Another active shooter


Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

The myth of the good guy with a gun is just that: a myth.

Do you ever get tired of being proven to be an ignorant imbecile?




wow..Look what little fucktard was triggered.

Jus another typical comment from Nostro, the biggest dumbshit on this board.

You have to post from some libertarian blog.

LOL.. How about from a real news source, Nobrain.


Facts always piss of single digit IQ libtards like you.

Hey dumbfuck, did even read your own link. The author of the opinion piece you cite, says he got his facts “on-line“. Granted you are among the more dense posters in this board, so the idea that he cites “facts“ is only someone with your dim-witted would take seriously. Even the theauthor admired his sources are biased. You truly are an ass monkey,

You dismiss my link because he used the innerwebs........yet you used the innerwebs for your link. :cuckoo:

You are a dumbass who is too stupid to know when he is being a colossal dumbass.

I note you can’t refute any of the data I posted.
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

The myth of the good guy with a gun is just that: a myth.

Do you ever get tired of being proven to be an ignorant imbecile?




wow..Look what little fucktard was triggered.

Jus another typical comment from Nostro, the biggest dumbshit on this board.

You have to post from some libertarian blog.

LOL.. How about from a real news source, Nobrain.


Facts always piss of single digit IQ libtards like you.

Hey dumbfuck, did even read your own link. The author of the opinion piece you cite, says he got his facts “on-line“. Granted you are among the more dense posters in this board, so the idea that he cites “facts“ is only someone with your dim-witted would take seriously. Even the theauthor admired his sources are biased. You truly are an ass monkey,

You dismiss my link because he used the innerwebs........yet you used the innerwebs for your link. :cuckoo:

You are a dumbass who is too stupid to know when he is being a colossal dumbass.

I note you can’t refute any of the data I posted.

This coming from the guy who is too stupid to admit when he is wrong. John Lott, who your blogger widely quotes and praises, is a well known nut job hired by the Trump AdmInistration.

Lott is also a proven liar and fabricator.

Not that it matters to you because you are two peas in the same rancid pod.


“Beyond posing as a female graduate student to praise his own work and push back against critics for three years, Lott has a horrible record of accuracy. For example, in his 1998 book More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Lott pushed the myth that increasing gun ownership -- and especially increasing concealed weapons permits -- results in fewer incidents of violent crime. The book was widely criticized, and the Stanford Law Review said Lott made his central claim “without credible statistical support.” In fact, Lott’s premise has proved to be patently false; states with right-to-carry concealed handgun laws have higher rates of violent crime than states with no such laws.”

Try again, Dumb ass.

Kicking your ass, Nostro, has become very boring.
 
Last edited:
forget the corona pandemic, we have a GUNS pandemic, a white supremacist pandemic, and a Muslim extremist pandemic

Made you forget all about the "Mexican kids wrapped up like burritos in foil blankies on the floor in cages" pandemic, didn't it?

:auiqs.jpg:
 
Good update..some interesting stuff here:



Investigators have not established a motive, but authorities believe he was the only shooter, Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty said.
The suspect purchased the assault weapon just six days before the shooting, on March 16, according to the arrest affidavit released Tuesday. It was not immediately known where the gun was purchased.

The shooting came 10 days after a judge blocked a ban on assault rifles passed by the city of Boulder in 2018. That ordinance and another banning large-capacity magazines came after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people dead.
A lawsuit challenging the bans was filed quickly, backed by the National Rifle Association. The judge struck down the ordinance under a Colorado law that blocks cities from making their own rules about guns.
A law enforcement official briefed on the shooting said the suspect's family told investigators they believed Alissa was suffering some type of mental illness, including delusions. Relatives described times when Alissa told them people were following or chasing him, which they said may have contributed to the violence, the official said. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to AP on condition of anonymity.
One caller said the suspect opened fire out the window of his vehicle. Others called to say they were hiding inside the store as the gunman fired on customers. Witnesses described the shooter as having a black AR-15-style gun and wearing blue jeans and maybe body armor.
By the time he was in custody, Alissa had been struck by a bullet that passed through his leg, the affidavit said. He had removed most of his clothing and was dressed only in shorts. Inside the store, he had left the gun, a tactical vest, a semiautomatic handgun and his bloodied clothing, the affidavit said.

After the shooting, detectives went to Alissa's home and found his sister-in-law, who told them that he had been playing around with a weapon she thought looked like a "machine gun," about two days earlier, the document said.

The law was blocked due to the wording. The phrase "Assault Rifle" used which is a Military Term for a group of rifles and SMGs. In the Civilian World, it's a generic term that would encompass an entire class of rifles including many legitimate hunting rifles. And that has been found to be unconstitutional. But when it's spelled out "AR-15/AK47 and their copies" then it's perfectly legal. The AR and the clones can be banned by the State,County,Province and Cities. But it has to be very specific in language. I can only think of 2 areas that have been sued that included that wording; California and Boston and both have been upheld in the Federal District Courts. What I don't understand is, Oregon's wording for their ban reads "Assault Rifle" and no one has take that to court to get it bounced. Stop crying in your beer and get that handled.
 

Guy shooting....No law enforcement...Good argument for the 2nd amendment.

Only morons think the answer to mass shootings is more guns. It is like saying the answer to arson is more matches.


Only a real moron would just let himself get shot dead because he didn't have the tools or the balls to protect himself.

backfire
[ˈbakˌfī(ə)r]

NOUN
  1. A fire set intentionally to arrest the progress of an approaching fire by creating a burned area in its path, thus depriving the fire of fuel.

The myth of the good guy with a gun is just that: a myth.

Do you ever get tired of being proven to be an ignorant imbecile?




wow..Look what little fucktard was triggered.

Jus another typical comment from Nostro, the biggest dumbshit on this board.

You have to post from some libertarian blog.

LOL.. How about from a real news source, Nobrain.


Facts always piss of single digit IQ libtards like you.

Hey dumbfuck, did even read your own link. The author of the opinion piece you cite, says he got his facts “on-line“. Granted you are among the more dense posters in this board, so the idea that he cites “facts“ is only someone with your dim-witted would take seriously. Even the theauthor admired his sources are biased. You truly are an ass monkey,

You dismiss my link because he used the innerwebs........yet you used the innerwebs for your link. :cuckoo:

You are a dumbass who is too stupid to know when he is being a colossal dumbass.

I note you can’t refute any of the data I posted.

This coming from the guy who is too stupid to admit when he is wrong. John Lott, who your blogger widely quotes and praises, is a well known nut job hired by the Trump AdmInistration.

Lott is also a proven liar and fabricator.

Not that it matters to you because you are two peas in the same rancid pod.


“Beyond posing as a female graduate student to praise his own work and push back against critics for three years, Lott has a horrible record of accuracy. For example, in his 1998 book More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, Lott pushed the myth that increasing gun ownership -- and especially increasing concealed weapons permits -- results in fewer incidents of violent crime. The book was widely criticized, and the Stanford Law Review said Lott made his central claim “without credible statistical support.” In fact, Lott’s premise has proved to be patently false; states with right-to-carry concealed handgun laws have higher rates of violent crime than states with no such laws.”

Try again, Dumb ass.

Kicking your ass, Nostro, has become very boring.


John Lott was the coauthor of the report that Kleck did in 1992.
 
I have the solution. Muslims should not be allowed to have guns. Now there will never be another mass shooting.

Am I doing that right libs?
 
Good update..some interesting stuff here:



Investigators have not established a motive, but authorities believe he was the only shooter, Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty said.
The suspect purchased the assault weapon just six days before the shooting, on March 16, according to the arrest affidavit released Tuesday. It was not immediately known where the gun was purchased.

The shooting came 10 days after a judge blocked a ban on assault rifles passed by the city of Boulder in 2018. That ordinance and another banning large-capacity magazines came after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people dead.
A lawsuit challenging the bans was filed quickly, backed by the National Rifle Association. The judge struck down the ordinance under a Colorado law that blocks cities from making their own rules about guns.
A law enforcement official briefed on the shooting said the suspect's family told investigators they believed Alissa was suffering some type of mental illness, including delusions. Relatives described times when Alissa told them people were following or chasing him, which they said may have contributed to the violence, the official said. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to AP on condition of anonymity.
One caller said the suspect opened fire out the window of his vehicle. Others called to say they were hiding inside the store as the gunman fired on customers. Witnesses described the shooter as having a black AR-15-style gun and wearing blue jeans and maybe body armor.
By the time he was in custody, Alissa had been struck by a bullet that passed through his leg, the affidavit said. He had removed most of his clothing and was dressed only in shorts. Inside the store, he had left the gun, a tactical vest, a semiautomatic handgun and his bloodied clothing, the affidavit said.

After the shooting, detectives went to Alissa's home and found his sister-in-law, who told them that he had been playing around with a weapon she thought looked like a "machine gun," about two days earlier, the document said.

The law was blocked due to the wording. The phrase "Assault Rifle" used which is a Military Term for a group of rifles and SMGs. In the Civilian World, it's a generic term that would encompass an entire class of rifles including many legitimate hunting rifles. And that has been found to be unconstitutional. But when it's spelled out "AR-15/AK47 and their copies" then it's perfectly legal. The AR and the clones can be banned by the State,County,Province and Cities. But it has to be very specific in language. I can only think of 2 areas that have been sued that included that wording; California and Boston and both have been upheld in the Federal District Courts. What I don't understand is, Oregon's wording for their ban reads "Assault Rifle" and no one has take that to court to get it bounced. Stop crying in your beer and get that handled.

It wasn't an "assault rifle" the Muslim shooter used. It wasn't even a "rifle", it was a pistol.

Ruger® AR-556® Pistol Centerfire Pistol Model 8570

1.jpg
 
Good update..some interesting stuff here:



Investigators have not established a motive, but authorities believe he was the only shooter, Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty said.
The suspect purchased the assault weapon just six days before the shooting, on March 16, according to the arrest affidavit released Tuesday. It was not immediately known where the gun was purchased.

The shooting came 10 days after a judge blocked a ban on assault rifles passed by the city of Boulder in 2018. That ordinance and another banning large-capacity magazines came after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people dead.
A lawsuit challenging the bans was filed quickly, backed by the National Rifle Association. The judge struck down the ordinance under a Colorado law that blocks cities from making their own rules about guns.
A law enforcement official briefed on the shooting said the suspect's family told investigators they believed Alissa was suffering some type of mental illness, including delusions. Relatives described times when Alissa told them people were following or chasing him, which they said may have contributed to the violence, the official said. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to AP on condition of anonymity.
One caller said the suspect opened fire out the window of his vehicle. Others called to say they were hiding inside the store as the gunman fired on customers. Witnesses described the shooter as having a black AR-15-style gun and wearing blue jeans and maybe body armor.
By the time he was in custody, Alissa had been struck by a bullet that passed through his leg, the affidavit said. He had removed most of his clothing and was dressed only in shorts. Inside the store, he had left the gun, a tactical vest, a semiautomatic handgun and his bloodied clothing, the affidavit said.

After the shooting, detectives went to Alissa's home and found his sister-in-law, who told them that he had been playing around with a weapon she thought looked like a "machine gun," about two days earlier, the document said.

The law was blocked due to the wording. The phrase "Assault Rifle" used which is a Military Term for a group of rifles and SMGs. In the Civilian World, it's a generic term that would encompass an entire class of rifles including many legitimate hunting rifles. And that has been found to be unconstitutional. But when it's spelled out "AR-15/AK47 and their copies" then it's perfectly legal. The AR and the clones can be banned by the State,County,Province and Cities. But it has to be very specific in language. I can only think of 2 areas that have been sued that included that wording; California and Boston and both have been upheld in the Federal District Courts. What I don't understand is, Oregon's wording for their ban reads "Assault Rifle" and no one has take that to court to get it bounced. Stop crying in your beer and get that handled.

It wasn't an "assault rifle" the Muslim shooter used. It wasn't even a "rifle", it was a pistol.

Ruger® AR-556® Pistol Centerfire Pistol Model 8570

1.jpg

But that looks scary. BANNED!
 
There are more guns in shit holes than anywhere.

If we remove guns from shit holes only, that would solve 80% of the problem.

Liberals with guns are the problem.

Exactly the opposite, of course
You know why there are more mass shootings? Liberal ideas have forced adults to give kids timeouts and spare the rod. Kids that fight in school get arrested these days and there is no outlet for pent up aggression. Everyone has "mental health issues" instead of getting their asses kicked once in a while. Add to it the lack of deterrent by our softie criminal justice system. If people like this shooter got a swift and public execution, these kinds crimes would subside. Look at the numbers of death sentences in this country since 1977 and look again at the graph posted about the numbers of mass shootings. Liberals need to learn to reap what they sow.



View attachment 471155

Really?

February 28 2017


President Donald Trump quietly signed a bill into law Tuesday rolling back an Obama-era regulation that made it harder for people with mental illnesses to purchase a gun.

The rule, which was finalized in December, added people receiving Social Security checks for mental illnesses and people deemed unfit to handle their own financial affairs to the national background check database.

President Barack Obama recommended the now-nullified regulation in a 2013 memo following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, which left 20 first graders and six others dead. The measure sought to block some people with severe mental health problems from buying guns.
www.nbcnews.com › news › us-news

RW's had to repeal the law, otherwise none of them would be able to buy a gun.

Can you prove that people who have been judged to be unfit to handle their financial affairs are actually a danger to themselves or others? Because that's what Trump rolled back.
 
Six dead, including one police officer.

I notice your liberal news outlets were careful not to report the races of victims and attacker

did you know this was a black on white crime?
What do you know about the victims? I've heard basically nothing, although early on they showed pics of the shooter, who was white.
Or was that a joke?

He's Arabic.
 
whatever you do, just remember one thing: these Muslim extremists are up to no good, to put it bluntly...stay vigilant, folks!
 
Another thread filled with RWI talking points.
Fake alpha males that are fake Christians.
Blah blah blah.
 
Yea, I’m pretty sure people aren’t arguing that guns kill people all by themselves.

Note how they call it "gun control" and not "people control"

There's a reason for that.


Suit yourself though. See ya.

See ya.

“Gun control” doesn’t imply that people think guns kill people all on their own.

Sorry, but this isn’t complicated. At all.

No, it isn't, really. Instead of controlling the sale of firearms, control who gets them. If you are mentally unstable, on the terrorism watchlist, a convicted felon or etc, you should not be allowed to purchase or a firearm. Make the punishment for violating that be as harsh as the law will allow. As a means of deterrence.

Just as an aside:

If what you say is true, why are we controlling guns instead of the people who use them? Why can't we focus on the behavior of the person instead of the availability of the object?
 
Last edited:
Good update..some interesting stuff here:



Investigators have not established a motive, but authorities believe he was the only shooter, Boulder County District Attorney Michael Dougherty said.
The suspect purchased the assault weapon just six days before the shooting, on March 16, according to the arrest affidavit released Tuesday. It was not immediately known where the gun was purchased.

The shooting came 10 days after a judge blocked a ban on assault rifles passed by the city of Boulder in 2018. That ordinance and another banning large-capacity magazines came after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, that left 17 people dead.
A lawsuit challenging the bans was filed quickly, backed by the National Rifle Association. The judge struck down the ordinance under a Colorado law that blocks cities from making their own rules about guns.
A law enforcement official briefed on the shooting said the suspect's family told investigators they believed Alissa was suffering some type of mental illness, including delusions. Relatives described times when Alissa told them people were following or chasing him, which they said may have contributed to the violence, the official said. The official was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke to AP on condition of anonymity.
One caller said the suspect opened fire out the window of his vehicle. Others called to say they were hiding inside the store as the gunman fired on customers. Witnesses described the shooter as having a black AR-15-style gun and wearing blue jeans and maybe body armor.
By the time he was in custody, Alissa had been struck by a bullet that passed through his leg, the affidavit said. He had removed most of his clothing and was dressed only in shorts. Inside the store, he had left the gun, a tactical vest, a semiautomatic handgun and his bloodied clothing, the affidavit said.

After the shooting, detectives went to Alissa's home and found his sister-in-law, who told them that he had been playing around with a weapon she thought looked like a "machine gun," about two days earlier, the document said.

The law was blocked due to the wording. The phrase "Assault Rifle" used which is a Military Term for a group of rifles and SMGs. In the Civilian World, it's a generic term that would encompass an entire class of rifles including many legitimate hunting rifles. And that has been found to be unconstitutional. But when it's spelled out "AR-15/AK47 and their copies" then it's perfectly legal. The AR and the clones can be banned by the State,County,Province and Cities. But it has to be very specific in language. I can only think of 2 areas that have been sued that included that wording; California and Boston and both have been upheld in the Federal District Courts. What I don't understand is, Oregon's wording for their ban reads "Assault Rifle" and no one has take that to court to get it bounced. Stop crying in your beer and get that handled.

It wasn't an "assault rifle" the Muslim shooter used. It wasn't even a "rifle", it was a pistol.

Ruger® AR-556® Pistol Centerfire Pistol Model 8570

1.jpg
But why does it look like a rifle?
 

This is something that seemed to die down during Trump...no pun intended...but why as soon as we get another democrat president we begin to see mass shooters again?...it happened under Clinton Obama and the anti 2nd amendment RINO Bush...makes me wonder if all of those stories about CIA mind control are true....
Lets face it...dems want to take guns away and need us to want that too...what better way than to create more random shootings....
No, there were under his watch each year than most.
Typical loony rightie - this is your OP when a guy guns down six people? That's what you take out of what has happened?
Yep...don't you find it strange?....
No, because two of the biggest years in mass shootings were under Trump. So your op-ed is shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top