Another Win for the Good Guys. CHPO Exonerated in Shooting of Ashli Babbitt

No Asslips, nobody but disgusting uneducated scum like you cheered a MURDER.
You need to make up your mind. First you say the whole world would rejoice in you murdering me and now you call people that do that disgusting uneducated scum? You need a time out. Youre getting way too emotional. :lol:
 
Had this been your liquor store (you sound drunk)...would you have wanted your security guard to ask if she was armed before opening fire on someone breaking through the door during a riot?

Lie to us all and say yes.
Stupid. This wasn’t a liquor store. It was the Capitol where police let protesters in.
 

This follows the DOJ investigation that also exonerated the officer. From the piece....

View attachment 529170

While there is no doubt that Babbitt's shooting was completely justified--the video from WAPO showed that, we should remember that this woman fought for our nation and for that she deserves our gratitude. We can add this to the sad lineage of President Trump who was responsible for the attack on the capitol and continues to lie about the 2020 election.


Its just a tragedy from every standpoint.


Is anyone surprised, I'd say it was a forgone conclusion in the district of corruption.

.
 

This follows the DOJ investigation that also exonerated the officer. From the piece....

View attachment 529170

While there is no doubt that Babbitt's shooting was completely justified--the video from WAPO showed that, we should remember that this woman fought for our nation and for that she deserves our gratitude. We can add this to the sad lineage of President Trump who was responsible for the attack on the capitol and continues to lie about the 2020 election.


Its just a tragedy from every standpoint.

Great news! Terrorism has consequences.
 
No one's lives were in danger, and legally Ashli's life is of equal value to anyone else's, including a president.
You legally can't shoot unless she has a deadly weapon.
That is the law.
There was no exception at play.
Your assertions are wrong but on the off chance that I am incorrect, would you please provide the board with the specific law you're citing

Since you've referenced the word "legally", "the law" and claim there are no exceptions to said law it would be really nice if you could cite it and let us know if it's a federal, state or other statute.
 
You can't clear someone of wrong doing when they obviously did it.
All you can do is make yourself an accomplice after the fact.
Now both have to be shot, since the failure to prosecute makes for a clear and present danger to society as a whole.
You are very confused in the use and definitions of the terminology here.

You can commit an intentional act and be cleared of any wrongdoing. Killing another person is generally an unlawful act however there are affirmative defenses to killing another that can make the killing justifiable (therefore no wrongdoing).

The self-defense laws are the exact set of laws that meet that definition and in fact were in play here in part as was "defense of others".

Law enforcement officers are granted powers by the state to engage in acts which if committed by a non law enforcement officer would be unlawful and for which they could be arrested and prosecuted. This fact alone should show you that an act can be intentional but not considered "wrongdoing" under our laws.
 
They were foolish and simple minded, but they were not criminals.
Only the DC police are now criminals, all of them.
They were not criminals?!? Maybe SOME of them when they woke up that morning but to my understanding almost 600 of them have been charged, many held in custody until they can be tried (I'm guessing they can't make bail?) and many of them have been convicted and sentenced.

They are most indeed criminals, some were before they showed and many new ones now.
 
WRONG!
None of the protestors were trying to seize anything.
To seize requires weapons.
All they were trying to do is be heard by our elitists in congress.
Occupying a building is not taking over a government.
The capital could burn down an it would have ZERO effect on government.
At this point you are just lying and making thing up.

{...
coup
[ko͞o]

NOUN
  1. a sudden, violent, and unlawful seizure of power from a government.
    "he was overthrown in an army coup"
    synonyms:
    seizure of power · coup d'état · overthrow · takeover · ousting · deposition·
    [more]
    ...}
Just because they were incompetent doesn't invalidate their intentions.
 
Obviously there is no way to change election results by occupying the capital building.
All they were doing is trying to have their opinion on election fraud to be heard.
Doesn't matter that they were wrong.
They still had that right to be heard, and occupying building is a tried and true tradition for expressing first amendment opinions.
According to you, only opinions you agree with deserve to be heard, which makes you a traitor.
That is not how a democratic republic works.
Didn't your parents ever teach you that there's a right way to do things and a wrong way to do thing?
 
Who told you she was not a threat to anyone?
Yeah they ALL keep repeating that lie over and over again in spite of having been told REPEATEDLY that the use of force dynamics change when the shooter is facing multiple assailants in the form of a violent mob.
 
What are you talking about?

Oh your man Biden. When George Stephanopolis referenced the Afghanis falling off the planes to their deaths in hopes of coming to the USA

That was his answer:

"That was, four or five days ago"

So this is now my answer to every liberal "atrocity" see: Trump, all of it. "Dude, that was like, four or five days ago"

 
Oh your man Biden. When George Stephanopolis referenced the Afghanis falling off the planes to their deaths in hopes of coming to the USA

That was his answer:

"That was, four or five days ago"

So this is now my answer to every liberal "atrocity" see: Trump, all of it. "Dude, that was like, four or five days ago"



Did you get lost?

I think you forgot which topic this is.
 

This follows the DOJ investigation that also exonerated the officer. From the piece....

View attachment 529170

While there is no doubt that Babbitt's shooting was completely justified--the video from WAPO showed that, we should remember that this woman fought for our nation and for that she deserves our gratitude. We can add this to the sad lineage of President Trump who was responsible for the attack on the capitol and continues to lie about the 2020 election.


Its just a tragedy from every standpoint.

Yeah.....

The DOJ clears him.

What a freaking joke.
 

Forum List

Back
Top