Another reason to abandon the demorat party

[Harry Dresden]

but yet you just cant seem to answer what i asked.....if i was so wrong then respond to what i asked.....are there intolerant and violent republicans/conservatives out there?...

I fail to see what point you are trying to make. Do people jaywalk?

But you have an entire political apparatus who have sworn Oaths of Destruction, Hatred Vitriol, Violence, and have Murder in their hearts.

We aren't talking about a random jay walker. We are talking about a MOB OF JAYWALKING SON OF A BITCHES who don't give a phuck about the law, our Republic, or anyone whom in their Self Righteous Indignation, does not deserve to live, or even have an independent thought apart from their collective, simply because they believe in The Constitution, and The Rule of Law, and Individual Freedoms.

The Democrat Party is a Real Life Version of "The Walking Dead." They only look human. They aren't human. They don't even make good pets.

and yet you cant see your own parties warts?....you cant even say "yes im sure there are righties out there who are intolerant of others and would resort to violence".....its called being a party person....i understand....

It doesn't benefit anyone to agree with your "exceptions" because exceptions to the rule are no defense for what is going on with your Nazified Hate Group, formally called "THE DNC".

So until you admit that the party as a whole has engaged in numerous egregious acts in this election, there is no point in allowing you to point the finger at a few rogue "so called" Conservatives, that most people would renounce and reject as Conservatives, and technically are sleeping in bed with The DNC.

but yet you just cant seem to answer what i asked.....if i was so wrong then respond to what i asked.....are there intolerant and violent republicans/conservatives out there?...

I fail to see what point you are trying to make. Do people jaywalk?

But you have an entire political apparatus who have sworn Oaths of Destruction, Hatred Vitriol, Violence, and have Murder in their hearts.

We aren't talking about a random jay walker. We are talking about a MOB OF JAYWALKING SON OF A BITCHES who don't give a phuck about the law, our Republic, or anyone whom in their Self Righteous Indignation, does not deserve to live, or even have an independent thought apart from their collective, simply because they believe in The Constitution, and The Rule of Law, and Individual Freedoms.

The Democrat Party is a Real Life Version of "The Walking Dead." They only look human. They aren't human. They don't even make good pets.

and yet you cant see your own parties warts?....you cant even say "yes im sure there are righties out there who are intolerant of others and would resort to violence".....its called being a party person....i understand....

It doesn't benefit anyone to agree with your "exceptions" because exceptions to the rule are no defense for what is going on with your Nazified Hate Group, formally called "THE DNC".
So until you admit that the party as a whole has engaged in numerous egregious acts in this election, there is no point in allowing you to point the finger at a few rogue "so called" Conservatives, that most people would renounce and reject as Conservatives, and technically are sleeping in bed with The DNC.

i have no problems saying both parties have people in them who are intolerant assholes of anyone who dont agree with them and would resort to violence....how come you cant?.....

I already told you, that I reject phony Conservatives. And most Mainstream Americans do too. That is why Trump ran against 16 of them and put them to sleep. He exposed each one of them one by one.

And when he ran in the general election, he ran against 4 major challengers, and about 1,700 other people on the ballot for president.

It was the most watered down presidential election in history, and yet he won the Electoral Vote in a Landslide.

You should be asking yourself why, not looking to deflect, and pivot and defend your point of view with a "Tu Quoque" Defense.

Trump himself is not a true Republican. He is a moderate, and independent, who used the GOP party to launch his candidacy. He high jacked it. The GOP has been undergoing reform, through pressure exerted by grass routes groups like The Tea Party, and Libertarians.

Americans want their country back.

Learn from that.

the only thing i am learning from you is that you just cant bring yourself to say that the right has lots of intolerant assholes too.....we have a bunch of them that post here daily.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

I see no useful, positive, unifying message from The Democrat Party.
neither do i,but i dont see one from your side either,its all a bunch of talk......and i assume you dont want to admit there are intolerant and violent people in your party....they are called the far right,no different than the far left,just different outlooks on life....but both are intolerant of anyone different than them and will use violence if needed to get their way....

Yet we dont see republicans rioting in the streets when they dont get their way.

keep dancing here we go....but at least let me put some music on for you.....dont worry your good friend dean does the same thing when he does not want to answer a question....

You refuse to acknowledge that democrats are far more violent than republicans.

did i disagree with that post where i said "so are many republicans"?.....no i did not,i hate them as much as i hate republicans....but yet YOU cant seem to even acknowledge that there are intolerant republicans out there and that if given a reason would use violence as a recourse....how come?...i have no problems saying they both have factions that are intolerant and can and would use violence....

Of course there are.
The only reason you bring it up is to somehow show justification for the actions of democrats who by far are more violent than republicans.

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

 

[HenryBHough]

Democrats are intolerant and violent.

OK, you hit their best points. Now, what's wrong with them?

 

[Harry Dresden]

I see no useful, positive, unifying message from The Democrat Party.
neither do i,but i dont see one from your side either,its all a bunch of talk......and i assume you dont want to admit there are intolerant and violent people in your party....they are called the far right,no different than the far left,just different outlooks on life....but both are intolerant of anyone different than them and will use violence if needed to get their way....

Yet we dont see republicans rioting in the streets when they dont get their way.

keep dancing here we go....but at least let me put some music on for you.....dont worry your good friend dean does the same thing when he does not want to answer a question....

You refuse to acknowledge that democrats are far more violent than republicans.

did i disagree with that post where i said "so are many republicans"?.....no i did not,i hate them as much as i hate republicans....but yet YOU cant seem to even acknowledge that there are intolerant republicans out there and that if given a reason would use violence as a recourse....how come?...i have no problems saying they both have factions that are intolerant and can and would use violence....

can you give us a few examples of violence by conservatives and republicans? We all know of thousands of examples of violence by liberals, progressives, socialists, and democrats, got any by republicans and conservatives?

I'll wait.

you are kinda late to the discussion fish.....my question was....which these guys are dancing around.....are there republicans/conservatives who are intolerant of others and would resort to violence if they felt wronged....ill wait for your answer ......

 

[Harry Dresden]

still no answer.....

We all know the truth,one of us refuses to acknowledge that truth.

and that is you.....but then you party people cant see your own warts....

Show me the riots.

....cant answer can you....

Not going to answer because your stance is ludicrous.

well i told you why you look at it like that.....you are a die hard party person...how dare me say that there are righties who are intolerant assholes just like many lefties.....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Yet we dont see republicans rioting in the streets when they dont get their way.

keep dancing here we go....but at least let me put some music on for you.....dont worry your good friend dean does the same thing when he does not want to answer a question....

You refuse to acknowledge that democrats are far more violent than republicans.

did i disagree with that post where i said "so are many republicans"?.....no i did not,i hate them as much as i hate republicans....but yet YOU cant seem to even acknowledge that there are intolerant republicans out there and that if given a reason would use violence as a recourse....how come?...i have no problems saying they both have factions that are intolerant and can and would use violence....

Of course there are.
The only reason you bring it up is to somehow show justification for the actions of democrats who by far are more violent than republicans.

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

 

[Harry Dresden]

keep dancing here we go....but at least let me put some music on for you.....dont worry your good friend dean does the same thing when he does not want to answer a question....

You refuse to acknowledge that democrats are far more violent than republicans.

did i disagree with that post where i said "so are many republicans"?.....no i did not,i hate them as much as i hate republicans....but yet YOU cant seem to even acknowledge that there are intolerant republicans out there and that if given a reason would use violence as a recourse....how come?...i have no problems saying they both have factions that are intolerant and can and would use violence....

Of course there are.
The only reason you bring it up is to somehow show justification for the actions of democrats who by far are more violent than republicans.

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You refuse to acknowledge that democrats are far more violent than republicans.

did i disagree with that post where i said "so are many republicans"?.....no i did not,i hate them as much as i hate republicans....but yet YOU cant seem to even acknowledge that there are intolerant republicans out there and that if given a reason would use violence as a recourse....how come?...i have no problems saying they both have factions that are intolerant and can and would use violence....

Of course there are.
The only reason you bring it up is to somehow show justification for the actions of democrats who by far are more violent than republicans.

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

 

[Edgetho]

Republicans:
We ARE the United States of America and we follow its founding principles

From Wiki, but it's accurate to the maximum --

Republicanism is the guiding political philosophy of the United States. It has been a major part of American civic thought since its founding.[1] It stresses liberty and unalienable individual rights as central values, making people sovereign as a whole, rejects monarchy, aristocracy and inherited political power, expects citizens to be independent in their performance of civic duties, and vilifies corruption.[2] American republicanism was founded and first practiced by the Founding Fathers in the 18th century. For them, according to one team of historians, "republicanism represented more than a particular form of government. It was a way of life, a core ideology, an uncompromising commitment to liberty, and a total rejection of aristocracy."[3]

Edge;
Also, as of tomorrow at noon, there will have been 19 Republican Presidents, 11 Democrat Presidents and the Lying Cocksucker should be the last of dimocrap SCUM presidents at 4. LBJ, The Peanut, The Rapist and the Lying Cocksucker. Since those scumbags ran on the democrat ticket, I guess listing them as 'democrats' would be appropriate but inaccurate for a total of --

19 Republicans, and
15 democrats

Although I think LBJ cared about the Country, he was such a scumbag that he must be included in the 'dimocrap scum' category. What a screw-up that moron was. Unreal. Same with The Peanut. Not a bad person, per se. Didn't hate the Country, but that boy could fuck up a one-car funeral.

The totals don't even include the Early Republican Party, led by Thomas Jefferson. It was Republican. There has never been a party called the 'democrat-republican' party in the United States. They were Republicans. Period

Modern day political scientists call them democratic-republicans because the party split and formed the Democrat Party in 1824 from which the Whigs sprang at that same time. Historians call them 'Republicans' because, a) That's what they were and, b) That's what they called themselves.

So if you include them (not saying you should) that would make 23 Republicans and 15 democrats.

Including Donald J Trump.

dimocraps better change their ways

 

[Pete7469]

are you telling me that there are no intolerant and violent republicans?...

Of course no one can truthfully say no.

Yet in comparison, democrooks have intolerance and violence locked down.

A republicrat gets out of line, police come and haul them away.

Democrooks get out of line and cops are ambushed by them.

 

[Harry Dresden]

did i disagree with that post where i said "so are many republicans"?.....no i did not,i hate them as much as i hate republicans....but yet YOU cant seem to even acknowledge that there are intolerant republicans out there and that if given a reason would use violence as a recourse....how come?...i have no problems saying they both have factions that are intolerant and can and would use violence....

Of course there are.
The only reason you bring it up is to somehow show justification for the actions of democrats who by far are more violent than republicans.

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

 

[Harry Dresden]

are you telling me that there are no intolerant and violent republicans?...

Of course no one can truthfully say no.

Yet in comparison, democrooks have intolerance and violence locked down.

A republicrat gets out of line, police come and haul them away.

Democrooks get out of line and cops are ambushed by them.

and i dont deny that happens pete....but when i have a few righties not wanting to say at least what you said....i have to push it.....the far right and left are not known for admitting they have assholes among them too...

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Of course there are.
The only reason you bring it up is to somehow show justification for the actions of democrats who by far are more violent than republicans.

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Repeat after me

I am a Democrat
I belong to the Democratic Party

Repeat after me.

I was a Democrat.

I no longer belong to the Democrat Party.

Sucks to be you.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Of course there are.
thank you....now was that so hard to do?....and i brought it up because unlike you,i am not one sided...i can see the bullshit on both sides...

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

its called a "conversation"....im sure you have had them before.....you know someone says something and someone answers and it goes on and it may go here or there....familiar with them?....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And what bullshit from the right would that be?
Now it's time for you to admit the left is far worse.

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

its called a "conversation"....im sure you have had them before.....you know someone says something and someone answers and it goes on and it may go here or there....familiar with them?....

No..it's called moving the goalposts because your position had become untenable.

 

[Harry Dresden]

what bullshit from the right?.....dam you are in deeper than what i thought you were.....like the politicians on the left,the politicians on the right do a lot of talking.....yea i was shocked too.....its called ...bullshit.....

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

its called a "conversation"....im sure you have had them before.....you know someone says something and someone answers and it goes on and it may go here or there....familiar with them?....

No..it's called moving the goalposts because your position had become untenable.

how?....you asked what bullshit from the right,and i gave you an answer...the only goal posts that were moved were the ones you moved back in the beginning of this conversation....there's that word again.......

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

What does that have to do with democrats and violence?

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

its called a "conversation"....im sure you have had them before.....you know someone says something and someone answers and it goes on and it may go here or there....familiar with them?....

No..it's called moving the goalposts because your position had become untenable.

how?....you asked what bullshit from the right,and i gave you an answer...the only goal posts that were moved were the ones you moved back in the beginning of this conversation....there's that word again.......

So you ran away from your original premise.
Cant say I blame you,it was ignorant as fuck.

 

[Harry Dresden]

nothing....i said i can see the bullshit on both sides, you asked me what bullshit,i gave you an answer....

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

its called a "conversation"....im sure you have had them before.....you know someone says something and someone answers and it goes on and it may go here or there....familiar with them?....

No..it's called moving the goalposts because your position had become untenable.

how?....you asked what bullshit from the right,and i gave you an answer...the only goal posts that were moved were the ones you moved back in the beginning of this conversation....there's that word again.......

So you ran away from your original premise.
Cant say I blame you,it was ignorant as fuck.

who refused to give an honest comment to what i asked?....that would be you.....who changed it to how many riots by righties,which does not disprove what i said,does it?.....you are as about as honest as your good buddy dean is....did you have lunch with him this week?.....you sound just like he does when he does not want to answer something......no wonder you call yourself what you do....

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

When did we switch from violent protests to politicians?

its called a "conversation"....im sure you have had them before.....you know someone says something and someone answers and it goes on and it may go here or there....familiar with them?....

No..it's called moving the goalposts because your position had become untenable.

how?....you asked what bullshit from the right,and i gave you an answer...the only goal posts that were moved were the ones you moved back in the beginning of this conversation....there's that word again.......

So you ran away from your original premise.
Cant say I blame you,it was ignorant as fuck.

who refused to give an honest comment to what i asked?....that would be you.....who changed it to how many riots by righties,which does not disprove what i said,does it?.....you are as about as honest as your good buddy dean is....did you have lunch with him this week?.....you sound just like he does when he does not want to answer something......no wonder you call yourself what you do....

Uh...I gave you an answer and you actually commented on my response.
Liberals are violent when they dont get their way.
So how much shit do you think liberals will start during the inauguration?