Zone1 Are Asian-Americans “The New Jews”?

Explain to me in your own words using the internet only to document your assertions that Murray is out of date.

The failure of Head Start and No Child Left Behind, and facts like this,

View attachment 826010

this

=========================
2006 College & University
Guidance, Scholarships, Money and Info Gateways
(For Students, Parents, College Advisors, Mentors,
and Cultural Groups)
==========================


SAT and ACT Scores by Race/Ethnicity: 2003

In recent years the noted pattern of test scores has reflected similar numbers--
Editor, 2005

SAT Ethnic Group Scores (Math/Verbal+total)

• American Indian---482/480 (962)
• Asian American-----575/508 (1083)
• African American-----426/431 (857)
• Puerto Rican----457/448 (905)

Other Hispanic----464/457 (921)

• White-----534/529 (1063)
• Other ----513/501 (1014)

Source: www.collegeboard.com

Average ACT Composite Score by Race/Ethnicity, 2003
----------------------------------------------------

• African American ----16.9
• American Indian---18.7
• Caucasian---- 21.7
• Mexican American----18.3
• Asian American---- 21.8
• Hispanic----19.0
• Other ----19.3
• Multiracial-----20.9
• Prefer Not to Respond -----21.8
• No Response-----20.1

Source: www.act.org

Quote from attached SAT/ACT article:

"Readiness for college science and math coursework was particularly low among
African American students. Only 5 percent of African American test-takers scored
at or above the college-readiness benchmark for college biology, and just 10
percent attained the readiness benchmark for college algebra. Ferguson said
Black students were less likely than others to take tough, college-prep courses
and "often don't receive the information and guidance they need to properly plan
for college."

For overview and more info, go to:
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0DXK/15_20/109265562/p1/article.jhtml

this,

View attachment 826011
and this,

View attachment 826013
Persuade me that The Bell Curve, which I have read, is correct.

Actually, The Bell Curve was prophetic. Since it was published in 1994, genes that influence intelligence and crime have been discovered.
Simple----YOU HAVE NO IDEA. -----you failed to IDENTIFY
the "INTELLIGENCE" and "CRIME GENES" ----you have no grasp of the branch of math called STATISTICS----and you probably failed High School Biology ---and simple Euclidean
geometry. You never held a brain in your hand. as to brain--yours is just as good as anyone's but your mind is unprepared.
You don't have the basic tool to deal with the issue in which you imagine yourself expert
 
Last edited:
Simple----YOU HAVE NO IDEA. -----you failed to IDENTIFY
the "INTELLIGENCE" and "CRIME GENES" ----you have no grasp of the branch of math called STATISTICS----and you probably failed High School Biology ---and simple Euclidean
geometry. You never held a brain in your hand. as to brain--yours is just as good as anyone's but your mind is unprepared.
You don't have the basis tool to deal with the issue in which you imagine yourself expert
MIT Technology Review
Scientists have linked hundreds of genes to intelligence. One psychologist says it’s time to test school kids.
April 2, 2018
A year ago, no gene had ever been tied to performance on an IQ test. Since then, more than 500 have, thanks to gene studies involving more than 200,000 test takers. Results from an experiment correlating one million people’s DNA with their academic success are due at any time.

The discoveries mean we can now read the DNA of a young child and get a notion of how intelligent he or she will be, says Plomin, an American based at King’s College London, where he leads a long-term study of 13,000 pairs of British twins.

---------

Crime Genes​


The MAOA gene is X-linked, and these men and others in successive generations all exhibited problem behaviour including impulsive aggression, arson and rape.
 
MIT Technology Review
Scientists have linked hundreds of genes to intelligence. One psychologist says it’s time to test school kids.
April 2, 2018
A year ago, no gene had ever been tied to performance on an IQ test. Since then, more than 500 have, thanks to gene studies involving more than 200,000 test takers. Results from an experiment correlating one million people’s DNA with their academic success are due at any time.

The discoveries mean we can now read the DNA of a young child and get a notion of how intelligent he or she will be, says Plomin, an American based at King’s College London, where he leads a long-term study of 13,000 pairs of British twins.

---------

Crime Genes​


The MAOA gene is X-linked, and these men and others in successive generations all exhibited problem behaviour including impulsive aggression, arson and rape.
the "study" you present is a JOKE. That there is a statistical
correlation---in the study of a large cohort---to this or that
score on an Aptitude test is UTTERLY MEANINGLESS----to
anyone with an even minimally prepared mind-----The first
page of the testbook on "INTRO TO LOGIC" 101-----
CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION
 
the [sic] "study" you present is a JOKE. That there is a statistical
correlation---in the study of a large cohort---to this or that
score on an Aptitude test is UTTERLY MEANINGLESS----to
anyone with an even minimally prepared mind-----The first
page of the testbook on "INTRO TO LOGIC" 101-----
CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION
The internet is full of websites discussing the discovery of IQ genes. I only choose one of them.

Writing in all capital letters does does not make your comment impressive; it makes you look like a crank who has fabricated your claims of professional expertise on this matter.

As more is learned about human genetics it will become increasingly obvious that Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton were right from the start. They have been brave men who experienced persecution for telling what most people are privately aware is true.
 
The internet is full of websites discussing the discovery of IQ genes. I only choose one of them.

Writing in all capital letters does does not make your comment impressive; it makes you look like a crank who has fabricated your claims of professional expertise on this matter.

As more is learned about human genetics it will become increasingly obvious that Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton were right from the start. They have been brave men who experienced persecution for telling what most people are privately aware is true.
wrong again----but there is no way to communicate with
a hard headed crank. LOL @ "most people"
 
wrong again----but there is no way to communicate with
a hard headed crank. LOL @ "most people"
Why did you not capitalize "wrong?" That is a mistake someone with the professional qualifications you claim for yourself would not have made.
 
Why did you not capitalize "wrong?" That is a mistake someone with the professional qualifications you claim for yourself would not have made.
LOL gee---in fact, you are wrong again----the statement I
wrote was not a sentence. HOWEVER, my professional
qualifications are not in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE----my
major field of study is neuroscience. As to English usage,
one could argue that the statement included an "understood"
'you are' as in " You are wrong again" in which "you" would
the subject and "are" the verb of 'the sentence'
 
What matters about the assertions of Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton is that a growing body of genetic research confirms their assertions.

Intelligence is the single greatest factor in determining academic and economic success. It is primarily determined genetically. People of some races are more likely to be intelligent than people of other races.

Since the 1960's we have wasted an enormous amount of money trying and failing to close the race gap. It is long since time to stop trying.

The only social experiment that has worked has been the increase in the prison population. More punishment = less crime. Less punishment = more crime.

The high cost of incarceration can be reduced by the thorough exploitation of prison labor, the frequent use of capital and corporal punishment, and the end of recreational and educational opportunities.
 
What matters about the assertions of Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton is that a growing body of genetic research confirms their assertions.

Intelligence is the single greatest factor in determining academic and economic success. It is primarily determined genetically. People of some races are more likely to be intelligent than people of other races.

Since the 1960's we have wasted an enormous amount of money trying and failing to close the race gap. It is long since time to stop trying.

The only social experiment that has worked has been the increase in the prison population. More punishment = less crime. Less punishment = more crime.

The high cost of incarceration can be reduced by the thorough exploitation of prison labor, the frequent use of capital and corporal punishment, and the end of recreational and educational opportunities.
your statement is, completely, without merit and, actually,
disgusting. Do you have colleagues or group members
who find you credible? Is your statement consistent with the
ideology of your church?
 
your statement is, completely, without merit and, actually,
disgusting. Do you have colleagues or group members
who find you credible? Is your statement consistent with the
ideology of your church?
Your statement has not refuted anything I wrote. It was just a lot of emotional blather.

I will repeat my statement. Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professor's Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton have said in various ways the following:

"Intelligence is the single most important factor in determining academic and economic success. Intelligence is primarily determined genetically. People of some races are more likely to be intelligent than people of other races."

There has never been any reason to doubt that. A growing body of genetics research confirms that it is true.
 
The statement was: "unlike the PRC, Taiwan still uses old Mandarin/Kanji characters in their newspapers"

Except it's not called "Kanji", it's called "Traditional Chinese", which was used on both the Mainland and Taiwan for centuries before the Communists developed simplified Chinese script.

Only a moronic Lefty&Lib like you, who has never been to Africa or South-East-Asia (unlike me) (and I am talking about living and working there for decades) not some holiday at some Hilton beach hotel - will try to raise an argument of him knowing more then me about these countries and it's people. you moron.

Again, you're Cliff Claven, claiming Filipinos are European and the people of Taiwan write in Kanji, and Europeans never did anything bad in Africa (lately).
 
the "study" you present is a JOKE. That there is a statistical
correlation---in the study of a large cohort---to this or that
score on an Aptitude test is UTTERLY MEANINGLESS----to
anyone with an even minimally prepared mind-----The first
page of the testbook on "INTRO TO LOGIC" 101-----
CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION
The MIT Technology Review can be considered a credible source of data. You have made it clear that you refuse to accept facts that conflict with what you want to believe.
 
I will clarify and end this debate:

intelligence Is primarily an inherited trait but can be positively impacted to an extent by one’s environment.
 
I will clarify and end this debate:

intelligence Is primarily an inherited trait but can be positively impacted to an extent by one’s environment.
Not ended----but it is certainly true that if the parents do not have a brain---the offspring do not have a brain
 
Not ended----but it is certainly true that if the parents do not have a brain---the offspring do not have a brain
Well, if the parents do not have a brain they would not be living at all.
 
High intelligence is both familial and heritable. Why is this a bad thing?

 
High intelligence is both familial and heritable. Why is this a bad thing?

in the minds of nazis the idea conjures up RACIAL brain
superiority which, in fact, does not exist in the Human
species and even IF it did-----standard IQ testing would not
come close to being a valid measure thereof nor would ---
the height of pyramids or who invented the wheel first
 
in the minds of nazis the idea conjures up RACIAL brain
superiority which, in fact, does not exist in the Human
species and even IF it did-----standard IQ testing would not
come close to being a valid measure thereof nor would ---
the height of pyramids or who invented the wheel first
The superior average intelligence if Ashkenazi Jews is well attested to by many sources.
 
in the minds of nazis the idea conjures up RACIAL brain
superiority which, in fact, does not exist in the Human
species and even IF it did-----standard IQ testing would not
come close to being a valid measure thereof nor would ---
the height of pyramids or who invented the wheel first
It’s not racial. Blacks with high IQs also tend to have children with high IQs.

MANY aspects of a person are inherited, and not just the physical - eye color, near-sightedness, hemophilia, and so forth - but personality traits as well. Introversion/extroversion is the most well-known, but other aspects are inherited as well, even extending to how motivated one is. I think we should face the evidence that shows intelligence is largely inherited as well.
 
You have never explained how the studies were "debunked." Denouncing and silencing, which is the way you think ideas and facts you dislike should be handled, is not the same as disproving.

Sure it is. Once you've determined something is absolute garbage, you discard it from the discussion. This is why Astrology, Alchemy, Creationism, and Phrenology are no longer considered "Sciences". Eugenics is no longer considered a serious science, either.

IQ tests have established a solid record for over a century of accurately predicting academic and economic success.

Except, the vast majority are not tested, and usually, only the affluent can afford the testing. So big surprise the affluent are more likely to test high and do well because of their privilege.

Those you call "racists" deserve polite discussion because we can explain the disappointments that resulted from the civil rights legislation and the War on Poverty.

No, you deserve an ass-kicking for being assholes. When you take your ideas to the audiences you consider to be the Untermenschen, and can convince them they deserve to be left behind, then you can get back to me.

The Civil Rights Movement was a disappointment because this country cannot atone for its sins. We built this country on GENOCIDE and SLAVERY, period. We can never make up for the awful things we did. So we are in denial of them.

MIT Technology Review
Scientists have linked hundreds of genes to intelligence. One psychologist says it’s time to test school kids.

Sorry, I have no desire to live in the live action version of GATTACA.
 

Forum List

Back
Top