Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
I think that some groups are just more violent.... I think Government only is minimal in it..
But... Here's the thing... We could only cleanse the society of most of it's violence by Totalitarian Eugenics.
Some nasty genocides / mass murder events have indeed come from limited Governments too.
No government.
Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia - Wikipedia
Small government.
Rwandan genocide - Wikipedia
Very limited government.
Rhineland massacres - Wikipedia
No government.
Selk'nam genocide - Wikipedia
Virtually no government.
1971 Bangladesh genocide - Wikipedia
No government.
Darfur genocide - Wikipedia
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
. Yet it is not even remotely true, esp in Europe which is 99% antiIsrael. Silencing free press will lead to what
Hahaha..... Yeah.. Right..... Steal land from people who were living there... Then push a lot of them off to the edge... continue stealing their land (Settlement colonies) or create a Walled Off Buffer Zone with live gun fire against tresspassers (Sounds uber Nazi)
.,,,, Then
go to war where 6 of your civilians get killed, and 2,000 of the enemies civilians get killed.
Then if you get criticized it's somehow untrue...... HAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAH
That's how you remain in power.Hitler actually supported more Guns for Germans, however Jews on the other hand were disarmed.
That is false. The ONLY Germans who could get gun permits were Party members. They constituted less than 10% of the population of Germany. Gun control is used to separate the elite from the chattel. The book, The Nazi Seizure of Power go's in to great detail about how every weapon was regulated, including bayonets. You are quite astonishingly wrong on this account.
According to everything I've read right before Hitler there was already a massive gun ban in Germany, and Hitler loosened the guns for Germans in comparison but weakened them on Jews, and other enemies of the state.
Fact-checking Ben Carson's claim that gun control laws allowed the Nazis to carry out Holocaust
Try reading better sources.
"There is no shortage of theories or writings related to the rise of the Third Reich and the subsequent Holocaust. Stephen Halbrook’s 2013 book, Gun Control in the Third Reich offers a compelling and important account of the role of gun prohibition in aiding Hitler’s goals of exterminating the Jews and other “enemies of the state.” While much of the early gun prohibition was created with supposedly good intent, Halbrook carefully and meticulously details how a change in political regime facilitated manipulating some well-intentioned gun registration laws and other gun prohibition to be used in inconceivable ways.
Part II of the book opens with the naming of Hitler as chancellor of Germany at the end of January 1933, and the immediate utilization of the Weimar gun control policies to begin the Nazi campaign to seize arms and eradicate the so-called “enemies of the state” (all of whom were tagged as Communists). As a result, less than a month later, Hitler and Göring convinced President Hindenburg that an emergency decree was needed, which ultimately gave the Nazis the ability to eliminate constitutional assurances of liberty and free speech, a free press, the ability to assemble, and the right to privacy in personal communications. Furthermore, search and seizure of homes was authorized. This carte blanche for search and seizure essentially became the modus operandi of the Third Reich."
Gun Control in Nazi Germany
I'm an advocate of Gun rights.... Nazis did definitely disarm Jews, and enemies of the state.... Regular Germans on the other hand..... Actually saw a benefit in having more guns in comparison to the previous regime which created massive gun-control.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Totalitarianism usually favors Majorities over Minorities, or at least Might is Right.
How do you argue that's Left Wing social values?
Yes, that's kind of the appeal... Yes I do want to strengthen the power of the Majority to dominate the Minority.... Unlike our Liberal society which supports Minority over Majority.
But, NO, Truth be told I don't support extreme Totalitarianism.
I support enough Totalitarianism to combat our issues.
Plans include.
1.) Crack down on Hollywood, Media, and Academia promoting Liberalism. (Create a micro-managed Hollywood, Media, and Academia in it's place, where there's balance against Liberalism)
2.) Crack down on Capitalists who hire Immigrant foreigners. ( Jail those who hire them)
3.) Crack down on those who Outsource jobs. (Jail those who hire them)
4.) Support Racial separatism by revoking the citizenship of Blacks, Native Americans, and Hispanics. (Create more Black, and Native American homelands)
5.) Crack down on Abortion, Gay Marriage etc.
6.) Reward high IQ, non criminals for having kids with Tax Incentives, punish low IQ, Criminals for having more than 1 Kid with Fines. (To combat dysgenics)
I fail to see how "Individualists for Liberty" could possibly turn the tide on these issues?
The truth is my ideals only target degenerated Minorities who have for too long used Liberty to wield power of Liberalism over the Majority.
No, I don't support massive Totalitarianism, just as little as can be done to fix our society.
. Yet it is not even remotely true, esp in Europe which is 99% antiIsrael. Silencing free press will lead to what
Hahaha..... Yeah.. Right..... Steal land from people who were living there... Then push a lot of them off to the edge... continue stealing their land (Settlement colonies) or create a Walled Off Buffer Zone with live gun fire against tresspassers (Sounds uber Nazi)
.,,,, Then
go to war where 6 of your civilians get killed, and 2,000 of the enemies civilians get killed.
Then if you get criticized it's somehow untrue...... HAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAH
Not that a give a fuck what a moron like you believes, but you are dead wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.Wrong, Fascists are usually very Socially Conservative, and for Hierarchy, and Tradition. therefor they are moslty Right-Wing.
Economically Liberalism actually means Free Markets.
Most Americans are very, very Liberal.... Individualists are the true Liberals.
Right-wing politics - Wikipedia
Right-wing politics hold that certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal or desirable,[1][2][3] typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics or tradition.[4]. 693, 721[5][6][7][8][9][page needed] Hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences[10][11]or the competition in market economies.[12][13] The term right-wing can generally refer to "the conservative or reactionary section of a political party or system".[14]
Economic liberalism - Wikipedia
Economic liberalism is an economic system organized on individual lines, which means the greatest possible number of economic decisions are made by individuals or households than by collective institutions or organizations.[1] It includes a spectrum of different economic policies, such as freedom of movement, but its basis is on strong support for a market economy and private property in the means of production. Although economic liberalism can also be supportive of government regulation to a certain degree, it tends to oppose government intervention in the free market when it inhibits free trade and open competition.
Economic liberalism is most often associated with support for free markets and private ownership of capital assets. Historically, economic liberalism arose in response to mercantilism and feudalism. Today, economic liberalism is also considered opposed to non-capitalist economic orders, such as socialism and planned economies.[2] It also contrasts with protectionism because of its support for free trade and open markets.
An economy that is managed according to these precepts may be described as a liberal economy.
That's Fabian Socialist propaganda. Collectivist/Anarchy. Those are the two extremes dude.
The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.
I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.
However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.
That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.
That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
Hitler actually supported more Guns for Germans, however Jews on the other hand were disarmed.
That is false. The ONLY Germans who could get gun permits were Party members. They constituted less than 10% of the population of Germany. Gun control is used to separate the elite from the chattel. The book, The Nazi Seizure of Power go's in to great detail about how every weapon was regulated, including bayonets. You are quite astonishingly wrong on this account.
According to everything I've read right before Hitler there was already a massive gun ban in Germany, and Hitler loosened the guns for Germans in comparison but weakened them on Jews, and other enemies of the state.
Fact-checking Ben Carson's claim that gun control laws allowed the Nazis to carry out Holocaust
Try reading better sources.
"There is no shortage of theories or writings related to the rise of the Third Reich and the subsequent Holocaust. Stephen Halbrook’s 2013 book, Gun Control in the Third Reich offers a compelling and important account of the role of gun prohibition in aiding Hitler’s goals of exterminating the Jews and other “enemies of the state.” While much of the early gun prohibition was created with supposedly good intent, Halbrook carefully and meticulously details how a change in political regime facilitated manipulating some well-intentioned gun registration laws and other gun prohibition to be used in inconceivable ways.
Part II of the book opens with the naming of Hitler as chancellor of Germany at the end of January 1933, and the immediate utilization of the Weimar gun control policies to begin the Nazi campaign to seize arms and eradicate the so-called “enemies of the state” (all of whom were tagged as Communists). As a result, less than a month later, Hitler and Göring convinced President Hindenburg that an emergency decree was needed, which ultimately gave the Nazis the ability to eliminate constitutional assurances of liberty and free speech, a free press, the ability to assemble, and the right to privacy in personal communications. Furthermore, search and seizure of homes was authorized. This carte blanche for search and seizure essentially became the modus operandi of the Third Reich."
Gun Control in Nazi Germany
I'm an advocate of Gun rights.... Nazis did definitely disarm Jews, and enemies of the state.... Regular Germans on the other hand..... Actually saw a benefit in having more guns in comparison to the previous regime which created massive gun-control.
They declared almost everyone an enemy of the State.
Yes they still attack white nationalist, but only because white nationalist are easy targets. Everyone hates white nationalists. Republican, Democrats, liberals, conservatives, mainstream white, black, brown and yellow people despite them, not to mention they are rightfully villianized in the media. It doesn’t take much courage to confront them. They always have low turnout at their rallies (no one wants to associate with them) and protesters out number them 100 to 1.
Mark Bray wrote the Anti-Fascist Handbook, and does a pretty good job at explaining the evolution of the movement. The video is 26 minute so I only expect one of you to watch it. The rest of you will remain ignorant, yet continue to post as if you know what we are about.
In dictatorships it is forced upon people. Gun rights? Nope, your dictator hero’s always disarm the common folk.
Hitler actually supported more Guns for Germans, however Jews on the other hand were disarmed.
That is false. The ONLY Germans who could get gun permits were Party members. They constituted less than 10% of the population of Germany. Gun control is used to separate the elite from the chattel. The book, The Nazi Seizure of Power go's in to great detail about how every weapon was regulated, including bayonets. You are quite astonishingly wrong on this account.
According to everything I've read right before Hitler there was already a massive gun ban in Germany, and Hitler loosened the guns for Germans in comparison but weakened them on Jews, and other enemies of the state.
Fact-checking Ben Carson's claim that gun control laws allowed the Nazis to carry out Holocaust
Try reading better sources.
"There is no shortage of theories or writings related to the rise of the Third Reich and the subsequent Holocaust. Stephen Halbrook’s 2013 book, Gun Control in the Third Reich offers a compelling and important account of the role of gun prohibition in aiding Hitler’s goals of exterminating the Jews and other “enemies of the state.” While much of the early gun prohibition was created with supposedly good intent, Halbrook carefully and meticulously details how a change in political regime facilitated manipulating some well-intentioned gun registration laws and other gun prohibition to be used in inconceivable ways.
Part II of the book opens with the naming of Hitler as chancellor of Germany at the end of January 1933, and the immediate utilization of the Weimar gun control policies to begin the Nazi campaign to seize arms and eradicate the so-called “enemies of the state” (all of whom were tagged as Communists). As a result, less than a month later, Hitler and Göring convinced President Hindenburg that an emergency decree was needed, which ultimately gave the Nazis the ability to eliminate constitutional assurances of liberty and free speech, a free press, the ability to assemble, and the right to privacy in personal communications. Furthermore, search and seizure of homes was authorized. This carte blanche for search and seizure essentially became the modus operandi of the Third Reich."
Gun Control in Nazi Germany
I'm anti-Nazi... In fact I believe that Anthony Sutton accurately shows it was a Capitalist elite Wall Street product.
IMO.... Nazis were used by the elites to create a backlash for the modern society.
I believe the Elites feared Mussolini because his Fascism was popular and targeted the Elite, and promoted Nation first. (Anti-Globalism)
So, the Globalist Banker Capitalists financed Hitler to power, to basically have him kill as many of Europe's best, and brightest as possible,,,,,, To effectively create an ANTIFA backlash.... That they did this to detriment Fascism's chances, and to detriment the chances of Racial purity from taking hold.
..
...
.... HOWEVER Neo-Nazis believe the opposite.
They believe Hitler stood up to the Banks, Jews, and Free-Masons because he was Anti- Globalist N.W.O
It is possible.... Churchill, and FDR, and Truman were all Free-Masons.
...
... But.... I think Anthony Sutton makes that view skeptical.
..
.... My view 100% is definitely the Globalist scums used Hitler as a fall guy to create a Globalist Liberal backlash.... Whether as Neo-Nazis claim by Hitler losing the War, of all Wars against the N.W.O.... Or as I think a sort of False Flag..
Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.
characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic
characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Furthermore, fascist, socialist, and communist are all the same. They are all collectivist idealogies that advocate for a strong central government, and no power in the hands of the people.You came here accusing me of being a fascist without knowing the difference between fascist and anti-fascist, so let me help you out.
characteristics of fascism
pro dictatorship and anti-democracy
pro military, pro police
pro imperialist foreign policy
pro state, nationalist, xenophobic
pro toxic masculinity
racist, anti-semitic
characteristics of anti-fascism
pro peaceful foreign policy
pro community, pro worker rights
pro feminist and anti-racist
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.Not really, there's actually far more similarities between Republicans, and Democrats than between the groups you're describing.
It turns out most modern Republicans, and Democrats are probably actually Liberals by definition....
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality and international cooperation.
Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist. Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government, and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Oh please, Anarchy would lead to a society filled with Immigrants, Abortion, Druggies ,Porn, and Gay Marriage ( Social Liberalism) because they wouldn't do anything about these.
Most Fascists understand that in order to keep a Socially Conservative environment Totalitarianism is needed.
That's EXACTLY why Republicans have been failing, they support the freedom to be dominated by Liberalism, and Free markets sells out to Liberalism overwhelmingly.
Pure ignorance! You are a very unintelligent guy.
Totalitarianism, in the form of an unelected dictator, in theory could be a good thing if you get a good, strong and kind leader. A great King who makes all the right choices!
Yet that is a very rare occurrence. The vast majority of dictators let the power corrupt them, they create an elitist group of their cronies and the common folk suffer. They eventually are about only personal gain and see the people as pawns for their gain. Even if you get that very rare great and kind leader, they are usually followed by a unqualified child who led a privileged life and knows nothing of or doesn’t care about the suffering of others. Either way it leads to the same oppressive regime.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Wrong, you are the very unintelligent guy, like most of the Jews on this forum.
You didn't cover anything of what I said about lack of government leading to Social Liberalism.... You went off on some tirade about oppression....
Actually even Communist regimes were generally more Socially Conservative than Capitalist regimes.
Some Nationalists in Eastern Europe want Communism back, because Communism had much less immigration, worse rights for Gays, and less rights for Jews.
Yet it is because in oppressive dictatorships the vast majority of the people get oppressed and minorities get it the worst. You’re not a smart guy. In a dictatorship you would be one of the oppressed.
I thought you may have been man enough to admit you were wrong. This brings us back to my point about mods.I'm talking about the characteristics of the people.Wrong. There are only two governmental types. Collectivist and individualist.
Dittoheads are not going to like that at all. They are always telling us how much they cherish individualism.Totalitarian dictatorship is the ultimate form of collectivist government,
You just proved my point that anti-fascist is the polar opposite of fascist.and absolute anarchy is the ultimate form of individualist non government.
I am willing to take you to school anytime you are ready for the real world.Fascism, socialism, and communism are all fundamentally collectivist. Thus they are all left wing.
Sonny, you couldn't "school" my 11 year old daughter.
I specifically refer you to Phase Four of your very own antifart manual....ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. What does that mean?
Not liking fascists is something we all should agree on.So you agree the manual is fake?You do realize that manual is fake?I specifically refer you to Phase Four of your very own antifart manual....ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. What does that mean?
Have you ever listened to antifart people talk? Every one of them that I have ever talked to has advocated for a one world government. They extol the virtues of a strong central government. One of them that I spoke with at length wanted to do away with the concept of private property. Is that a central desire of antifa or was that merely his particular goal?
You are talking to Antifa right here and I happen to know a little about it. Quite a few of Antifa are anarchists. Others are democratic socialist like Sanders. I consider myself to be a progressive conservative, i.e., change when change is needed.
The only antifa I have talked with in depth were in Berkeley and they were all hard core socialist. To date I have not met a single one that was an anarchist.
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.That's Fabian Socialist propaganda. Collectivist/Anarchy. Those are the two extremes dude.
The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.
I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.
However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.
That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.
That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
I don't know how you figure this.
Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.
Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....
..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"
That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.
..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?
Okay?
Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?
That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.
I have the same right to deal with these imbeciles as I choose. You decided it is OK for a mod to equate me with fascists while being misinformed on what Antifa is about.These are people who refer to minorities as dogs or animals. They brag about the good old days when lynching was a fun way to spend the weekend. There is no way to avoid another civil war unless middle class suburbia wakes up to where we are headed.People are people. I know a few Antifa who are conservative or libertarian. Not liking fascists is something we all should agree on.
Anyone with a brain does, however, if you engage in acts of violence against people who are having a rally, and those people happen to have a philosophy that you don't approve of, you are engaging in fascist behavior. This is the USA and the ONLY language that is protected by the COTUS is hate speech. Lovey dovey speech doesn't need to be protected, but hate speech does. This country was founded on the principle that if you are a moron, and you want to tell the world just how big a moron you are, you have that Right. No one has the Right to shut them up.
Stop normalizing and protecting white supremacists. That allows them to think they are mainstream.
Yeah? So? That is what the First Amendment was written for. To protect imbeciles like that. I am not the one protecting them, the FIRST AMENDMENT is. If you don't like living in a country where people are encouraged to speak their minds then I suggest this isn't the country for you to live in.
USMB is infested with white supremacists so this is a good place as any for me to pimp slap these retarded crybabies.
you are violating their Right to free speech, and you are engaging in the tactics of fascism. Fascists deny the people their ability to speak.
And I know full well what antifa is about. I have eyes.
Mark Bray wrote the Anti-Fascist Handbook, and does a pretty good job at explaining the evolution of the movement. The video is 26 minute so I only expect one of you to watch it. The rest of you will remain ignorant, yet continue to post as if you know what we are about.
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.
I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.
However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.
That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.
That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
I don't know how you figure this.
Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.
Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....
..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"
That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.
..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?
Okay?
Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?
That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.
They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.
When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.
Collectivist governments concentrate power in the hands of the few. Individualist governments take power away from the few.The term Left-Wing terms come from Europe.... They seem to be not well understood in the U.S.A... Because our school systems don't focus much, if at all on them... If they do it's too late.
I don't deny that yes Nazis did have some Left Wing workers rights of Socialism.
However, everything else about Nazis was Far Right having an extreme support of Hierarchy, and extreme focus on Traditions, (Social Conservative values)
Aaaaaaand the Soviet Union under Stalin was what exactly?
Stalin obviously did believe in some ethnic hierarchy. struggles... So absolutely he's not a pure Leftist Communist by definition.
That's not to say that violence is necessary in ethnic disputes.... Obviously Stalin thought so in some cases.
That okay Stalin's mass-murder of Poles with bullets was a violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
Polish Operation of the NKVD - Wikipedia
'
But, that say Polish Soviet Golulka's anti-Zionist purge was which didn't really harm much of anything, was more of a assertive, but overall a non-violent ethnic hierarchy struggle.
1968 Polish political crisis - Wikipedia
I don't know how you figure this.
Collectivist governments limit the power of Capitalists, and support Worker's rights.
Actually looks like any government can lead to strong Inequality of class.... The U.S.A is also an example of this....
..
...
......I'd argue that Collectivist Totalitarian regimes first target the "Competitors" and "People who stand out"
That a Collectivist Totalitarian regime would actually by default eliminate the previous elite, first.... Because they are people who both stand out, and who are the biggest competitors.
..
.... Fascists are better than Communists for this.... Why do you think the elite have brainwashed everyone to be Anti-Fascist?
Okay?
Maybe because most Neo-Fascists would go after people like George Soros, the Rothschild's, the Rockerfellers, the Media, Hollywod, the Bush's, the Clinton's, and all the other elite scumbag Globalists?
That all Fascists are the antithesis of Globalism.... That they do support Nation first Autarky the opposite of Globalism.
They don't support workers Rights. They dictate to the worker what he can eat, where he works, what he will do and when, where he will live, and most importantly he is expected to die for the country. That's why the Soviet Union lost 25 million in WWII. The Germans lost 4.5 million in WWII, the Japanese lost 4 million in WWII. The USA lost 350,000. The British Commonwealth lost 400,000 in the war. Why the huge disparity? Because the capitalistic country's VALUE their people.
When a socialist country go's to war the individual soldier is a cog in a wheel. The Soviet Union famously cleared minefields by having their soldiers link arms and march through them. At least the Germans didn't do that, but that is the basic mentality of a socialist, vs a capitalist country. Capitalist country's value life, and socialist country's don't.
Mark Bray wrote the Anti-Fascist Handbook, and does a pretty good job at explaining the evolution of the movement. The video is 26 minute so I only expect one of you to watch it. The rest of you will remain ignorant, yet continue to post as if you know what we are about.
Aren't you supposed to be in some dark alley in some sleazy neighborhood peddling this crap?
Mark Bray wrote the Anti-Fascist Handbook, and does a pretty good job at explaining the evolution of the movement. The video is 26 minute so I only expect one of you to watch it. The rest of you will remain ignorant, yet continue to post as if you know what we are about.
Aren't you supposed to be in some dark alley in some sleazy neighborhood peddling this crap?
You're obviously not much of a thinker.
