K9Buck
Platinum Member
- Dec 25, 2009
- 15,907
- 6,522
The Jew and faithful follower of Jesus, John, was anti-Jewish?the Gospel of John is probably the most openly anti-Jewish
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Jew and faithful follower of Jesus, John, was anti-Jewish?the Gospel of John is probably the most openly anti-Jewish
Hillel combined Greek philosophy with Judaism, and was not believed to be a blasphemer.Actually, under Mosaic law, Jesus was a blasphemer. Most Jews would have wanted to murder him for trying to shoe-horn Greek Philosophy into Judaic law.
I doubt the author of the Gospel of John knew Jesus personally, or was Jewish.The Jew and faithful follower of Jesus, John, was anti-Jewish?
Hillel combined Greek philosophy with Judaism, and was not believed to be a blasphemer.
Claiming to be the Messiah was not regarded as blasphemy because someone was believed to be the Messiah.
You do not believe in free speech for the assertions of Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton are suppressed.Uh, yeah, we have this funny idea called "Free Speech".
Do you support the Biden Regime's efforts to shut down the speech of countless millions of people on X.Uh, yeah, we have this funny idea called "Free Speech".
In his book Redating the New Testament John Robinson prevents a plausible argument that the entire New Testament was written before the Jewish uprising of 66 to 73 AD. This is because there is no specific mention of that uprising anywhere in the New Testament. The Gospel According to St. John refers to buildings in the present tense that we know from other sources were destroyed during the uprising.I doubt the author of the Gospel of John knew Jesus personally, or was Jewish.
Actually, they executed a whole shitload of Messiahs over the years.
Do you support the Biden Regime's efforts to shut down the speech of countless millions of people on X.
Hate speech should not be tolerated.
Hate speech should not be tolerated.
All hate speech. Nobody is calling for any genocide except for Netanyahu and you appear to support that.Unless it's calling for the genocide of Jews, right?
puerile insults. I accept your concessionNo, we actually don't. And that black woman has nothing to do with this discussion. I don't find that frightening since she has been caught and blacks don't have the ability to pass laws with majorities that allow for race wars to start. So you racists can drop all your bs false equivalences because there ain't all that many blacks talking about a race war and burning down Kings house would not get blacks to start one. Meanwhile dirt like you threatens race war over your imagination that whites ate losing something they don't own in the first place.
How about telling the truth? Is that OK?
You are the one who conceded when you chose to go off topic.puerile insults. I accept your concession
Hate speech is often defined as any statements that are critical of blacks, even when those statements are obviously true.Hate speech should not be tolerated.
The Nazi effort to exterminate the most superior race in existence does not mean that the races are equal in average characteristics important to civilization.This thread was started by a person who claims to be Jewish but whose every post is filled with neo nazi rhetoric. Then when called on it, the person whines about anti semitism. Now if that's not pimping anti semitism or anti semitism hustling, then there is no such thing.
Most of the bombing raids happened long before D Day. I believe that after D Day, the only notable bombing of France that killed civilians were the raids on Cherbourg, and they were only necessary because Monty screwed up and didn't take the city as planned.No, you probably didn't. And there's a big difference between French Civilians being killed during the liberation of France.
We killed nearly a million Iraqis, most of them civilians. If you think that we just weren't killing enough people to win, you are delusional.
Objective studies put that number at less than 300,000 ,most of which were killed by other Iraqis.No, you probably didn't. And there's a big difference between French Civilians being killed during the liberation of France.
We killed nearly a million Iraqis, most of them civilians. If you think that we just weren't killing enough people to win, you are delusional.
Streisand is a liberals liberal. She is so far left that she doesn't make right turns when she drives.So let's read some more "anti semitism."
Barbra Streisand Under Fire Over Israel-Gaza Statement
Barba Streisand is facing criticism after sharing a statement surrounding the ongoing war in Gaza.
On October 7, Hamas launched an attack on Israel, which it said was retribution for worsening conditions for Palestinians under Israeli occupation.
MSN
www.msn.com
Streisand is Jewish. So this whining about anti semitism when what you are seeing is Anti-Netanyahuism or anti Likudism is disingenuous. But disingenuous is what the right excells at and it is why this bs hearing was called by the right wing do nothing for the American people but grandstand and dogwhistle congress.
“Death to Jews!!”All hate speech. Nobody is calling for any genocide except for Netanyahu and you appear to support that.