🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Are blacks still owned by slave owners, i.e. Democrats/Progressives/Liberals???

And on the welfare state, regarding black women trending with more and more babies out of wedlock, (as with all other races)....

Although I have not seen specific demographics, or studies regarding this, my gut would say that something more than women having the liberty, and acceptance that they once did not have, is making these statistics of out of wedlock babies go higher that could be involved with welfare.

And of course, as a woman, I will defend these women who continue to have babies....I don't think it is because they are getting the limited amount of welfare benefits that most of them are getting...and having another child gives them more and more money....because there is a cutoff of the number of children written in to federal law that no longer pays more for more children, at least from my novice understanding of the law??? ....but because the Fathers of these children, are not coming through, are not having to do what they should do, as the Fathers of these children, and that is, provide for them...give them a life that is even better than their own, a future, a reason to live and strive for better, and want this for their own children, for goodness sakes....to me THAT'S the problem....the men feeling the government will just take care of their children...and walking away from his own flesh and blood family....

so maybe, if I am right...welfare does have something to do with the abandonment of the Father figure.

(black women have ALWAYS bore more children than white women as an example....can't ever remember a time when they did not, even when they were predominantly married families)

yes, abandonment of the Father figure, primarily in the black community, but not exclusively the black community.

but I don't know how to fix it, without harming the children that are born impoverished....so for now, it is the status quo for me....I accept paying welfare to those impoverished with my taxes, until we can come up with a better idea that does not harm people/children, more than help them....I wish we all could come up with a better idea...like putting these fathers to work, in a job that they were given the skills to do, that would give them higher income, so that they wouldn't be so afraid to take on the responsibility of being Fathers....

and also, imo, austerity for these women who need welfare to help feed their children, might lead to even MORE ABORTIONS as a result, and this is not my goal...I don't want to see even more abortions....nor should anyone.

What if you have people in the Administration literally advertizing for able-bodied folks to take advantage of the system.

What if they're pulling in hundreds of thousands of refugees from other countries only to down the road garner their votes. Offer them welfare and telling them who to vote for.
 
.

When you're conditioned from the day you're born to think that people are out to get you, that you're being cheated, that people are literally trying to hurt you, and that you need help to get ahead, simply because of the pigmentation of your skin, you're obviously going to think a certain way. It has nothing to do with intelligence; this is just the way we humans are built.

Multiply that by generations of families and the damage multiplies too.

Try to imagine what that would be like. Every minute of every day, 365 days a year, through your childhood, through your formative years, into adulthood. What a horrible, fucked up thing to do to a person, especially in America.

Psychological terror. Inter-generational victimization.

.

^^^ Completely describes the Liberal Plantation.
 
And on the welfare state, regarding black women trending with more and more babies out of wedlock, (as with all other races)....

Although I have not seen specific demographics, or studies regarding this, my gut would say that something more than women having the liberty, and acceptance that they once did not have, is making these statistics of out of wedlock babies go higher that could be involved with welfare.

And of course, as a woman, I will defend these women who continue to have babies....I don't think it is because they are getting the limited amount of welfare benefits that most of them are getting...and having another child gives them more and more money....because there is a cutoff of the number of children written in to federal law that no longer pays more for more children, at least from my novice understanding of the law??? ....but because the Fathers of these children, are not coming through, are not having to do what they should do, as the Fathers of these children, and that is, provide for them...give them a life that is even better than their own, a future, a reason to live and strive for better, and want this for their own children, for goodness sakes....to me THAT'S the problem....the men feeling the government will just take care of their children...and walking away from his own flesh and blood family....

so maybe, if I am right...welfare does have something to do with the abandonment of the Father figure.

(black women have ALWAYS bore more children than white women as an example....can't ever remember a time when they did not, even when they were predominantly married families)

yes, abandonment of the Father figure, primarily in the black community, but not exclusively the black community.

but I don't know how to fix it, without harming the children that are born impoverished....so for now, it is the status quo for me....I accept paying welfare to those impoverished with my taxes, until we can come up with a better idea that does not harm people/children, more than help them....I wish we all could come up with a better idea...like putting these fathers to work, in a job that they were given the skills to do, that would give them higher income, so that they wouldn't be so afraid to take on the responsibility of being Fathers....

and also, imo, austerity for these women who need welfare to help feed their children, might lead to even MORE ABORTIONS as a result, and this is not my goal...I don't want to see even more abortions....nor should anyone.

What if you have people in the Administration literally advertizing for able-bodied folks to take advantage of the system.

What if they're pulling in hundreds of thousands of refugees from other countries only to down the road garner their votes. Offer them welfare and telling them who to vote for.
The way the Dream act has been written, only those of illegals, that have lived in the Usa for a minimum of 5 years and who was brought here prior to the age of 15 at the time the act was passed, who has completed high school or college in the USA, who has no crime record, are being considered for Amnesty, 5 to 10 years down the road, after the bill had passed.....

These refugees would not even be a part of it.... or any immigration reform that passes in the near future.

so no, it does NOT help the Democrats to have these refugees being hauled up here, with all of this negative publicity....the only people it helps, is the right wing, riling up their base...imo.
 
Last edited:
[youtube]ouiMy73Ouvs[/youtube]​

Republicans always say old black men and women are the most racist people on the planet.

Well... fuck aren't they maybe the only people on the planet with a free pass to be racist? They were literally treated as subhuman for a significant portion of their lives by white people.

LMAO- Justify away all you want. This woman is vile. :eusa_hand:

-Geaux
Was she vile? I couldn't understand a single word she babbled.
 
Out of wedlock births have increased in White folks, too, over the last 50 years, and it's had nothing to do with "socialism".

It has to do with the fact that marriage is not seen as necessary by a lot of people.

It has everything to do with Socialist programs.
And who pushed that message in the 1960's?

Lefty Feminists who hijacked that movement and made it into hate for traditional family values.

have you notice with these republican if they don't walk in step with the republican mandate its they're socialist ... the democrats didn't push feminist, women push it ... the democrats embraced their point of view ...repubicans apposed it ... the fact that you want to keep a woman barefoot and pregnant and the slave to your sexual desires and when they object to your republicans point of view of what a woman should be, you say they are hijacked ... that they are too stupid to make decisions for them selves ... that you feel your belief of what a traditional family value is you have a lot to learn


Where did I mention any parties?
I was part of that movement in the sixties and lefty hate filled feminists hijacked the movement. It went from equality for women to hate for men.
They were very hateful women and very anti men and anti family.
 

Forum List

Back
Top