Another active shooter

The Moon Bats were all giddy with joy when they found out the shooter was White.

However, now that we know he is a piece of shit TDS afflicted Muslim the Moon Bats all be like "what shooting?".

They've already shifted the narrative from "white racism" to "gun control."

Never mind the fact that it was an ISIS-inspired radical Islamic attack, it's all about "gun control" now.

It's sick puppy with a gun. There is no politics involved. He's going for a fast trip to a mental hospital for the rest of his life. I, for one, would prefer death before spending the rest of my life in a maximum security hospital.

So, are you planning on being the shithead's defense lawyer already? Because it sure sounds to me like you're making up excuses for him.
 
1616531935697.png
 
Jeeeeez you preople, allow the Nazis some slack. It was wartime as opposed to *peace time in American where Americans are blowing each others brains out in the thousands!

* as close to peacetime as Ameica gets.
 
So how many of those weapons German civilians owned were military-style weapons, semi-automatic or full-auto? Virtually none of them until the end of the war, when Germany was arming the civilian population. Most all of them were firearms intended for hunting or in some cases, small pistols for self-defense.

And of course certain segments of society, namely the Jews or political oppositionists, were prohibited from possessing any weapons. That was already set into motion by the Weimar Republic, that had already instituted across the board firearms registration.

If you really want to know about Hitler's gun-control, you won't read about it in some glib anti-gun piece like the one you posted. Read this one instead...
It chilling to read that article about Hitler and gun confiscation and 'control.' It reads like what the Democrat party is trying to do.
 
ROTFLMAO!
Shooter has a Middle Eastern name...you don't even know if he's Islamic or not---and it's like Christmas in spring..too funny!

You could be right. Maybe he was just a left-winger and a Trump-hater...

IMG_20210323_104122.jpg


IMG_20210323_104131.jpg
Him and 87m other people!

If you're one of those "87 million" others, should be be concerned about you as well?
Nah...I'm not a mass shooter kind of guy....more of a specific sort of shooter~
You should be concerned about the kids you picked on in school..if you were a bully...or concerned about someone who was bullied snapping. You might be concerned about wannabe revolutionaries--or basement dwelling incels. You are smart enough to read the common profile of the mass shooter--you make the call.

So you're offering a mass murderer and a terrorist an alibi by assigning him the status of "victim", because someone was once mean to him?

GTFO.
Comprehension not your strong point?

Those are common characteristics of many mass shooters..that's called data son. I offered no alibi/ i give not a shit about any of that once a trigger gets pulled. But knowing data..and interpreting it correctly..can lead to less triggers being pulled.
You would know this if you were as smart as you represent yourself to be~

There is no "common characteristic" that can identify someone who will eventually commit a murder. That's just eugenicist BS, like "All Jews have big noses" or "Black people like watermelons."

Apparently you've watched too many episodes of CSI or something.
 
So how many of those weapons German civilians owned were military-style weapons, semi-automatic or full-auto? Virtually none of them until the end of the war, when Germany was arming the civilian population. Most all of them were firearms intended for hunting or in some cases, small pistols for self-defense.

And of course certain segments of society, namely the Jews or political oppositionists, were prohibited from possessing any weapons. That was already set into motion by the Weimar Republic, that had already instituted across the board firearms registration.

If you really want to know about Hitler's gun-control, you won't read about it in some glib anti-gun piece like the one you posted. Read this one instead...
It chilling to read that article about Hitler and gun confiscation and 'control.' It reads like what the Democrat party is trying to do.

Registration first, then confiscation when it becomes "necessary." The Democrats are reading Hitler's diary.
 
The problem that we have is that you can never trust Liberals do do anything reasonable so you can't compromise with the shitheads.

Because of your brain already being too full, we've been able to reach agreement that 2nd. amendment rights must be qualified and curtailed for some Americans!

That's a huge step forward even though we haven't yet reached an agreement on 'who' should lose their 2nd. amendment rights.

Let's discuss it later when your brain isn't so full.


Liberals are always confused about this so let me 'spain this to you. Pay attention. It is important.

The Liberal filth's agenda is not to make America safer. If that was their agenda then they would be going after these Democrat controlled big city shitholes with large minority demographics that commit the great number of gun crimes in this country.

The Liberal agenda is to take away the Constitutional right to keep and bear arms because it is an impediment to making this country a Socialist shithole. They don't want White Conservatives to have the right to keep and bear arms.

That is why they first want to ban the most effective firearms and to make it so you have to have government permission to enjoy the Constitional right to keep and bear arms, which is exactly what background checks are all about.

Liberals are not honest with their agenda so you can't trust the sonofabitches, can you?

All of the despicable gun control, shit they are talking about won't do a damn thing to stop gun crime in this country but it will prevent law abiding Americans from enjoying the rights that are guaranteed in the Constitution. Law abiding Americans that the Left considers to be a threat to making America a Socialist shithole.

Of course we all know that Liberals don't know any more about the Constitution than they know about Economics, history, Climate Science, Biology or Ethics, don't we?
 
Because of your brain already being too full, we've been able to reach agreement that 2nd. amendment rights must be qualified and curtailed for some Americans!

That's a huge step forward even though we haven't yet reached an agreement on 'who' should lose their 2nd. amendment rights.

Let's discuss it later when your brain isn't so full.
I think all those of the liberal-leftist political view are dangerous and should be disarmed.
 
Good one! And it applies to children as much as it appies to cakes. Americans need to just keep their whole cake, the same as parents should just keep their whole child.

A half a child isn't any better than a half a cake.

Although the libruls would never admit that 3/4's of a child is better than none, depending on which quarter got shot off.
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

The myth of the good guy with a gun is just that: a myth.

Do you ever get tired of being proven to be an ignorant imbecile?




Your opinion based cite is based on
(Cook and Ludwig, 1996 which is based on:


Kleck 1992 which has been debunked.

The Contradictions of the Kleck Study
HEMENWAY CRITICISM OF KLECK
STUDIES SHOWING RISK OF GUNS OUTWEIGH BENEFITS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE STUDIES CONCERNING DEFENSIVE GUN USES

As for the notion that those using firearms to fend off attackers were more effective in avoiding injury than those using other weapons or no weapons, the DOJ study makes the following exclaimer: "Care should be used in interpreting these data because many aspects of crimes--including victim and offender characteristics, crime circumstances, and offender intent--contribute to victims' injury outcomes."

What is also interesting is that the study notes that "In most cases victims who used firearms to defend themselves or their property were confronted by offenders who were either unarmed or armed with weapons other than firearms." Specifically, only 35% of those who used a firearm in self-defense actually faced an offender who had a gun. DOJ makes no judgments in this study on whether the level of force employed by these individuals was appropriate or consonant with the threat they faced. It may very well be that the presence of firearms in many of these incidents escalated what otherwise might have been non-violent (or non-fatal) encounters.

According to the DOJ study, gun owners also provided criminals with ample opportunities to arm themselves through firearm theft: "From 1987-1992 victims reported an annual average of about 341,000 incidents of firearm theft. Because the NCVS asks for types but not a count of items stolen, the annual total of firearms stolen probably exceeds the number of incidents." It should also be noted that there is no federal law requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms, and almost no state laws in this regard. There are undoubtedly thousands of stolen firearms that go entirely unreported every year.

The problem with Kleck's figures was he used ALL uses of firearms including LE and Military and used them in his Civilian figures. If his figures had been correct, if I were to walk to my favorite quick stop, I would have to shoot my way all the way there, shoot my way while in the store and then shoot my way all the way back home.
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

The myth of the good guy with a gun is just that: a myth.

Do you ever get tired of being proven to be an ignorant imbecile?




Your opinion based cite is based on
(Cook and Ludwig, 1996 which is based on:


Kleck 1992 which has been debunked.

The Contradictions of the Kleck Study
HEMENWAY CRITICISM OF KLECK
STUDIES SHOWING RISK OF GUNS OUTWEIGH BENEFITS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE STUDIES CONCERNING DEFENSIVE GUN USES

As for the notion that those using firearms to fend off attackers were more effective in avoiding injury than those using other weapons or no weapons, the DOJ study makes the following exclaimer: "Care should be used in interpreting these data because many aspects of crimes--including victim and offender characteristics, crime circumstances, and offender intent--contribute to victims' injury outcomes."

What is also interesting is that the study notes that "In most cases victims who used firearms to defend themselves or their property were confronted by offenders who were either unarmed or armed with weapons other than firearms." Specifically, only 35% of those who used a firearm in self-defense actually faced an offender who had a gun. DOJ makes no judgments in this study on whether the level of force employed by these individuals was appropriate or consonant with the threat they faced. It may very well be that the presence of firearms in many of these incidents escalated what otherwise might have been non-violent (or non-fatal) encounters.

According to the DOJ study, gun owners also provided criminals with ample opportunities to arm themselves through firearm theft: "From 1987-1992 victims reported an annual average of about 341,000 incidents of firearm theft. Because the NCVS asks for types but not a count of items stolen, the annual total of firearms stolen probably exceeds the number of incidents." It should also be noted that there is no federal law requiring the reporting of lost and stolen firearms, and almost no state laws in this regard. There are undoubtedly thousands of stolen firearms that go entirely unreported every year.

The problem with Kleck's figures was he used ALL uses of firearms including LE and Military and used them in his Civilian figures. If his figures had been correct, if I were to walk to my favorite quick stop, I would have to shoot my way all the way there, shoot my way while in the store and then shoot my way all the way back home.

The DOJ does not want an armed population.
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

Liberals should never be allowed to own a gun. 80% solved.

So you're against the 2nd amendment..I thought so....hypocrite

What????.....Most libs do not have the maturity to handle something like a gun

They have no maturity for raising kids, money, giving advice. Liberals are just miserable people.

You see, that's a stupid mindset..to set a political bar to gun ownership makes you into what you claim to despise.
But whatever..troll on...

LOLOL. You see what we're doing to you on this thread bro.............We got you bouncing like The Pinball Wizard...lol
 

This is something that seemed to die down during Trump...no pun intended...but why as soon as we get another democrat president we begin to see mass shooters again?...it happened under Clinton Obama and the anti 2nd amendment RINO Bush...makes me wonder if all of those stories about CIA mind control are true....
Lets face it...dems want to take guns away and need us to want that too...what better way than to create more random shootings....
I was thinking that as those poor forced sex slave workers in Atlanta were murdered. Now this.

Anyone know the Chinese or Venezuelan anthem so I could start practicing? Then I'll know both when we chose.
Yeah..cause everything is political, right?

F'kin idiot ghouls.

Ghouls are what right-wingers have turned into with pathetic OPs like this.

So why are you on the thread.

You need to feel good on your soapbox.

You are pretty sad yourself.
He thinks because he has that avatar it makes him look smart. But it soon s shows it doesn't.
 
I think all those of the liberal-leftist political view are dangerous and should be disarmed.

What's the leftist political view? In my opinion it is chiefly in advocating a piece of the American pie. Or that could be termed as wanting other people's money for free.

But the fact of the matter is that the Capitol rioters of a few thousand were representing the interests of nearly half of the American people.

Whether the rioters were leftists or rightists, is of little importance even though it hotly debated. I would call it a coming together of the American working class, both leftists and rightists, to demand that piece of the pie.

It's unity that hadn't been shown by America's working class for many years!

And most important, it can be seen as a great danger to America's very wealthy ruling class.

We could say that it's a good job that Trump didn't win the battle had he won then he would have really stuck it to the corporate ruling class!

Now had Trump won and if he was a corporate psychopath, think of how America would have been changed!
 

This is something that seemed to die down during Trump...no pun intended...but why as soon as we get another democrat president we begin to see mass shooters again?...it happened under Clinton Obama and the anti 2nd amendment RINO Bush...makes me wonder if all of those stories about CIA mind control are true....
Lets face it...dems want to take guns away and need us to want that too...what better way than to create more random shootings....
I was thinking that as those poor forced sex slave workers in Atlanta were murdered. Now this.

Anyone know the Chinese or Venezuelan anthem so I could start practicing? Then I'll know both when we chose.
Yeah..cause everything is political, right?

F'kin idiot ghouls.
Incredible. But not surprising.
So glad I watch shit holes from way way way afar. Elections have consequences especially in shit holes

Jezus what kind of life could you live in a shit hole or its burbs??? Colorado is a pot infested shit hole now.
Boulder, Colorado is a “shithole?” Are you really that stupid? Where do you live? Some trailer park in Bumfuck, Alabama?
I said California libturds turned Colorado shit blue Dooshalot. Buncha GD dirty fucking hippies and losers.

SEATTLE and PORTLAND were once beautiful turned libturd shithole with your destructive policies.Now go suck an egg penis breath.
 
I think all those of the liberal-leftist political view are dangerous and should be disarmed.

That would be huge progress Leo! Half of all Americans would be disarmed and that would reduce the slaughter by at least a half and more likely by 3/4's!

The remaing 1/4 by the police could just be sort of acknowledged with a wink and a nod!

It's long overdue Leo!
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

The myth of the good guy with a gun is just that: a myth.

Do you ever get tired of being proven to be an ignorant imbecile?




wow..Look what little fucktard was triggered.

Jus another typical comment from Nostro, the biggest dumbshit on this board.

You have to post from some libertarian blog.

LOL.. How about from a real news source, Nobrain.


Facts always piss of single digit IQ libtards like you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top