MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 40,477
- 19,724
- 2,290
Yes, she really is that cotton-picking stupid.No they aren't. Are you really that fucking stupid?The over sampling is brazen. They're skewering the polls blatantly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, she really is that cotton-picking stupid.No they aren't. Are you really that fucking stupid?The over sampling is brazen. They're skewering the polls blatantly.
Yet, whenever those same pollsters you're currently bashing presents data that, in your estimation, bashes Obama and/or his Administration, you're first in line to post them as gospel.The media uses models to do their predictions.
They talk to a few people and then they extrapolate it out to the population as a whole.
The basic model that most of the pollsters use is mostly based upon traditional Republican v Democrat demographics in previous elections.
Trump is a populist and that is a different model than the traditional Red v Blue.
For instance, Trump has made tremendous in roads in the blue collar White voters that may have voted Democrat in the past.
We also don't what the turnout of Black voters will be. They will vote in the same percentage for Crooked Hillary because they are dumbshits but we don't know if they will have the same numbers as they did for that asshole Obama.
Then you have the Bernie voters that are pissed at the DNC and Crooked Hillary. No telling how many of them will not vote for Crooked Hillary.
On top of that Crooked Hillary is hated and distrusted by a great many Americans.
Crooked Hillary is going to have a very hard time putting together the same coalition of greedy dumbasses that elected that piece of shit Obama.
The only poll that will really count is the one on election night.
[
dude...if trump is appealing to MORE democrat voters than a usual republican.. these poll #s are even WORSE for him.
jeebusss
They were boringly accurate about the majority of the primary campaigns. Took all the fun/surprise out of voting day. So why would they be inaccurate now? If they were trying to skew the numbers, they would lie about the # of GOP's. BTW, I've heard a lot of people say that the 40% of Independents in the country are going to decide the election. At least that amount is consistent with the reality. Don't know about the Repubs and Dems.So we've seen several polls showing Hillary trumping Trump royally!
Clinton and her running mate, Sen. Tim Kaine (Va.), now lead Trump and his running mate, Gov. Mike Pence (Ind.), by 50 percent to 42 percent among registered voters, double the four-point advantage the Democrats held on the eve of the Republican convention in mid-July. Among likely voters, the Democratic nominee leads by 51 percent to 44 percent.
BUT most people reading that poll don't go to the last page and see this:
10% MORE Democrats then GOP in the poll! So naturally she will be ahead.
But this is the only example of this gross misrepresentation of people being polled!
The Post-ABC poll was conducted Monday to Thursday among a random national sample of 1,002 adults interviewed on cellular and landline phones.
33% or 330 Democrats...... 23% or 230 GOP......... 36% or 360 Independent.
View attachment 85033
A clear lead for Clinton after the conventions - The Washington Post
Currently, 46% of registered voters support Clinton and 34% back Trump, with 7% supporting Libertarian Gary Johnson, and 2% backing Jill Stein of the Green Party.
Monmouth University
But go to the last page of the report...
26% or 215 GOP --- 39% or 298 independent --- 35% or 282 Democrat.
Again... tell me that the pollsters/MSM aren't biased!
the polls cant reflect the populist vote???[
dude...if trump is appealing to MORE democrat voters than a usual republican.. these poll #s are even WORSE for him.
jeebusss
Moon Bat, my name is not Dude.
Crooked Hillary is a terrible candidate for many reasons and Trump is appealing to the populist vote. The models used by the pollsters cannot accurately reflect that appeal now just like they could not do it with Reagan.
I don't know if Trump will win or not. Nobody does at this time.
The real question is can this Crooked Hillary piece of shit put together the same coalition of greedy Gruberidiots that elected that moron Obama.
She is going to have a lot harder time than most of you Moon Bats are willing to admit.
[]Yet, whenever those same pollsters you're currently bashing presents data that, in your estimation, bashes Obama and/or his Administration, you're first in line to post them as gospel.
Like I said in another topic, Trump has cornered the Unhinged vote. He will easily score 90+ percent of the Unhinged demographic on Election Day.
The outcome of the election will be determined by that single factor; how big the Unhinged demographic is, and how many of the crazy, stupid, credulous motherfuckers show up to vote.
If Trump wins, it will be because our country has jumped the shark and we are all fucked.
Nope. They are weighted according to political registration. There are less registered Republicans than there are registered Democrats.
So this is your idea of objectivity?[]Yet, whenever those same pollsters you're currently bashing presents data that, in your estimation, bashes Obama and/or his Administration, you're first in line to post them as gospel.
Of course people do that. It is human nature.
However, I am not voting for Trump or that stupid idiot Crooked Hillary so I am looking at it much more objectively than other Conservatives would.
Trump's populist appeal and Crooked Hillary's extensive corruption and dishonesty baggage will make it much more difficult for Crooked Hillary to put together the coalition of greedy assholes that voted in this moron Obama.
[]Yet, whenever those same pollsters you're currently bashing presents data that, in your estimation, bashes Obama and/or his Administration, you're first in line to post them as gospel.
Of course people do that. It is human nature.
However, I am not voting for Trump or that stupid idiot Crooked Hillary so I am looking at it much more objectively than other Conservatives would.
Trump's populist appeal and Crooked Hillary's extensive corruption and dishonesty baggage will make it much more difficult for Crooked Hillary to put together the coalition of greedy assholes that voted in this moron Obama.
Obviously the majority of people didn't learn that the polls/MSM are skewed and as such their information is biased.Oh look, the OP created the same exact thread in 2012. The conservative echo chamber is eating away at your brain cells.
A recent poll by Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted July 19-22/2012
Credibility Ratings for Most News Organizations.
I'm not going to present the biased poll results BUT want to know why the poll had:
384 independents, 286 Democrats and 239 Republicans, or 909 surveyed.
Now this is what many critics of polls are recently saying plain common sense would mean that by NOT having an equal number of Democrats/GOP /Independents you are biasing the results!
It is a FACT Independents LEAN more Democrat (17%) VS Independents LEAN GOP (13%)!
So of the 384 Independents 65 would lean Democrat or NOW a total of 286 Democrats PLUS Dem leaning Independents = total of 351 Demos.
Leaving GOP leaning Indes of 31 added to 239 GOP or a total of 270 GOP PLUS GOP leaning Indes equals 270 that would be GOP!
So in this poll of credibility 351 are Democrats/leaning Indes... AND the biased MSM leans Democrat.. THEN the Dems will have a higher
credibility of news by already biased Dems.
Common sense would say if almost 10% more responses came from Demo/leaning Independents THE RESULTS ARE SKEWED!!!!!
almost two-thirds of those who call themselves independent lean to either the Democratic or Republican Party.
This leaves no more than one in five American voters completely unattached to a party.
Independent Lean Democrat 17%
Independent Lean GOP 13%
Strong Democrat 18%
Not strong Democrat 12%
Independent, lean Democrat 17%
Independent, not lean 20%
Independent, lean Republican 13%
Not strong Republican 8%
Strong Republican 13%
Independent Does Not Mean Nonpartisan Or Non-Ideological | NDN
Here are the notes to the survey:
Margins of error are 7.4 points, 6.8 points and 5.8 points, respectively.
Not all partisans offered ratings of all news organizations.
As few as 183 Republicans and as many as 230 Republicans rated the various news outlets, with margins of error ranging from 7.5 to 8.4 percentage points.
As few as 222 Democrats and as many as 272 Democrats rated the news outlets, with margins of error from 6.9 to 7.7 percentage points.
Among independents, as few as 314 and as many as 363 rated the news outlets, producing margins of error of 6.0 to 6.4 percentage points.
Further Decline in Credibility Ratings for Most News Organizations - Page 2 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
[]Yet, whenever those same pollsters you're currently bashing presents data that, in your estimation, bashes Obama and/or his Administration, you're first in line to post them as gospel.
Of course people do that. It is human nature.
However, I am not voting for Trump or that stupid idiot Crooked Hillary so I am looking at it much more objectively than other Conservatives would.
Trump's populist appeal and Crooked Hillary's extensive corruption and dishonesty baggage will make it much more difficult for Crooked Hillary to put together the coalition of greedy assholes that voted in this moron Obama.
DumBama and Hillary are two different animals.
DumBama was well liked. People thought he had a wonderful personality, a great looking family, young, black, spoke well on a Teleprompter, dressed nicely.
He was an inspiration to black voters who came out in droves to make sure they voted in solidarity with DumBama. He had the same effect on college kids as well who wanted to be part of history and to shed their white guilt pounded into them from school to school.
Hillary doesn't have any of those things going for her. She's old, scratchy voice, her wardrobe is comical along with her hair styles, comes with a ton of baggage, she's filthy rich and sleeps in the same bed as Wall Street.
Besides the fact that we are in the middle of August and polls really don't mean anything right now rigged or not, it's the candidate that can inspire their voters to come out on election day to cast their ballot that really counts.
So how could we gauge that? Simple, just look at the turnouts at each of their events. Hillary could barely pack a high school basketball court while Trump is standing room only at major sports arenas and like.
Now the plan to victory is for Trump haters to put out the flame, to remove that inspiration truth or lies, to change Trump's wording to mean something entirely different than what he says. This works better on headline voters than those who actually read the articles or follow what's really going on.
You just don't know what you're talking about, that's all.Obviously the majority of people didn't learn that the polls/MSM are skewed and as such their information is biased.Oh look, the OP created the same exact thread in 2012. The conservative echo chamber is eating away at your brain cells.
A recent poll by Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted July 19-22/2012
Credibility Ratings for Most News Organizations.
I'm not going to present the biased poll results BUT want to know why the poll had:
384 independents, 286 Democrats and 239 Republicans, or 909 surveyed.
Now this is what many critics of polls are recently saying plain common sense would mean that by NOT having an equal number of Democrats/GOP /Independents you are biasing the results!
It is a FACT Independents LEAN more Democrat (17%) VS Independents LEAN GOP (13%)!
So of the 384 Independents 65 would lean Democrat or NOW a total of 286 Democrats PLUS Dem leaning Independents = total of 351 Demos.
Leaving GOP leaning Indes of 31 added to 239 GOP or a total of 270 GOP PLUS GOP leaning Indes equals 270 that would be GOP!
So in this poll of credibility 351 are Democrats/leaning Indes... AND the biased MSM leans Democrat.. THEN the Dems will have a higher
credibility of news by already biased Dems.
Common sense would say if almost 10% more responses came from Demo/leaning Independents THE RESULTS ARE SKEWED!!!!!
almost two-thirds of those who call themselves independent lean to either the Democratic or Republican Party.
This leaves no more than one in five American voters completely unattached to a party.
Independent Lean Democrat 17%
Independent Lean GOP 13%
Strong Democrat 18%
Not strong Democrat 12%
Independent, lean Democrat 17%
Independent, not lean 20%
Independent, lean Republican 13%
Not strong Republican 8%
Strong Republican 13%
Independent Does Not Mean Nonpartisan Or Non-Ideological | NDN
Here are the notes to the survey:
Margins of error are 7.4 points, 6.8 points and 5.8 points, respectively.
Not all partisans offered ratings of all news organizations.
As few as 183 Republicans and as many as 230 Republicans rated the various news outlets, with margins of error ranging from 7.5 to 8.4 percentage points.
As few as 222 Democrats and as many as 272 Democrats rated the news outlets, with margins of error from 6.9 to 7.7 percentage points.
Among independents, as few as 314 and as many as 363 rated the news outlets, producing margins of error of 6.0 to 6.4 percentage points.
Further Decline in Credibility Ratings for Most News Organizations - Page 2 | Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
Worthwhile then repeating because it just is NOT indicative of the true attitude of Democrats and Republicans.
Democrats see these results and this confirms their opinion. GOP see the results and says there is no hope!
To answer the OP question in the title of this thread...if you're based in reality, you believe the polls.
Simple.