Yes those went on to college and got a liberal arts degree.Yes, but obviously 90% of students don't learn shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes those went on to college and got a liberal arts degree.Yes, but obviously 90% of students don't learn shit.
And should only those who take it serious enough to study for a test be allowed to vote? (I sure wish it were so). Should only lawyers get a lawyer? Should there be a test/certification process for the free press? Hillary sure thought so; do you?
There are no limits to the extent of gun control. You've given the government permission to operate outside of the Constitution. All that's left is for you to beg them to let you keep some of your guns. They won't, of course; in the end they'll take them all.
When they take them all, you won't have a valid complaint because you said it was OK for them to ignore "shall not be infringed" because it made you feel good - and you can't even tell which gun control laws actually saved lives - because none do.
Once again, you're not willing to answer which of the gun control laws that you support and defend actually prevent crime and make the world safer.
While you're answering, if you'll answer, please define constitutional carry.
I never had a toy gun with an orange tip. It wasn't until 1992 that toy guns were required to have orange tips.
Many bad guys also put orange tips on their guns to slow down police reactions when they see them.
Tip or no tip should not be the decision maker for the cops to shoot. The cops need to evaluate the behavior and actions of the person. Far too many times, the police shoot people for simply being close to a gun, in cases where they claim fear for their life but admit to never seeing a gun.
I remember many stories, including video on TV, when the police talked down a man with a gun rather than shot them. Now cops who talk down a man with a gun get fired for not shooting them.
What has increased the number of police killing is the made up concept of qualified immunity. It's one of very few legal topics that bring together the very extremes of Justices, Thomas and Sotomayor, agreeing that there is no constitutional or legal basis for it.
![]()
What is ‘qualified immunity’ for police and why are there calls to end it? - Poynter
Plus, the two-part test to overcome immunity, how pro athletes are getting involved, coming legislation, local angles for you to explore, and more.www.poynter.org
Thomas is right, there is no basis for qualified immunity. But of all the government officials who should NOT have it, it is the police. They are the government officials, more than any others, who can do the most harm, and interact the most, with the people.
Without qualified immunity, the police will go back to trying to solve problems without the use of their guns; they used to be good at it.
The shooter may have been done and maybe not, but he got his mass shooting and there was no way of preventing that.So you're going to argue that Dicken didn't actually save any lives; that the shooter was done anyway? You're a fucking moron.
He fucked around and found out.The end result when you have an armed civilian. FYI the guy is wearing a mask and skinny jeans.
View attachment 672634
Why do you hate the fact Dicken stopped this shooter?The shooter may have been done and maybe not, but he got his mass shooting and there was no way of preventing that.
That's the reason why I'm suggesting that american needs vigilantes who can spot a potential shooter and then shoot first. Sort of like the police do in a limited way.
Look at that worthless little piece of shit staining the floor.You fucking removed the picture because you didn't like it? Let it be a lesson to anyone that thinks they can go on a shooting rampage and not get shot. One more time this is what a leftist will look like
View attachment 672699
Right, so why is your Canadian ass telling Americans that we must give up our guns to stop mass shootings?The shooter may have been done and maybe not, but he got his mass shooting and there was no way of preventing that.
You got the wrong impression if you think I want you all to give up your guns. For nearly a month now I've been saying it's the American culture of war and killing people that's the problem.Right, so why is your Canadian ass telling Americans that we must give up our guns to stop mass shootings?
If you are being attacked you have the right to defend yourself using the appropriate amount of force. You can use lethal force if you serious believe you’re attack intends to put you in the hospital for an extended period of time or six feet under and has the means and ability to do so.Isn’t Ahmaud Arbery an example of that?
Why do you hate the fact Dicken stopped this shooter?You got the wrong impression if you think I want you all to give up your guns.
Based on history it’s you that gets removed next.You fucking removed the picture because you didn't like it? Let it be a lesson to anyone that thinks they can go on a shooting rampage and not get shot. One more time this is what a leftist will look like
View attachment 672699
Actually I'm sort of disappointed in the fact that he didn't stop the shooter before he got his mass shooting.Why do you hate the fact Dicken stopped this shooter?
Why do you hate the fact Dicken stopped this shooter?Actually I'm sort of disappointed in the fact that he didn't stop the shooter before he got his mass shooting.
You keep saying this. Do you know what happened in the Kenosha that night?The Rittenhouse incident can promise some possibilities!