overwhelming number of companies just kept the money

So what? Would you rather have nobody getting raises or bonuses?

I would prefer if business shared their profit with those who created it

 

[rightwinger]

So do it!!! What’s stopping you?

Why is it that idiot progressives always cry “X is the ‘right’ thing to do” but then they refuse to do “X”?

Are you saying that feeding and housing and educating and training and helping our own people is NOT the 'right thing to do' ?

We have spent more on our military and yet, we still have wars
If military spending works......why are we still fighting?

There has never been a time in history where there was not war somewhere in this world. The difference between war and poverty is we really don't do anything to encourage or promote war.

Interesting point

There has never been a time in history when we didn’t have poverty

True, but massive poverty like we have?

How can you ever minimize or eliminate poverty when we encourage (through our social programs) poverty people making more poor people? Poverty can never be solved that way.

How do you solve poverty?
Tax cuts to billionaires?

 

[P@triot]

Are you saying that feeding and housing and educating and training and helping our own people is NOT the 'right thing to do' ?

No - I’m asking why you wont do it? Only an asshole says X, Y, and Z are the “right thing to do” and then turns around and refuses to do X, Y, and Z.

You progressive tools are all the same. You’re free to do everything you whine about 24x7 and yet none of you do it.

 

[P@triot]

How do you solve poverty?

1. Why does poverty need to be solved?
2. Definitely not through government

 

[P@triot]

We help those who need help.

Who is this “we”? You don’t help anyone. You just scream about it so you can continue to collect your handouts at the expense of everyone else.

 

[danielpalos]

Unimaginable and inexcusable ineptitude by our federal government.

An audit conducted by Ernst & Young found that the agency’s accounting procedures are so flawed that there is no reliable way to track how it uses its $40 billion annual budget.

If a private organization was this inept, the left would take to the streets with violence. They would demand all kinds of “regulatory” reforms and legislation. And yet when it happens with tax payer dollars, all they do is shrug and insist that we need more government.

Major Pentagon agency can’t account for $800 million — but still may get a budget increase

lol. why blame the left; what happened to "tax cut economics" and starving the beast?

 

[P@triot]

We have spent more on our military and yet

No we haven’t. Why do you insist on lying?

 

[P@triot]

No...instead they nominate corrupt, self-admitted communists like Van Jones and John Brennan.

Don’t play this game with me Billy. You’re going to lose. Badly.

Boy, you fuckers really like to make shit up. I, on the other hand, didn't.

I didn’t make anything up. You know it too. You’re just upset (as always) that you just got owned with facts (as always).

 

[P@triot]

Unimaginable and inexcusable ineptitude by our federal government.

An audit conducted by Ernst & Young found that the agency’s accounting procedures are so flawed that there is no reliable way to track how it uses its $40 billion annual budget.

If a private organization was this inept, the left would take to the streets with violence. They would demand all kinds of “regulatory” reforms and legislation. And yet when it happens with tax payer dollars, all they do is shrug and insist that we need more government.

Major Pentagon agency can’t account for $800 million — but still may get a budget increase

lol. why blame the left; what happened to "tax cut economics" and starving the beast?

Because you’re the dumb asses who keep voting to give these people more power and more money. These irresponsible buffoons who can’t even account for $40 billion.

 

[danielpalos]

Unimaginable and inexcusable ineptitude by our federal government.

An audit conducted by Ernst & Young found that the agency’s accounting procedures are so flawed that there is no reliable way to track how it uses its $40 billion annual budget.

If a private organization was this inept, the left would take to the streets with violence. They would demand all kinds of “regulatory” reforms and legislation. And yet when it happens with tax payer dollars, all they do is shrug and insist that we need more government.

Major Pentagon agency can’t account for $800 million — but still may get a budget increase

lol. why blame the left; what happened to "tax cut economics" and starving the beast?

Because you’re the dumb asses who keep voting to give these people more power and more money. These irresponsible buffoons who can’t even account for $40 billion.

The right wing voted for those policies by electing, "your guy".

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Are you saying that feeding and housing and educating and training and helping our own people is NOT the 'right thing to do' ?

We have spent more on our military and yet, we still have wars
If military spending works......why are we still fighting?

There has never been a time in history where there was not war somewhere in this world. The difference between war and poverty is we really don't do anything to encourage or promote war.

Interesting point

There has never been a time in history when we didn’t have poverty

True, but massive poverty like we have?

How can you ever minimize or eliminate poverty when we encourage (through our social programs) poverty people making more poor people? Poverty can never be solved that way.

How do you solve poverty?
Tax cuts to billionaires?

For starters stop people who are on assistance from having children. Two is we should investigate every social program claim. Three is have a hotline where you can call the government and report people who are abusing the programs, like when I see that fat pig in line at the grocery store with four kids buying all kinds of dog food, cat food, cigarettes and alcohol. If they can afford those things, they can afford to feed themselves.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Sure it does. If being irresponsible and doing irresponsible things means you have to pay a price for it, then of course it does great good. It's called Tough Love.

When you reward people for failure, they don't care if they fail or not. No effort to avoid it.

And this is what our social programs do. Why? Because with Democrats, it's all about politics. It's not about helping the populous in general, it's about getting votes and power. So they do the wrong things for people.

Blame the victim

Good thing we just gave tax cuts to billionaires

Yes, good thing they did because several companies gave raises to their working people; some bonuses, some both.

It lowered our unemployment rate to a 50 year low, and more and more are getting off of the dole to work instead of sitting home and collecting money.

Now if you know of any jobs created by poor people, please let me know what they are. Until that time, those evil billionaires and millionaires are the people who create jobs so the rest of us have a way to make a living.

Yes “several”...four percent
The overwhelming number of companies just kept the money

So what? Would you rather have nobody getting raises or bonuses?

I would prefer if business shared their profit with those who created it

Then those people should only accept jobs with profit sharing as a benefit.

They didn't create the profit anyway, the company created the profit. All they did was the work they got paid for. They didn't invest one dime into the company, they don't pay the taxes on the building and property, they didn't market the product they made, they don't do payroll or make out checks, they don't have to pay to have the parking lot repaved or a new roof put on a building. They don't pay for the pens, paper, copiers, toilet paper, or telephone service. They are simply workers.

 

[danielpalos]

We have spent more on our military and yet, we still have wars
If military spending works......why are we still fighting?

There has never been a time in history where there was not war somewhere in this world. The difference between war and poverty is we really don't do anything to encourage or promote war.

Interesting point

There has never been a time in history when we didn’t have poverty

True, but massive poverty like we have?

How can you ever minimize or eliminate poverty when we encourage (through our social programs) poverty people making more poor people? Poverty can never be solved that way.

How do you solve poverty?
Tax cuts to billionaires?

For starters stop people who are on assistance from having children.

Provide the option of unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed.

 

[P@triot]

[The right wing voted for those policies by electing, "your guy".

My guy wasn’t elected....

 

[P@triot]

Provide the option of unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed.

That already exists, nitwit. It’s called “personal savings”.

 

[P@triot]

Provide the option of unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed.

That phrase right there sums up the simple-minded progressive. Priceless. Absolutely priceless.