Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
...
The correlation is obvious. Children all over the world understand this.
LOL...Uhm educate yourself...
NASA’s carbon-monitoring OCO-2 satellite confirms that El Nino weather boosts CO2
NASA’s carbon-monitoring OCO-2 satellite confirms that El Nino weather boosts CO2
Readings from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 have confirmed that the El Niño weather pattern of 2015-2016 was behind the biggest annual increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels in millennia.
View attachment 261347
Uhm educate yourself...
LOL...
Again?
I already schooled you on this, dope.
School who?
You were to stupid to comprehend what it said you stupid fuck
Tell us how living plants emit CO2, dope
didnt you graduate from the 2nd grade yet?didnt you graduate from the 2nd grade yet?
^ This is a grown man. Uff.
That only serves to show how much work is yet to be done.
Don't know how to read charts yet, huh?
What is shows is that nobody is doing more than us when it comes to Green. That's why other places have our jobs now.
LOL...
Our jobs?
Yep. When it becomes cheaper to make stuff out of this country and ship it in, companies move out and take the jobs with them. The greener we get, the more expensive it is to produce products here.
LOL...
Oh, I see. So now your new dopey line is that American jobs moved offshore due to climate regulations.
When you have to make shit up in an attempt to remain relevant, you've already lost.
You're better off just sticking to the sibject at hand.
^^^^^^^LOL...It's an odd claim. Let's say for the sake of argument that what she said is true.
Then the earth has lived through previous periods like this. So why worry about it?
Her claim undercuts her own apocolyptic arguments
Ummm what? The claim was that CO2 levels haven’t been this high in the history of ... read this slowly... humans.
The fact that they may have been higher at some time when humans didn’t exist is meaningless .
The point is that CO 2 levels this high affect human life in ways we are not going to like
Uhm educate yourself...
NASA’s carbon-monitoring OCO-2 satellite confirms that El Nino weather boosts CO2
NASA’s carbon-monitoring OCO-2 satellite confirms that El Nino weather boosts CO2
Readings from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 have confirmed that the El Niño weather pattern of 2015-2016 was behind the biggest annual increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels in millennia.
View attachment 261347
Uhm educate yourself...
LOL...
Again?
I already schooled you on this, dope.
School who?
You were to stupid to comprehend what it said you stupid fuck
Tell us how living plants emit CO2, dope
Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."
Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."
Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?
Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.
Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?
So, humans were not the cause of the 'high' CO2 levels 2 to 5 million years ago (because we did not exist) and now, CO2 levels are similar to back then and OC wants us to do just what? Excuse me but that is just fucking ignorant.
Dumbass Trumpettes.
There are many reasons CO2 levels can rise. Man is not the only one. We know man is causing the rise rhis time.
Quit being so stupid.
I agree. Political correctness is like the first dude that put a gerbil up his ass for fun. Too crazy.Political correctness is a mental disorderThere is no Paris accord without the US paying to clean up India and China. Maybe you can get some of your friends together and sell poppies on the corner to make up for the money Trump wisely withheld. Do your part, man.Your AC bill will go up & you might need a larger capacity system to handle more days of hotter temps.My heating bill will go down, I'll be able to golf longer and my garden will be happy with a little extra temperature. If you cry babies want to address world pollution, you need to turn your attention to China and, India like Trump is doing..
Longer hotter drier will not help your garden in July August & September.
India & China are addressed in the Paris Accord.
Nope. I realize how fucking ignorant you are but other countries were chipping in to hep poorer countries. Not just the USA.
The US along with other industrialized countries put us where we are today. You thinks the other countries should suffer because of that.
The first one to chime in this morning from the Blame America First crowd.
Pontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."
Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."
Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?
Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.
Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?
So, humans were not the cause of the 'high' CO2 levels 2 to 5 million years ago (because we did not exist) and now, CO2 levels are similar to back then and OC wants us to do just what? Excuse me but that is just fucking ignorant.
Dumbass Trumpettes.
There are many reasons CO2 levels can rise. Man is not the only one. We know man is causing the rise rhis time.
Quit being so stupid.
There is no proof man is causing any global rise in co2. Stop being a dumbass.
As we reduce emissions we can help reduce the projected temp rise.Ummm what? The claim was that CO2 levels haven’t been this high in the history of ... read this slowly... humans.
The fact that they may have been higher at some time when humans didn’t exist is meaningless .
The point is that CO 2 levels this high affect human life in ways we are not going to like
If nature caused CO2 to be much higher than before humans, then what is to say that very same nature isn't the cause of it today?
What you'd then be admitting to is all of the past promises by the global warming crowd was a lie. They told us we'd save the earth with CAFE standards. They told us we'd save the earth by making fuel burn cleaner. They told us we'd save the earth by eliminating the burning of our garbage in incinerators, getting lead out of all our products, and adding ethanol to our gasoline.
We did it all, and ten times more. And now we find out after all the trillions of dollars we've spent, it was all a lie? Not that I'm surprised mind you.Uff...If nature caused CO2 to be much higher than before humans, then what is to say that very same nature isn't the cause of it today?
Our ability to measure the output of CO2 shows us it isn't nature, dope.
No, it doesn't show anything of the sort. If there were any correlation between what we are doing and actual climate, our levels would be going down, wouldn't they? If you fix your leaky pipes under your kitchen sink, but still mopping up water all the time, obviously it must be something else, correct?No, it doesn't show anything of the sort. If there were any correlation between what we are doing and actual climate, our levels would be going down, wouldn't they? If you fix your leaky pipes under your kitchen sink, but still mopping up water all the time, obviously it must be something else, correct?
No, not correct at all.
The measurements don't show any natural sources of carbon emissions that even come close to human emissions.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas.
Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 by 50% since the industrial revolution.
The correlation is obvious. Children all over the world understand this.
But if we are decreasing our human made Co2 all the time, and it's not working, then obviously the additional CO2 is coming from somewhere else.
So we should allow more SO2 emissions to make diesel cheaper.?That only serves to show how much work is yet to be done.
Don't know how to read charts yet, huh?
What is shows is that nobody is doing more than us when it comes to Green. That's why other places have our jobs now.
LOL...
Our jobs?
Yep. When it becomes cheaper to make stuff out of this country and ship it in, companies move out and take the jobs with them. The greener we get, the more expensive it is to produce products here.
LOL...
Oh, I see. So now your new dopey line is that American jobs moved offshore due to climate regulations.
When you have to make shit up in an attempt to remain relevant, you've already lost.
You're better off just sticking to the sibject at hand.
No, what I said is environmental regulations add costs to businesses, and that's why they move out. Even if the business has nothing to do with the environment, they still have to pay electric and natural gas costs. Then when unions were big, that was a factor, plus we once had the highest corporate taxes in the industrialized world.
As a driver, I know the hundreds of thousands of additional dollars my boss has to pay out thanks to environmental costs every year, and we are a very small company. It started during the Bush administration where they made a maximum sulfur content for diesel fuel. Since then, the price of diesel fuel accelerated way beyond gasoline, whereas before, it was about a dollar a gallon cheaper than gasoline.
Because of all the pollution gadgets on a truck, they are much more expensive to purchase or lease. And nearly every time a truck experiences a problem, it usually has something to do with those gadgets. As you mentioned, DEF is another one. My employer has a tote for the stuff just so he can get it a little cheaper. We go through gallons of it every week.
So this all costs money, and we have to pass on those costs to our customers. Our customers manufacture products you and I buy all the time. However when it's made cheaper overseas, then the business has to close up and move overseas themselves.
You are that stupid. No one is killing babies after they are born.
Hmmm. Somebody thinks you are wrong here.
Jresus Fuck. How fucking stupid are you.
He is talking about babies born with severe deformities or other conditions with no chance of survival.
What the fuck do you want to do with these babies????? Make therm suffer more to treat trem when these treAtments will do no good?
My God you people are dumber than shit.
Oh, so you condone killing babies after they are born as well. Great to know that.
America led the world in emissions for decades. Fact.There is no Paris accord without the US paying to clean up India and China. Maybe you can get some of your friends together and sell poppies on the corner to make up for the money Trump wisely withheld. Do your part, man.Your AC bill will go up & you might need a larger capacity system to handle more days of hotter temps.My heating bill will go down, I'll be able to golf longer and my garden will be happy with a little extra temperature. If you cry babies want to address world pollution, you need to turn your attention to China and, India like Trump is doing..So you think nothing will change as our average global temperatures increase.
Longer hotter drier will not help your garden in July August & September.
India & China are addressed in the Paris Accord.
Nope. I realize how fucking ignorant you are but other countries were chipping in to hep poorer countries. Not just the USA.
The US along with other industrialized countries put us where we are today. You thinks the other countries should suffer because of that.
The first one to chime in this morning from the Blame America First crowd.
So,you think your emissions only affect you. Ummmmmm.unlike the 4.65 trillion dollar fossil fuel market."Follow the money!", you say?Scientists can work for corporations, universities, research firms, Fossil Fuel companies, think tanks, etc.Scientists don't make money from people buying EVs or green energies.
Correct, they don't. Scientists make their money off taxpayers, and politicians who provide those funds are behind global warming (or climate change if you desire).
Universities get federal funding along with grants from private organizations.
Now, who has the most to lose as we go green. What do the scientists they fund say?
Let's do just that.
I noted that “In America and around the globe governments have created a multi-billion dollar Climate Change Industrial Complex.” And then I added: “A lot of people are getting really, really rich off of the climate change industry.” According to a recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.”
...
How big is the Climate Change Industrial Complex today? Surprisingly, no one seems to be keeping track of all the channels of funding. A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term.
That didn’t include the tax subsidies that provide a 30 percent tax credit for wind and solar power — so add to those numbers about $8 billion to $10 billion a year. Then add billions more in costs attributable to the 29 states with renewable energy mandates that require utilities to buy expensive “green” energy.
Worldwide the numbers are gargantuan. Five years ago, a leftist group called the Climate Policy Initiative issued a study which found that “Global investment in climate change” reached $359 billion that year. Then to give you a sense of how money-hungry these planet-saviors are, the CPI moaned that this spending “falls far short of what’s needed” a number estimated at $5 trillion.
For $5 trillion we could feed everyone on the planet, end malaria, and provide clean water and reliable electricity to every remote village in Africa. And we would probably have enough money left over to find a cure for cancer and Alzheimers.
The entire Apollo project to put a man on the moon cost less than $200 billion. We are spending twice that much every year on climate change.
The rerally funny part with you deniers is that going green can save you money.
Buying higher MPG vehicles save you monet
Installing geothermal HVAC saves you money.
EVs can save you money.
Ignoring AGW & you will pay big time for the results like higher food costs, addressing coastline higher sea levels, more storm damage from storm surges, addressing more droughts, redoing HVAC systems to address higher temperatures . increasing our electrical grid, etc ertc etc.
So your plan is more expensive.
If you're concerned so much about me saving money, shouldn't that be my decision and not yours? You leftists are such control freaks.
No, the stupidly is thinking humans have no impact on our environment. Half of the rain forest and over 1000 species of animals have been destroyed by man in the last 100 years. We are rapidly turning our oceans into a trash dump. Populations of fish, marine mammals, birds and reptiles had fallen by 49 percent between 1970 and 2012. For fish alone, the decline was 50 percent. It's estimated that air pollution is now responsible 7 million premature deaths every year. Today only 3% of the water on the planet is freshwater and we are rapidly losing that in nearly half the world. And lastly, CO2 levels have now reached the highest level in human history./——/ What does the dumb bunny, AOC, have to say about this? California braces for feet of snow from storms; 'significant severe weather event' to impact PlainsPontificating at a Green New Deal rally on Monday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who just claimed on Sunday that her apocalyptic prediction in January that the world would end in 12 years unless serious action was taken to combat climate change had just been "dry humor," suddenly returned to her climate change hysteria, stating CO2 levels had reached the highest levels in recorded history and the last time the levels were this high "bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth."
Ocasio-Cortez ranted, “It was reported today that this weekend for the first time in human history we have reached atmospheric levels of carbon at 415 parts per million. This has never been seen in recorded human history. In fact meteorologist Eric Holthaus and journalist said simply about this measurement, ‘We do not know a planet like this.’ The last time our planet hit 415 we were in the Pliocene period. Oceans were 90 feet higher. Bacteria and diseases we have never seen before roamed the Earth. Humans did not exist. We have never seen a planet like this. And a planet like this is exactly what we are going to get, and it is exactly what we are going to inherit from previous generations if we do not act positively now."
Ocasio-Cortez Issues Another Apocalyptic Climate Rant. Is This More Of Her ‘Dry Humor’?
Only one question here: What technology and devices were used to make this measurement during the Pliocene period? I didn't even know what the pliocene period was. So I looked it up. It was a time frame between 2 and 5 million years. The wheel wasn't even invented yet.
Oceans were 90 feet higher? So why aren't oceans 90 feet higher today?
And they were predicting snow for the northeast last week. It's May for crying out loud.
If it's too cold, it's because of climate change. If it's too warm, it's because of climate change. If it's normal, it's because of climate change.
The stupidity is not believing in climate change. The stupidity is thinking we control it.
So,you think your emissions only affect you. Ummmmmm.unlike the 4.65 trillion dollar fossil fuel market."Follow the money!", you say?Scientists can work for corporations, universities, research firms, Fossil Fuel companies, think tanks, etc.Correct, they don't. Scientists make their money off taxpayers, and politicians who provide those funds are behind global warming (or climate change if you desire).
Universities get federal funding along with grants from private organizations.
Now, who has the most to lose as we go green. What do the scientists they fund say?
Let's do just that.
I noted that “In America and around the globe governments have created a multi-billion dollar Climate Change Industrial Complex.” And then I added: “A lot of people are getting really, really rich off of the climate change industry.” According to a recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.”
...
How big is the Climate Change Industrial Complex today? Surprisingly, no one seems to be keeping track of all the channels of funding. A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term.
That didn’t include the tax subsidies that provide a 30 percent tax credit for wind and solar power — so add to those numbers about $8 billion to $10 billion a year. Then add billions more in costs attributable to the 29 states with renewable energy mandates that require utilities to buy expensive “green” energy.
Worldwide the numbers are gargantuan. Five years ago, a leftist group called the Climate Policy Initiative issued a study which found that “Global investment in climate change” reached $359 billion that year. Then to give you a sense of how money-hungry these planet-saviors are, the CPI moaned that this spending “falls far short of what’s needed” a number estimated at $5 trillion.
For $5 trillion we could feed everyone on the planet, end malaria, and provide clean water and reliable electricity to every remote village in Africa. And we would probably have enough money left over to find a cure for cancer and Alzheimers.
The entire Apollo project to put a man on the moon cost less than $200 billion. We are spending twice that much every year on climate change.
The rerally funny part with you deniers is that going green can save you money.
Buying higher MPG vehicles save you monet
Installing geothermal HVAC saves you money.
EVs can save you money.
Ignoring AGW & you will pay big time for the results like higher food costs, addressing coastline higher sea levels, more storm damage from storm surges, addressing more droughts, redoing HVAC systems to address higher temperatures . increasing our electrical grid, etc ertc etc.
So your plan is more expensive.
If you're concerned so much about me saving money, shouldn't that be my decision and not yours? You leftists are such control freaks.
America led the world in emissions for decades. Fact.There is no Paris accord without the US paying to clean up India and China. Maybe you can get some of your friends together and sell poppies on the corner to make up for the money Trump wisely withheld. Do your part, man.Your AC bill will go up & you might need a larger capacity system to handle more days of hotter temps.My heating bill will go down, I'll be able to golf longer and my garden will be happy with a little extra temperature. If you cry babies want to address world pollution, you need to turn your attention to China and, India like Trump is doing..
Longer hotter drier will not help your garden in July August & September.
India & China are addressed in the Paris Accord.
Nope. I realize how fucking ignorant you are but other countries were chipping in to hep poorer countries. Not just the USA.
The US along with other industrialized countries put us where we are today. You thinks the other countries should suffer because of that.
The first one to chime in this morning from the Blame America First crowd.
You are that stupid. No one is killing babies after they are born.
Hmmm. Somebody thinks you are wrong here.
Jresus Fuck. How fucking stupid are you.
He is talking about babies born with severe deformities or other conditions with no chance of survival.
What the fuck do you want to do with these babies????? Make therm suffer more to treat trem when these treAtments will do no good?
My God you people are dumber than shit.
Oh, so you condone killing babies after they are born as well. Great to know that.
I condone allowing a new born baby to die in peace when there is nothing to do medically that can save it.
What do you want to happen?
As typical, you take no responsibility for your actions.So,you think your emissions only affect you. Ummmmmm.unlike the 4.65 trillion dollar fossil fuel market."Follow the money!", you say?Scientists can work for corporations, universities, research firms, Fossil Fuel companies, think tanks, etc.
Universities get federal funding along with grants from private organizations.
Now, who has the most to lose as we go green. What do the scientists they fund say?
Let's do just that.
I noted that “In America and around the globe governments have created a multi-billion dollar Climate Change Industrial Complex.” And then I added: “A lot of people are getting really, really rich off of the climate change industry.” According to a recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009.”
...
How big is the Climate Change Industrial Complex today? Surprisingly, no one seems to be keeping track of all the channels of funding. A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term.
That didn’t include the tax subsidies that provide a 30 percent tax credit for wind and solar power — so add to those numbers about $8 billion to $10 billion a year. Then add billions more in costs attributable to the 29 states with renewable energy mandates that require utilities to buy expensive “green” energy.
Worldwide the numbers are gargantuan. Five years ago, a leftist group called the Climate Policy Initiative issued a study which found that “Global investment in climate change” reached $359 billion that year. Then to give you a sense of how money-hungry these planet-saviors are, the CPI moaned that this spending “falls far short of what’s needed” a number estimated at $5 trillion.
For $5 trillion we could feed everyone on the planet, end malaria, and provide clean water and reliable electricity to every remote village in Africa. And we would probably have enough money left over to find a cure for cancer and Alzheimers.
The entire Apollo project to put a man on the moon cost less than $200 billion. We are spending twice that much every year on climate change.
The rerally funny part with you deniers is that going green can save you money.
Buying higher MPG vehicles save you monet
Installing geothermal HVAC saves you money.
EVs can save you money.
Ignoring AGW & you will pay big time for the results like higher food costs, addressing coastline higher sea levels, more storm damage from storm surges, addressing more droughts, redoing HVAC systems to address higher temperatures . increasing our electrical grid, etc ertc etc.
So your plan is more expensive.
If you're concerned so much about me saving money, shouldn't that be my decision and not yours? You leftists are such control freaks.
I don't think they affect anybody to be honest.
You are that stupid. No one is killing babies after they are born.
Hmmm. Somebody thinks you are wrong here.
Jresus Fuck. How fucking stupid are you.
He is talking about babies born with severe deformities or other conditions with no chance of survival.
What the fuck do you want to do with these babies????? Make therm suffer more to treat trem when these treAtments will do no good?
My God you people are dumber than shit.
Oh, so you condone killing babies after they are born as well. Great to know that.
I condone allowing a new born baby to die in peace when there is nothing to do medically that can save it.
What do you want to happen?
Letting the baby die naturally and putting it to sleep like a dog are two different things. If a baby ten years ago was beyond medical help, that's all they could do for a child, so this isn't what he's talking about.
So we should allow more SO2 emissions to make diesel cheaper.?Don't know how to read charts yet, huh?
What is shows is that nobody is doing more than us when it comes to Green. That's why other places have our jobs now.
LOL...
Our jobs?
Yep. When it becomes cheaper to make stuff out of this country and ship it in, companies move out and take the jobs with them. The greener we get, the more expensive it is to produce products here.
LOL...
Oh, I see. So now your new dopey line is that American jobs moved offshore due to climate regulations.
When you have to make shit up in an attempt to remain relevant, you've already lost.
You're better off just sticking to the sibject at hand.
No, what I said is environmental regulations add costs to businesses, and that's why they move out. Even if the business has nothing to do with the environment, they still have to pay electric and natural gas costs. Then when unions were big, that was a factor, plus we once had the highest corporate taxes in the industrialized world.
As a driver, I know the hundreds of thousands of additional dollars my boss has to pay out thanks to environmental costs every year, and we are a very small company. It started during the Bush administration where they made a maximum sulfur content for diesel fuel. Since then, the price of diesel fuel accelerated way beyond gasoline, whereas before, it was about a dollar a gallon cheaper than gasoline.
Because of all the pollution gadgets on a truck, they are much more expensive to purchase or lease. And nearly every time a truck experiences a problem, it usually has something to do with those gadgets. As you mentioned, DEF is another one. My employer has a tote for the stuff just so he can get it a little cheaper. We go through gallons of it every week.
So this all costs money, and we have to pass on those costs to our customers. Our customers manufacture products you and I buy all the time. However when it's made cheaper overseas, then the business has to close up and move overseas themselves.
America led the world in emissions for decades. Fact.There is no Paris accord without the US paying to clean up India and China. Maybe you can get some of your friends together and sell poppies on the corner to make up for the money Trump wisely withheld. Do your part, man.Your AC bill will go up & you might need a larger capacity system to handle more days of hotter temps.
Longer hotter drier will not help your garden in July August & September.
India & China are addressed in the Paris Accord.
Nope. I realize how fucking ignorant you are but other countries were chipping in to hep poorer countries. Not just the USA.
The US along with other industrialized countries put us where we are today. You thinks the other countries should suffer because of that.
The first one to chime in this morning from the Blame America First crowd.
Bullshit. We would be leading the world in reducing emissions & instead we have a moron for a President who calls science a hoax.
Fact, we do more to clean up our messes than anybody else in the world too.
