Another republican too eager to kill

[westwall]

Only if you leave it outside unattended

The enclosure MUST be escape proof. That means no one from outside, who isn't family, can open a gate to let the dog out.

Remember, the enclosure is INSPECTED, no just a simple leash, and gate.

 

[rightwinger]

In other words, YOU get fined, your dog gets taken away, and the authorities kill it!

DURRRRRR

Now you are just going goofy on us

Nobody requires shooting a puppy because it went after a chicken

Noem is a heartless bitch

 

[westwall]

Now you are just going goofy on us

Nobody requires shooting a puppy because it went after a chicken

Noem is a heartless bitch

Now you are just lying, as usual.

Your own ordinances, that YOU posted, prove you are lying.

 

[rightwinger]

The enclosure MUST be escape proof. That means no one from outside, who isn't family, can open a gate to let the dog out.

Remember, the enclosure is INSPECTED, no just a simple leash, and gate.

Most people keep their dog in the house and walk it on a leash.

If you leave the animal outside unattended you need signs and a secure enclosure

 

[rightwinger]

Now you are just lying, as usual.

Your own ordinances, that YOU posted, prove you are lying.

You are GOOFY
The ordinance says nothing of the kind

d) Requiring any area to which the dog has access when not under the direct control of the owner to be enclosed by fencing not less than six feet high or such other height as is allowed by the Monmouth Development Code, and constructed of materials and in a manner adequate to prevent escape;

You keep moving that goalpost

 

[westwall]

You are GOOFY
The ordinance says nothing of the kind

You keep moving that goalpost

Sure thing, little liar. I love how you post one thing, then post the exact opposite in the same thread.

Where in the ordinances does it say to give a vicious dog to a rescue group?

 

[cnm]

What do you do with a dog that is injured and can no longer hunt?

I suppose if it had a pleasant temperament one could make it a house dog, depending on its injury. And I think I'd hunt only over dogs with a pleasant temperament.

 

[HeyNorm]

serial killers always begin their sprees on helpless animals.

sometimes things happen. that is why we have a grossly underfunded charity organization to deal with it "humanely"

society for prevenmtion of cruelty to animals (spca)

Every farmer ever was a serial killer?

I never knew?

 

[rightwinger]

Sure thing, little liar. I love how you post one thing, then post the exact opposite in the same thread.

Where in the ordinances does it say to give a vicious dog to a rescue group?

I don’t know if you are fucking stupid or just an asshole

First you claim that no rescue group will take a dog that kills chickens. When proven wrong, you change your story

Then you claim that municipal ordinances require that a viscious dog be euthanized. When shown specific ordinances, you again change your claim

 

[rightwinger]

I suppose if it had a pleasant temperament one could make it a house dog, depending on its injury. And I think I'd hunt only over dogs with a pleasant temperament.

That is what humane dog owners do

 

[westwall]

I don’t know if you are fucking stupid or just an asshole

First you claim that no rescue group will take a dog that kills chickens. When proven wrong, you change your story

Then you claim that municipal ordinances require that a viscious dog be euthanized. When shown specific ordinances, you again change your claim

Post up a rescue group that will take livestock killers. You have proved nothing other than you are a prolific, and pathological liar.

The ordinances that you provided show that unless the owner of a vicious dog goes to great expense the dog will be put down. So, yet again you lie.

Basically, you lie.

 

[westwall]

That is what humane dog owners do

Killing chickens isn't a pleasant temperament. Now is it

 

[cnm]

It has nothing to do with politics, and everything to do with shooting a dog because it did not know the difference between a chicken and a pheasant

I got the impression it was because the dog turned on her when she tried to intervene. No?

I think that may have done it for me. Or not.

 

[cnm]

That is what humane dog owners do

I don't categorise dogs that turn on their owners in resentment to a command as having a pleasant temperament.

Though of course I didn't see the incident and have not even read her telling of it.

 

[westwall]

I got the impression it was because the dog turned on her when she tried to intervene. No?

I think that may have done it for me. Or not.

Yes, among many other reasons.

I have a 5 year old German Shepherd and she is a wonderful member of the family. When she was about 5 months old she started feeling her oats and nipped at me when I didn't go in a direction she wanted to go while on a walk.

I corrected her appropriately, and she never has done it again. She's smart as hell, and she knows she can nip at me when we are playing, but not if she gets mad.

Some dogs aren't smart and don't learn those lessons. Those are problem dogs no matter where they are.

 

[rightwinger]

Killing chickens isn't a pleasant temperament. Now is it

I would learn to live with it

Either don’t let the dog run unsupervised or pen your chickens

Taking it to the gravel pit and blowing her brains out is not an option I would consider

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

THat she "shot and killed the family's 14-month old puppy because it wasn't taking to being trained as a hunting dog."

Bullshit. You are lying.

Rawley, you are dweebing again. It's from the book.,

 

[westwall]

I would learn to live with it

Either don’t let the dog run unsupervised or pen your chickens

Taking it to the gravel pit and blowing her brains out is not an option I would consider

Bullshit. A dog like that won't stop at chickens.

 

[rightwinger]

Bullshit. A dog like that won't stop at chickens.

Yes
It turns into a serial killer

 

[rightwinger]

Who shoots a puppy?