Anti-abortion activists indicted for undercover videos smearing Planned Parenthood

Where?
The law makes exceptions for rape, incest or life of the mother.
Congress is giving 600 million to PP to perform abortions, for one thing.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Still spouting bullshit you can't prove? :eusa_liar:

What a pity.
Prove you aren't an idiot.
I'm not you.
That's exactly what an idiot would say.
Can't be. I just proved I'm not an idiot.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

The prices weren't based on their costs. They were based on what the market would bear. That proves they are selling the organs.
 
For what?
For wrongly maligning Planned Parenthood over actions which turned out to be legal.

But that's ok, righties don't do apologies.

Planned Parenthood easnt doing anything wrong and that's why they stopped doing what they were doing...lol!
What do you think they stopped doing??

They stopped selling baby body parts. Where you been?

Planned Parenthood Won’t Accept Money for Fetal Tissue
They're still providing body parts.

You said they weren't. You need to keep your lies straight.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

They were selling body parts.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

If they weren't doing it, why did they stop doing it? LMAO!

if they were doing it why hasn't anybody been brought up on charges except for the lying criminals that faked the videos?? LMAO even more!!!

They weren't charged for the same reason this lame asset indictment has been brought...politics.
Not believable since 10 of the 12 states which investigated the matter are run by Republicans.
 
How is Obama's intentional ignoring and violation of our existing immigration laws a 'strawman'? He is the legitimate 'poster child' / example of how Liberals are willing to and have completely ignored and violated laws with which they disagree!

Liberals on this board are trying to make the claim that no tax dollars are spent on abortions NOT authorized in the Hyde Amendment BECAUSE THERE IS AN AMENDMENT / LAW THAT SAYS IT CAN'T BE DONE. So pointing out that Obama, 'King of the Liberals', has / IS ignored and violated existing law to do what he wanted to do DESPITE the Law.

Hillary is another example. In the interview with Cuomo posted yesterday Cuomo asked her if she was willing to admit she 'erred in judgment' in her e-mail scandal. She arrogantly declared 'No' she would not admit any such thing and tried to justify her actions by declaring her intent, when ordering her subordinate to strip the classification level off a document and send it via an unclassified method, was EXPEDIENCY. She wanted to send something quickly, which required stripping the classified markings off of the document, DESPITE the rules / laws dictating she could not legally do so ... and did it anyway. (The article included remarks from other subordinates claiming this practice was NOT a 1-time thing.)

So BOTH cases - Obama and Hillary - demonstrate the trend / practice of Liberals intentionally ignoring, by-passing, VIOLATING the law if it interferes in what they want to do. No 'strawman' - here, just establishing a proven trend among Liberals.
Translation: you STILL can't prove tax dollars are being spent on abortions as outlined in the Hyde Amendment.
thumbsup.gif

It has already been proved beyond all doubt. PP is getting federal money, and PP performs abortions. Ergo, tax dollars are being spent on abortion.
As always, you have failed miserably to prove that tax dollars are being applied to abortions beyond those performed as a result of rape, incest, and/or life threatening pregnancy.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

They were selling body parts.
They were allowed to sell them to cover their costs.

That's why no charges were brought against them even after 12 independent investigations.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

If they weren't doing it, why did they stop doing it? LMAO!

if they were doing it why hasn't anybody been brought up on charges except for the lying criminals that faked the videos?? LMAO even more!!!

They weren't charged for the same reason this lame asset indictment has been brought...politics.
Exactly. Activists exacting revenge via the legal system. That's about it.
 
How is Obama's intentional ignoring and violation of our existing immigration laws a 'strawman'? He is the legitimate 'poster child' / example of how Liberals are willing to and have completely ignored and violated laws with which they disagree!

Liberals on this board are trying to make the claim that no tax dollars are spent on abortions NOT authorized in the Hyde Amendment BECAUSE THERE IS AN AMENDMENT / LAW THAT SAYS IT CAN'T BE DONE. So pointing out that Obama, 'King of the Liberals', has / IS ignored and violated existing law to do what he wanted to do DESPITE the Law.

Hillary is another example. In the interview with Cuomo posted yesterday Cuomo asked her if she was willing to admit she 'erred in judgment' in her e-mail scandal. She arrogantly declared 'No' she would not admit any such thing and tried to justify her actions by declaring her intent, when ordering her subordinate to strip the classification level off a document and send it via an unclassified method, was EXPEDIENCY. She wanted to send something quickly, which required stripping the classified markings off of the document, DESPITE the rules / laws dictating she could not legally do so ... and did it anyway. (The article included remarks from other subordinates claiming this practice was NOT a 1-time thing.)

So BOTH cases - Obama and Hillary - demonstrate the trend / practice of Liberals intentionally ignoring, by-passing, VIOLATING the law if it interferes in what they want to do. No 'strawman' - here, just establishing a proven trend among Liberals.
Translation: you STILL can't prove tax dollars are being spent on abortions as outlined in the Hyde Amendment.
thumbsup.gif

It has already been proved beyond all doubt. PP is getting federal money, and PP performs abortions. Ergo, tax dollars are being spent on abortion.
As always, you have failed miserably to prove that tax dollars are being applied to abortions beyond those performed as a result of rape, incest, and/or life threatening pregnancy.

I proved it beyond all doubt.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

They were selling body parts.
They were allowed to sell them to cover their costs.

That's why no charges were brought against them even after 12 independent investigations.

You just admitted they sold body parts.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

The prices weren't based on their costs. They were based on what the market would bear. That proves they are selling the organs.
Oh? What are the going prices to procure, store, preserve, and transport fetal tissue?
 
How is Obama's intentional ignoring and violation of our existing immigration laws a 'strawman'? He is the legitimate 'poster child' / example of how Liberals are willing to and have completely ignored and violated laws with which they disagree!

Liberals on this board are trying to make the claim that no tax dollars are spent on abortions NOT authorized in the Hyde Amendment BECAUSE THERE IS AN AMENDMENT / LAW THAT SAYS IT CAN'T BE DONE. So pointing out that Obama, 'King of the Liberals', has / IS ignored and violated existing law to do what he wanted to do DESPITE the Law.

Hillary is another example. In the interview with Cuomo posted yesterday Cuomo asked her if she was willing to admit she 'erred in judgment' in her e-mail scandal. She arrogantly declared 'No' she would not admit any such thing and tried to justify her actions by declaring her intent, when ordering her subordinate to strip the classification level off a document and send it via an unclassified method, was EXPEDIENCY. She wanted to send something quickly, which required stripping the classified markings off of the document, DESPITE the rules / laws dictating she could not legally do so ... and did it anyway. (The article included remarks from other subordinates claiming this practice was NOT a 1-time thing.)

So BOTH cases - Obama and Hillary - demonstrate the trend / practice of Liberals intentionally ignoring, by-passing, VIOLATING the law if it interferes in what they want to do. No 'strawman' - here, just establishing a proven trend among Liberals.
Translation: you STILL can't prove tax dollars are being spent on abortions as outlined in the Hyde Amendment.
thumbsup.gif

It has already been proved beyond all doubt. PP is getting federal money, and PP performs abortions. Ergo, tax dollars are being spent on abortion.
As always, you have failed miserably to prove that tax dollars are being applied to abortions beyond those performed as a result of rape, incest, and/or life threatening pregnancy.

I proved it beyond all doubt.
No, you proved you're an idiot. But then, that's not new information.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

The prices weren't based on their costs. They were based on what the market would bear. That proves they are selling the organs.
Oh? What are the going prices to procure, store, preserve, and transport fetal tissue?

Are you claiming that PP doesn't know what its costs are?
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

They were selling body parts.
They were allowed to sell them to cover their costs.

That's why no charges were brought against them even after 12 independent investigations.

You just admitted they sold body parts.
Because they are allowed to charge for their costs.

Read the law and learn.
 
How is Obama's intentional ignoring and violation of our existing immigration laws a 'strawman'? He is the legitimate 'poster child' / example of how Liberals are willing to and have completely ignored and violated laws with which they disagree!

Liberals on this board are trying to make the claim that no tax dollars are spent on abortions NOT authorized in the Hyde Amendment BECAUSE THERE IS AN AMENDMENT / LAW THAT SAYS IT CAN'T BE DONE. So pointing out that Obama, 'King of the Liberals', has / IS ignored and violated existing law to do what he wanted to do DESPITE the Law.

Hillary is another example. In the interview with Cuomo posted yesterday Cuomo asked her if she was willing to admit she 'erred in judgment' in her e-mail scandal. She arrogantly declared 'No' she would not admit any such thing and tried to justify her actions by declaring her intent, when ordering her subordinate to strip the classification level off a document and send it via an unclassified method, was EXPEDIENCY. She wanted to send something quickly, which required stripping the classified markings off of the document, DESPITE the rules / laws dictating she could not legally do so ... and did it anyway. (The article included remarks from other subordinates claiming this practice was NOT a 1-time thing.)

So BOTH cases - Obama and Hillary - demonstrate the trend / practice of Liberals intentionally ignoring, by-passing, VIOLATING the law if it interferes in what they want to do. No 'strawman' - here, just establishing a proven trend among Liberals.
Translation: you STILL can't prove tax dollars are being spent on abortions as outlined in the Hyde Amendment.
thumbsup.gif

It has already been proved beyond all doubt. PP is getting federal money, and PP performs abortions. Ergo, tax dollars are being spent on abortion.
As always, you have failed miserably to prove that tax dollars are being applied to abortions beyond those performed as a result of rape, incest, and/or life threatening pregnancy.

I proved it beyond all doubt.
No, you proved you're an idiot. But then, that's not new information.

Your pathetic personal attacks only demonstrate what an impotent baboon you are.
 
they never did to begin with. that's what the various investigations by multiple states were all about. Texas indicting the liars that started this whole fraud is icing on the cake.

Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

The prices weren't based on their costs. They were based on what the market would bear. That proves they are selling the organs.
Oh? What are the going prices to procure, store, preserve, and transport fetal tissue?

Are you claiming that PP doesn't know what its costs are?
The woman negotiating on camera admitted she didn't know what the costs were.
 
Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

They were selling body parts.
They were allowed to sell them to cover their costs.

That's why no charges were brought against them even after 12 independent investigations.

You just admitted they sold body parts.
Because they are allowed to charge for their costs.

Read the law and learn.

As I already noted, they didn't charge according to their costs. They charged the market price for each organ.

You already admitted that they sold them.
 
Of course they did. They admitted on video that they would take money in exchange for body parts. How does that not meet the definition of "sell?"
Who said they can't sell fetal tissue? Have you even read the relevant law? Do you understand it? They are allowed to charge for their costs for things such as transporting fetal tissue, preserving it, storing it, etc....

The prices weren't based on their costs. They were based on what the market would bear. That proves they are selling the organs.
Oh? What are the going prices to procure, store, preserve, and transport fetal tissue?

Are you claiming that PP doesn't know what its costs are?
The woman negotiating on camera admitted she didn't know what the costs were.

ROFL! That's even better proof that they were selling the organs. How can anyone claim they were covering their costs when they admit they don't know what their costs are?
 
Translation: you STILL can't prove tax dollars are being spent on abortions as outlined in the Hyde Amendment.
thumbsup.gif

It has already been proved beyond all doubt. PP is getting federal money, and PP performs abortions. Ergo, tax dollars are being spent on abortion.
As always, you have failed miserably to prove that tax dollars are being applied to abortions beyond those performed as a result of rape, incest, and/or life threatening pregnancy.

I proved it beyond all doubt.
No, you proved you're an idiot. But then, that's not new information.

Your pathetic personal attacks only demonstrate what an impotent baboon you are.
Your lack of self awareness is noted and laughed at.

"That's exactly what an idiot would say." - bripat9643
 

Forum List

Back
Top