Another example of lib hypocrisy. Lena Dunham vs. the Duggars

the cash cow must be protected at all costs..thats right stephanie they thought it was taken care of and no one would ever find out......

when one person knows something its a secret...when two people know it...its an accident waiting to happen
 
the cash cow must be protected at all costs..thats right stephanie they thought it was taken care of and no one would ever find out......

when one person knows something its a secret...when two people know it...its an accident waiting to happen

wow, is that something you really sit around fretting over? I mean seriously. how is that affecting YOUR pathetic lives. just so petty but nothing new for you on the left.
try and get rest now. You have all day tomorrow to worry over the Duggers
 
the have the Hillary Clinton: who is a corrupted cash cow that is being investigated RIGHT NOW for taking MONIES from FOREIGNERS and doling out FAVORS for it while she was SOS.

but all they can fret over is some people called the Duggers

now tell me that isn't shallow?

I guess it keeps peoples minds off all the crooks, molesters, adulterers, rapist, members of the KKK they have ELECTED to government that we ALL have had to suffer because of them
 
the have the Hillary Clinton: who is a corrupted cash cow that is being investigated RIGHT NOW for taking MONIES from FOREIGNERS and doling out FAVORS for it while she was SOS.

but all they can fret over is some people called the Duggers

now tell me that isn't shallow?

I guess it keeps peoples minds off all the crooks, molesters, adulterers, rapist, members of the KKK they have ELECTED to government that we ALL have to suffer because of them

You don't realize it but you hit the nail on the head, it's deflection. Something the left's masters use on them all the time
 
the have the Hillary Clinton: who is a corrupted cash cow that is being investigated RIGHT NOW for taking MONIES from FOREIGNERS and doling out FAVORS for it while she was SOS.

but all they can fret over is some people called the Duggers

now tell me that isn't shallow?

I guess it keeps peoples minds off all the crooks, molesters, adulterers, rapist, members of the KKK they have ELECTED to government that we ALL have to suffer because of them

You don't realize it but you hit the nail on the head, it's deflection. Something the left's masters use on them all the time

Yep, I've been on here long enough and have seen them in action. through Bush AND now that ugly man, Obama..... they ARE the drama queens of the FAUX outrage...even when it's their own fellow countrymen and women..... it's truly PATHETIC
 
Yeah. And your party elected several rapists and child molesters. Save the moral blather for someone who believes your crap.
As if your party hasn't.....lolololol

I don't have a party. And I'm also not the one trying to tie Josh Duggar's actions around certain Republican candidates necks... While begging people to vote for someone who's husband was a serial rapist.

they just can't hate on someone enough. even a everyday CITIZEN... you can feel their hate for us through our computers. it's the sickest thing I've ever seen. not an admirable trait either. some are just damn scary you read their crap

Trust me... I know very well what kind of people I am dealing with.

Creepy and unstable. :)
Wow, people that judge pedos are creepy and unstable in your mind.

No... Just serial liars... Like you for instance.
 
okay child molester....and i didnt call him a pedophile...its a link

He was a child himself
Latest studies say that approximately 32% of male-female siblings have sexual contact (touching, seeing, exploring) prior to age 15.

I know, "playing doctor". With that said I think there is probably more to it than just that and I think what happened was horrible but this witch hunt is getting tiresome. The records should have never been released.

Agreed
 
this is how low the LEFT/Democrats will crawl. First the Duggers NOW THIS. Anyone ever hear how many TRAFFIC tickets any of the Democrats have had?

snip:
New York Times: ‘Rubio Got 17 Traffic Tickets!’ Truth: ‘Minus 13. Over 20 Years.’
The paper of record.
by Henry Gomez
June 5, 2015 - 12:07 pm



Delivering work that will surely contend for a Pulitzer Prize, Alan Rappeport and Steve Eder have posted a piece at the New York Times’ political blog First Draft about Senator Marco Rubio’s driving record.

By poring over public records, the authors, with the help of researcher Kitty Bennett, found that Rubio was cited for traffic infractions four times in a span of almost twenty years. (It now seems that these intrepid newspersons had some help in the form of the Democrat-aligned oppo firm, American Bridge. Maybe they deserve that Pulitzer.)


I wonder what other dirt these truth-seekers will find. http://www.nytimes.com/politics/fir...ited-17-times-for-traffic-infractions-2/?_r=0

The kicker: the headline wasn’t about Rubio’s four tickets. Instead, it read:

Marco Rubio and His Wife Cited 17 Times for Traffic Infractions.

You see, there’s really no bias in the media at all. Fast & Furious, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, the misinformation by the State Department about the deadly attack in Benghazi — all made-up scandals from the political right.

But this, this is really important: Republican presidential candidate’s wife has a lead foot while shuttling four kids around the traffic hellhole that is Miami.

ALL OF IT HERE: AND SHUN that DNC Lapdog rag, the Nyslimes
New York Times Rubio Got 17 Traffic Tickets Truth Minus 13. Over 20 Years. PJ Media
 
the have the Hillary Clinton: who is a corrupted cash cow that is being investigated RIGHT NOW for taking MONIES from FOREIGNERS and doling out FAVORS for it while she was SOS.

but all they can fret over is some people called the Duggers

now tell me that isn't shallow?

I guess it keeps peoples minds off all the crooks, molesters, adulterers, rapist, members of the KKK they have ELECTED to government that we ALL have had to suffer because of them

You know WHY you're a pathetic right wing idiot, Steph.......????

This thread was started by one of YOUR ilk.....yes another tea sipping moron.

I couldn't care less for the red-necked Duggars and their holier than thou attitudes while molesting their own kin.
 
this is how low the LEFT/Democrats will crawl. First the Duggers NOW THIS. Anyone ever hear how many TRAFFIC tickets any of the Democrats have had?

snip:
New York Times: ‘Rubio Got 17 Traffic Tickets!’ Truth: ‘Minus 13. Over 20 Years.’
The paper of record.
by Henry Gomez
June 5, 2015 - 12:07 pm



Delivering work that will surely contend for a Pulitzer Prize, Alan Rappeport and Steve Eder have posted a piece at the New York Times’ political blog First Draft about Senator Marco Rubio’s driving record.

By poring over public records, the authors, with the help of researcher Kitty Bennett, found that Rubio was cited for traffic infractions four times in a span of almost twenty years. (It now seems that these intrepid newspersons had some help in the form of the Democrat-aligned oppo firm, American Bridge. Maybe they deserve that Pulitzer.)


I wonder what other dirt these truth-seekers will find.

The kicker: the headline wasn’t about Rubio’s four tickets. Instead, it read:

Marco Rubio and His Wife Cited 17 Times for Traffic Infractions.

You see, there’s really no bias in the media at all. Fast & Furious, the IRS targeting of conservative groups, the misinformation by the State Department about the deadly attack in Benghazi — all made-up scandals from the political right.

But this, this is really important: Republican presidential candidate’s wife has a lead foot while shuttling four kids around the traffic hellhole that is Miami.

ALL OF IT HERE: AND SHUN that DNC Lapdog rag, the Nyslimes
New York Times Rubio Got 17 Traffic Tickets Truth Minus 13. Over 20 Years. PJ Media


FUNNY......especially since your sister in stupidity, Irish, just posted:

You don't realize it but you hit the nail on the head, it's deflection. Something the left's masters use on them all the time.

Is YOUR post, Steph.......a "deflection"??????
 
the have the Hillary Clinton: who is a corrupted cash cow that is being investigated RIGHT NOW for taking MONIES from FOREIGNERS and doling out FAVORS for it while she was SOS.

but all they can fret over is some people called the Duggers

now tell me that isn't shallow?

I guess it keeps peoples minds off all the crooks, molesters, adulterers, rapist, members of the KKK they have ELECTED to government that we ALL have to suffer because of them

You don't realize it but you hit the nail on the head, it's deflection. Something the left's masters use on them all the time


Yes, sure its the left-wingers who deal in deflections....
WHO started this thread, Steph???? LOL,


WHEW! See what made Megyn Kelly YELL in defense of the Duggars


RIGHT WING HYPOCRITES !!!!!!!!
 
Grow up you pathetic little fraud. You keep forgetting I KNOW you are a fraud. Google was my friend :) Now shush half pint

Why don't you go join Steph and go burn a few crosses on somebody's lawn.......Don't forget to put on those cute hoods,
 
I don't watch cable. Have never heard of the Duggars before this controversy.

But I do know hypocrisy, when I see it.

Remember Lena Dunham's revelation she molested her sister????????

Lena Dunham Describes Sexually Abusing Her Little Sister Truth Revolt

But anyone that called foul on this was a "right wing nut." They were intolerant, and bigoted and blah blah blah.

Lena Dunham defends herself against accusations of sexual abuse - LA Times

Jimmy Kimmel Defends Lena Dunham Mediaite

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dg...ce-between-josh-duggar-and-lena-dunham-again/

But, the left sure have jumped on this Duggar thing. Why, I have no idea and really don't care. If the guy is guilty. Lock him up and throw away the key.

But the double standard is obvious, and I know the left will go crazy, because I dare point it out.

any other lies you'd like to tell, psycho?

Where is the lie? Libtards are idiots, hypocrits, partisan hacks and stupid failures at life, by and large.

He nailed it in my opinion.

poor wingnuts, dunham didn't molest anyone... though i know that's the new freak way of trying to defend the pedophile

Yeah, keep telling yourself that lie, honey.
 
I don't watch cable. Have never heard of the Duggars before this controversy.

But I do know hypocrisy, when I see it.

Remember Lena Dunham's revelation she molested her sister????????

Lena Dunham Describes Sexually Abusing Her Little Sister Truth Revolt

But anyone that called foul on this was a "right wing nut." They were intolerant, and bigoted and blah blah blah.

Lena Dunham defends herself against accusations of sexual abuse - LA Times

Jimmy Kimmel Defends Lena Dunham Mediaite

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dg...ce-between-josh-duggar-and-lena-dunham-again/

But, the left sure have jumped on this Duggar thing. Why, I have no idea and really don't care. If the guy is guilty. Lock him up and throw away the key.

But the double standard is obvious, and I know the left will go crazy, because I dare point it out.






The problem is Dunham is a liar, so what do you believe when she says something? She says things to garner publicity and freak people out. The Duggars though seem to have been protecting a pedophile in their midst, and THAT is reprehensible.

Prove he is still a pedophile, liar.





I don't have to. The criminal justice system is going to have far more information than I ever will. I was merely addressing the difference between the two. No need to get your panties in a bunch, it was an observation and nothing else.

Yeah, you will just repeat slander by way of example.

Moral values have really disappeared in this country. There is no evidence Josh has done anything of the same sort since he was a child. But people buy into these lies and treat them as though they have some merit and thus spread the lies even further.

Yeah, that bugs me and should bug any decent minded person.
 
I don't watch cable. Have never heard of the Duggars before this controversy.

But I do know hypocrisy, when I see it.

Remember Lena Dunham's revelation she molested her sister????????

Lena Dunham Describes Sexually Abusing Her Little Sister Truth Revolt

But anyone that called foul on this was a "right wing nut." They were intolerant, and bigoted and blah blah blah.

Lena Dunham defends herself against accusations of sexual abuse - LA Times

Jimmy Kimmel Defends Lena Dunham Mediaite

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dg...ce-between-josh-duggar-and-lena-dunham-again/

But, the left sure have jumped on this Duggar thing. Why, I have no idea and really don't care. If the guy is guilty. Lock him up and throw away the key.

But the double standard is obvious, and I know the left will go crazy, because I dare point it out.






The problem is Dunham is a liar, so what do you believe when she says something? She says things to garner publicity and freak people out. The Duggars though seem to have been protecting a pedophile in their midst, and THAT is reprehensible.

Prove he is still a pedophile, liar.





I don't have to. The criminal justice system is going to have far more information than I ever will. I was merely addressing the difference between the two. No need to get your panties in a bunch, it was an observation and nothing else.

Yeah, you will just repeat slander by way of example.

Moral values have really disappeared in this country. There is no evidence Josh has done anything of the same sort since he was a child. But people buy into these lies and treat them as though they have some merit and thus spread the lies even further.

Yeah, that bugs me and should bug any decent minded person.


14 is only technically a "child". The family kept this hush-hush. The family did not get him counseling, as it first said it did, which means that Mama and Papa Dugger lied like rugs when asked about this. Instead, when Mama and Papa Duggar found out that adventurous little Josh was fingering the pussies of FOUR of his sisters while they were sleeping and such, they sent him to a cop friend, one who BURIED the police report when it was FINALLY made, and that cop went to to land in jail himself, where he is serving a FIFTY SIX year sentence for child porn.

Yepp, Mama and Papa Dugger made some fine decisions all along, of course, all in the name of Jesus, yadayadayada, so that they could rake in $$$$$ as the big, wholesome Christian family, when in reality, their oldest son was destroying the lives of four of his sisters.

I am of the opinion that any person who supports the Duggars now has absolutely no moral compass at all, they are just hollow shells. Atheists, with whom I do not agree on most stuff, have more of a moral compass than the Duggars.

This is all about $$$$ and fame and G-d is no where in the picture. Mama and Papa Duggar made their decisions out of pure greed, which btw is one of the seven deadly sins in the Bible.

Oh, but who cares about that, they are "Christians", they are the "King's Kids", they can do whatever the fuck they want because they believe they are morally superior. Well, they are not.

And neither are you.

And mark my words, we are just at the beginning of this saga: more stories of abuse will come out with time. Once a child abuser, always a child abuser. I feel sorry for Josh Duggar's own kids and don't even want to know what evils he has wreaked upon them behind their own four walls.
 
I don't watch cable. Have never heard of the Duggars before this controversy.

But I do know hypocrisy, when I see it.

Remember Lena Dunham's revelation she molested her sister????????

Lena Dunham Describes Sexually Abusing Her Little Sister Truth Revolt

But anyone that called foul on this was a "right wing nut." They were intolerant, and bigoted and blah blah blah.

Lena Dunham defends herself against accusations of sexual abuse - LA Times

Jimmy Kimmel Defends Lena Dunham Mediaite

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dg...ce-between-josh-duggar-and-lena-dunham-again/

But, the left sure have jumped on this Duggar thing. Why, I have no idea and really don't care. If the guy is guilty. Lock him up and throw away the key.

But the double standard is obvious, and I know the left will go crazy, because I dare point it out.






The problem is Dunham is a liar, so what do you believe when she says something? She says things to garner publicity and freak people out. The Duggars though seem to have been protecting a pedophile in their midst, and THAT is reprehensible.

Prove he is still a pedophile, liar.





I don't have to. The criminal justice system is going to have far more information than I ever will. I was merely addressing the difference between the two. No need to get your panties in a bunch, it was an observation and nothing else.

Yeah, you will just repeat slander by way of example.

Moral values have really disappeared in this country. There is no evidence Josh has done anything of the same sort since he was a child. But people buy into these lies and treat them as though they have some merit and thus spread the lies even further.

Yeah, that bugs me and should bug any decent minded person.


14 is only technically a "child".

Yeah its only technically a child when it suits a libtard like you and of no difference when you want to count them as children. There have been gun studies cited by libtards like you that count everyone under the age of 21 as a child, and you hypocrital liars say nothing to make any distinction.

You really have no clue how people are aware of your agit prop bullshit now, do you?
 
The problem is Dunham is a liar, so what do you believe when she says something? She says things to garner publicity and freak people out. The Duggars though seem to have been protecting a pedophile in their midst, and THAT is reprehensible.

Prove he is still a pedophile, liar.





I don't have to. The criminal justice system is going to have far more information than I ever will. I was merely addressing the difference between the two. No need to get your panties in a bunch, it was an observation and nothing else.

Yeah, you will just repeat slander by way of example.

Moral values have really disappeared in this country. There is no evidence Josh has done anything of the same sort since he was a child. But people buy into these lies and treat them as though they have some merit and thus spread the lies even further.

Yeah, that bugs me and should bug any decent minded person.


14 is only technically a "child".

Yeah its only technically a child when it suits a libtard like you and of no difference when you want to count them as children. There have been gun studies cited by libtards like you that count everyone under the age of 21 as a child, and you hypocrital liars say nothing to make any distinction.

You really have no clue how people are aware of your agit prop bullshit now, do you?

You can feel free to rant and rave and scream and squawk like a typical RWNJ knuckedragging idiot all you want, but it won't erase facts.

FACT: Josh Duggar. as a 14 year old, sexually molested at least 5 girls, and 4 of them were his own sisters.

FACT: the parents didn't do a goddamned thing about this for at least ONE FUCKING YEAR.

FACT: when they did send him away, it was to a cop-friend of the family, one who is now serving a FIFTY SIX year jail sentence for child porn.

FACT: when first asked whether Josh really did receive counseling for his sexual misdeed, his parents blatantly lied and said he did. Later, the Mama backpedaled and softy admitted that it was not so.

FACT: in one of the most unusual moves in Arkansas history, a judge ordered that the Duggar file be destroyed. This has happened so rarely that no one in the state can remember the last time it happened.

And Christians want to talk about morals and honesty? Please.

This thing stinks to high Heaven.

But keep on protecting a sexual offender. Be my guest.

I expect nothing less than the absolute batshit crazy from the 100% ODS infected Right these days.

Carry on. Now, all you need is an upside-down flag and you will fit right in with all the other nutters here in USMB.
 
this is coming from the people who FORGAVE a sitting Democrat President for using his position of POWER over a woman who was the same age as his DAUGHTER.

and then tried to SMEAR her and her Reputation

so you'll all have to excuse me if I don't take these people SERIOUS over this crap that has NO BEARING on our lives
Trying it AGAIN, I see.....so, have you figured out the math yet that Lewinsky being 22 in 1998 is NOT the same as Chelsea being 18?
Actually there is a 7 year difference between the two women....when Chelsea was 18, Monica was 25 yrs old.... or when Monica was 22 years old, Chelsea was 15 yrs old. ;)



Math is not her thang. :D
 

Forum List

Back
Top