🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

AnOTHER Open Challenge for my AGW Friends

Ocean currents effect temperatures. Ocean currents change all the time. Ocean currents do not explain ice age vs. no ice age. Only tectonic plate movement and latitude do...
You really need help.
 
Ocean currents effect temperatures. Ocean currents change all the time. Ocean currents do not explain ice age vs. no ice age. Only tectonic plate movement and latitude do...
Sure they do
 
We have ice age glaciers here in Oregon ... as far south as the Southern Sierras ...

The melting of ice age glaciers along the equator is disrupting tourism there ... {Cite} ...

[giggle] ...
 
We have ice age glaciers here in Oregon ... as far south as the Southern Sierras ...

The melting of ice age glaciers along the equator is disrupting tourism there ... {Cite} ...

[giggle] ...
By "ice age glaciers" I presume you mean glaciers that have been present since the last glacial period. I don't think that's what EMH means by the term, but there's really no telling.
 
Not quite. The Pacific Ocean currents are like the wind. They do not control ice ages.

This is what you and crock are equating....




Alaska has ice just on top of mountains.... and has trees and grass north of Arctic Circle...


Alaska Maps & Facts - World Atlas



Greenland is in continent specific ice age and has mile thick ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle, as well as 7% of Earth ice (AA has 90%)


Greenland Physical map • mappery




Maybe when land gets to 600 miles of an Earth pole, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and it starts to stack, and that is the start of a continent specific ice age....

but it requires an IQ over 5 to think that through....
Good lord, you are a moron.

The Arctic Circle proper cuts through the top third of Alaska. Alaska is located 1,824.84 mi (2,936.80 km) south of the North Pole.

Two-thirds of Greenland lies within the Arctic Circle, and the island's northern extremity extends to within less than 500 miles (800 km) of the North Pole.
 
Crick claims there are no proofs in the natural sciences.
Except….


“At this point in time, we tend to place much trust in the natural sciences. "Scientific proof" has almost become some sort of guarantee of the quality or veracity of knowledge. Unfortunately, this trust can be abused. The cosmetics industry may seduce you to buy their latest anti-wrinkle cream by fiddling with statistics and plastering "scientific sounding language" on the packaging of its products. Research funded by entities that benefit from its findings will often eliminate inconvenient data and truths.“
 
the solution increases pollution by increasing the size and use of Heavy Industry

Hydro is only carbon-neutral in its production of electricity ... building the dam is extremely carbon-intensive ... anything with cement ... including nuclear plants ...

The solutions are more damaging than the problems of carbon dioxide ... curtailing Hamas is a good enough reason to conserve oil ... don't you think? ... only morons put solar panels on coal seams ...
 
Hydro is only carbon-neutral in its production of electricity ... building the dam is extremely carbon-intensive ... anything with cement ... including nuclear plants ...

The solutions are more damaging than the problems of carbon dioxide ... curtailing Hamas is a good enough reason to conserve oil ... don't you think? ... only morons put solar panels on coal seams ...
You have been shown over and over and over again that the CO2 produced during construction is rapidly offset by producing power without emissions. It's a simple and obvious point, yet you keep ignoring it or blatantly denying it as you did here with the statement I've highlighted. You're actually well beyond the point at which an objective observer would conclude that poster Reiny Days is a liar.
 
You have been shown over and over and over again that the CO2 produced during construction is rapidly offset by producing power without emissions. It's a simple and obvious point, yet you keep ignoring it or blatantly denying it as you did here with the statement I've highlighted. You're actually well beyond the point at which an objective observer would conclude that poster Reiny Days is a liar.
Says the guy who won't discuss the bizarre, unsupported, extreme magnification of the instantaneous GHG effect of CO2.
 
Hydro is only carbon-neutral in its production of electricity ... building the dam is extremely carbon-intensive ... anything with cement ... including nuclear plants ...

The solutions are more damaging than the problems of carbon dioxide ... curtailing Hamas is a good enough reason to conserve oil ... don't you think? ... only morons put solar panels on coal seams ...
hydro, all the good rivers have big dams, so there is no way to expand hydro

curtailing hamas?
 

Forum List

Back
Top