Another female teacher caught having sex with children

[Meister]

Another angle about these AoC laws and their being too high is the discrimination aspect. If a sixteen year old can get a driver's license then the law is recognizing that being sufficient age to do that. But if the state's AoC is higher than 16 then it's in effect discriminating based on age. And that's against Federal laws (though admittedly more about the opposite end of the age spectrum.) So unless the state can prove how 16's ok to drive and make life and death mature decisions doing that, but not capable of making similar decisions to have sex, the law should be ammended down to 16.

Until the laws are changed, it's a crime....PERIOD. No matter what you think, Delta.

What other super powers do you possess, Captain Obvious?

At least I don't have the mindset that if it didn't hurt, it's good.....Lone Goofball.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Another angle about these AoC laws and their being too high is the discrimination aspect. If a sixteen year old can get a driver's license then the law is recognizing that being sufficient age to do that. But if the state's AoC is higher than 16 then it's in effect discriminating based on age. And that's against Federal laws (though admittedly more about the opposite end of the age spectrum.) So unless the state can prove how 16's ok to drive and make life and death mature decisions doing that, but not capable of making similar decisions to have sex, the law should be ammended down to 16.

Until the laws are changed, it's a crime....PERIOD. No matter what you think, Delta.

Not disputing it being a crime. Just saying it's one of many that needs to be updated to better reflect reality.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And you know that you "had zero priests in my parish with that issue" because they announce it in the little church news thing the nuns run off on the mimeo every week?

Its this attitude that has made it so easy for them to get away with molesting little kids. The worst though is that stupid parents are so invested in their belief that there are "zero priests in [their] parish with that issue" they actually continue to take their kids to church and allow them to be alone with slimy priests.

I have a pretty good kid toucher radar, I knew the two assholes in scouts who were prrobably kid touchers, and kept our younger kids the hell away from them. Turns out both of them got pinched years later.

And keep brushing that wide brush of yours because you have a seperate axe to grind with the church. And keep defending school unions that defend the assholes in the schools who do this, because of course, it fits your political agenda.

Neddit and JoeB are disgusting. They strut out for the pedos every damned time.

It's interesting to note, that it's usually liberals who are the ones that have no problem with teachers who hump their adolescent students.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Until the laws are changed, it's a crime....PERIOD. No matter what you think, Delta.

What other super powers do you possess, Captain Obvious?

At least I don't have the mindset that if it didn't hurt, it's good.....Lone Goofball.

Meister is correct: the law is the law.

Also it is sexist to treat female predators differently than their male counterparts.

Predation is predation.

Males no more want women judging than women want males judging them in these situations.

 

[SwimExpert]

A 24 year old woman who desires a sexual relationship with 15 year olds is not in a healthy state of mind. A 24 year old teacher who desires a sexual relationship with students is in an even less healthy state of mind.

A 15 year old who enters into a sexual relationship with said teacher is engaging in an extremely unhealthy dynamic at a pivotal stage in their human development, with the potential to substantially and negatively influence their ability develop sexually in a healthy way. Even if he "loved it" at the time.

An adult who chooses to be so reckless and subject a child to such circumstances commits an extreme offense against society.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

I have a pretty good kid toucher radar, I knew the two assholes in scouts who were prrobably kid touchers, and kept our younger kids the hell away from them. Turns out both of them got pinched years later.

And keep brushing that wide brush of yours because you have a seperate axe to grind with the church. And keep defending school unions that defend the assholes in the schools who do this, because of course, it fits your political agenda.

Neddit and JoeB are disgusting. They strut out for the pedos every damned time.

It's interesting to note, that it's usually liberals who are the ones that have no problem with teachers who hump their adolescent students.

And Congressmen humping their Pages is?

 

[MikeK]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

 

[Samson]

What other super powers do you possess, Captain Obvious?

At least I don't have the mindset that if it didn't hurt, it's good.....Lone Goofball.

Meister is correct: the law is the law.

Also it is sexist to treat female predators differently than their male counterparts.

Predation is predation.

Males no more want women judging than women want males judging them in these situations.

Depends on how you define "is."

 

[martybegan]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

She is whatever is the female equivalent of a pederast.

Its still fucking creepy and illegal.

 

[Samson]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

Well, she engaged in oral, which, according to Bill Clinton, isn't really sex, thus making the post vs pre pubescent issue mute.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

She is whatever is the female equivalent of a pederast.

Its still fucking creepy and illegal.

Pederasty's different from pedophilia/pedophile. It's more about the non-sexual teaching relationship common in the ancient world where men taught boys how to be men. It sometimes included sex, but not always nor is it specificly a sexual thing.

The appropriate term for a 15yo and adult is ebopophilia. Or, having difficulty pronouncing (and typing that) 'jail-bait' works.

The root pedo refers to young or youth, philia means love. So since pederasty contains the root is why people assume it's about pedophilia when it's actually not. Just means youth and whatever 'asty' is.

 

[High_Gravity]

Where were all these teachers when I was in High School dammit!!!

Thats what I'm saying smh.

 

[asterism]

Neddit and JoeB are disgusting. They strut out for the pedos every damned time.

It's interesting to note, that it's usually liberals who are the ones that have no problem with teachers who hump their adolescent students.

And Congressmen humping their Pages is?

Reelected if he's a Democrat.

Housecleaning - TIME

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

Yeah, kind of splitting hairs though. I've seen a lot of kids this age that are no where near ready to handle this kind of situation.

 

[Samson]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

Yeah, kind of splitting hairs though. I've seen a lot of kids this age that are no where near ready to handle this kind of situation.

You know Justin Bieber?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Hardly a week goes by that one of these teacher pedophiles doesn't get busted.

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

Yeah, kind of splitting hairs though. I've seen a lot of kids this age that are no where near ready to handle this kind of situation.

Punishing the majority for the inability of the minority isn't how laws usually work. Have only to look at other civilized nations with lower ages of consent to see all the proof you may require that having sex at younger ages doesn't correlate into trauma or harm. How our society denounces sex and especially older-younger relationships is what causes the harm, not the act itself.

 

[Samson]

It's interesting to note, that it's usually liberals who are the ones that have no problem with teachers who hump their adolescent students.

And Congressmen humping their Pages is?

Reelected if he's a Democrat.

Housecleaning - TIME

ZIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNG!

 

[MikeK]

A 24 year old woman who desires a sexual relationship with 15 year olds is not in a healthy state of mind. A 24 year old teacher who desires a sexual relationship with students is in an even less healthy state of mind.

There is a significant difference between finding an adolescent sexually attractive, as many adolescents are, and acting on one's natural impulse, the key factor being the degree of the adolescent's apparent maturity. Keep in mind that Tracy Lord became a celebrated porn queen at age fifteen by presenting a fake birth certificate to the producers of her films. At age fifteen Tracy was exceptionally mature, as are many adolescents.

A 15 year old who enters into a sexual relationship with said teacher is engaging in an extremely unhealthy dynamic at a pivotal stage in their human development, with the potential to substantially and negatively influence their ability develop sexually in a healthy way. Even if he "loved it" at the time.

The pivotal consideration here lies in the word, potential. The key factors being an adolescent's psychological orientation and the overall behavior and intentions of the adult consort.

An adult who chooses to be so reckless and subject a child to such circumstances commits an extreme offense against society.

I believe that disposition applies more to adult men than to adult women. There are important differences between engaging in heterosexual activity with adolescent boys and adolescent girls, beginning with the root factor of potential pregnancy. Social attitudes toward adolescent sexual activity are starkly different where girls are concerned.

 

[Meister]

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

Yeah, kind of splitting hairs though. I've seen a lot of kids this age that are no where near ready to handle this kind of situation.

Punishing the majority for the inability of the minority isn't how laws usually work. Have only to look at other civilized nations with lower ages of consent to see all the proof you may require that having sex at younger ages doesn't correlate into trauma or harm. How our society denounces sex and especially older-younger relationships is what causes the harm, not the act itself.

You're starting to creep me out with your seemingly pro view of this kind of behavior regarding adults sexual relationships with children.

 

[martybegan]

In this example the teacher is not a pedophile because the student is age fifteen and presumably post-pubescent (sexually mature). She would be considered a pedophile if she engaged in sexual activity with a pre-pubescent infant.

Yeah, kind of splitting hairs though. I've seen a lot of kids this age that are no where near ready to handle this kind of situation.

Punishing the majority for the inability of the minority isn't how laws usually work. Have only to look at other civilized nations with lower ages of consent to see all the proof you may require that having sex at younger ages doesn't correlate into trauma or harm. How our society denounces sex and especially older-younger relationships is what causes the harm, not the act itself.

Then how do you explain gun control laws, drug laws, and other nanny state crap?