Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BA's in History and English, Masters in History; I taught damned near everything except math when I was teaching 6-12 in small rural schools, and I taught World and American history at a college, but, did not like working with college kids as much as working with the younger kids.Let's see.Roadrunner, Katzngoz, Kosh, Stephanie -
Posting statements assuring us how intelligent you all are and how stupid everyone else is would seem to go a long way towards establishing my point.
Beyond vague insults and claims to startling insight and intelligence - do any of you ever actually have anything of substance to say?
Do you not think that maybe posting intelligent comments might provide better evidence of actual intelligence?
I have two BA's and a Masters from the University of Texas at Austin, score 98th percentile on the NTE when I took it, taught successfully for 25 years, and retired at 55.
That convinces me I am smarter than the average Dem.
What were your degrees in, what did you teach and at what level?
Is this a serious post?///////////////////Liberal = lying America hating Chinese communist loving socialist puke. Glad I could clear that up for you.
lib·er·al
ˈlib(ə)rəl/tolerant, unprejudiced, unbigoted, broad-minded, open-minded, enlightened;More
permissive, free, free and easy, easygoing, libertarian, indulgent, lenient
"the values of a liberal society"
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
antonyms: narrow-minded, bigoted
- (in a political context) favoring maximum individual liberty in political and social reform.
"a liberal democratic state"
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
synonyms: progressive, advanced, modern, forward-looking, forward-thinking, progressivist, enlightened, reformist, radical
"a liberal social agenda"[TBODY] [/TBODY]
antonyms: reactionary, conservative
- of or characteristic of Liberals or a Liberal Party.
adjective: Liberal
- (in the UK) of or relating to the Liberal Democrat Party.
adjective: Liberal
"the Liberal leader"
- Theology
regarding many traditional beliefs as dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.
- 2.
(of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
synonyms: wide-ranging, broad-based, general
when you have to rely on a googel [sic] dictionary to find definitions that describe yourself and your lying party, you have lost your side of the argument, nowhere in the spelling of Conservative can you find a lie.., BUT!! in the spelling of LIEberal, there is no escaping the fact that liberal can NOT be spelled without a "LIbE"
none of those dictionary definitions fit todays LIEberals..., 100 years or so ago, but NOT today !!!
Ask yourself this question - Are we advancing or falling behind?
Has Liberal entitlement programs lifted the poor out of poverty or has it kept them in poverty?
Is our society breaking down or is it becoming better?
The answer is no to all three.
Social Security and Medicare have lifted MILLIONS of Americans out of poverty. Before Medicare, elderly were the most likely group to fall into poverty, after Medicare elderly are the LEAST likely to live in poverty.
Conservatives have NEVER done anything to help the poor. They loathe the poor.
Let's see.Roadrunner, Katzngoz, Kosh, Stephanie -
Posting statements assuring us how intelligent you all are and how stupid everyone else is would seem to go a long way towards establishing my point.
Beyond vague insults and claims to startling insight and intelligence - do any of you ever actually have anything of substance to say?
Do you not think that maybe posting intelligent comments might provide better evidence of actual intelligence?
I have two BA's and a Masters from the University of Texas at Austin, score 98th percentile on the NTE when I took it, taught successfully for 25 years, and retired at 55.
That convinces me I am smarter than the average Dem.
What were your degrees in, what did you teach and at what level?
BA's in History and English, Masters in History; I taught damned near everything except math when I was teaching 6-12 in small rural schools, and I taught World and American history at a college, but, did not like working with college kids as much as working with the younger kids.Let's see.Roadrunner, Katzngoz, Kosh, Stephanie -
Posting statements assuring us how intelligent you all are and how stupid everyone else is would seem to go a long way towards establishing my point.
Beyond vague insults and claims to startling insight and intelligence - do any of you ever actually have anything of substance to say?
Do you not think that maybe posting intelligent comments might provide better evidence of actual intelligence?
I have two BA's and a Masters from the University of Texas at Austin, score 98th percentile on the NTE when I took it, taught successfully for 25 years, and retired at 55.
That convinces me I am smarter than the average Dem.
What were your degrees in, what did you teach and at what level?
I'm going to pay more attention to what you have to say, then. I'm wondering how someone who actually studied and taught History can be so dedicated to the GOP's stated objectives for this land. And....how someone with so much education can be so enthralled by the term "Gubercrats". It just doesn't make sense to me.
Let's see.Roadrunner, Katzngoz, Kosh, Stephanie -
Posting statements assuring us how intelligent you all are and how stupid everyone else is would seem to go a long way towards establishing my point.
Beyond vague insults and claims to startling insight and intelligence - do any of you ever actually have anything of substance to say?
Do you not think that maybe posting intelligent comments might provide better evidence of actual intelligence?
I have two BA's and a Masters from the University of Texas at Austin, score 98th percentile on the NTE when I took it, taught successfully for 25 years, and retired at 55.
That convinces me I am smarter than the average Dem.
oh wow where is the new testament did hitler get his christian teachings? You will not find them there, so your attempt to defend hitler is shot down.hitler was left winger but careful how you show thanks everybody can see it you partisan hack.Makes no difference because I am smarter than you. That is a fact.Word on the street is liberals are stupid for supporting obamacare by those who helped to create obamacare.
You forgot a couple of words. Without them, what you said makes no sense.
Coming from a person who was claiming last week that Hitler was left wing, I think that is extremely unlikely.
THIS Hitler?
"Today Christians stand at the head of our country. I pledge that I will never tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity... We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit.... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theatre, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past few years."
Adolf Hitler
The Speeches of Adolph Hitler, 1922-1939, Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942), pg. 871-872.
If I said "Gubercrats" I dropped an R due to sticky keys.BA's in History and English, Masters in History; I taught damned near everything except math when I was teaching 6-12 in small rural schools, and I taught World and American history at a college, but, did not like working with college kids as much as working with the younger kids.Let's see.Roadrunner, Katzngoz, Kosh, Stephanie -
Posting statements assuring us how intelligent you all are and how stupid everyone else is would seem to go a long way towards establishing my point.
Beyond vague insults and claims to startling insight and intelligence - do any of you ever actually have anything of substance to say?
Do you not think that maybe posting intelligent comments might provide better evidence of actual intelligence?
I have two BA's and a Masters from the University of Texas at Austin, score 98th percentile on the NTE when I took it, taught successfully for 25 years, and retired at 55.
That convinces me I am smarter than the average Dem.
What were your degrees in, what did you teach and at what level?
I'm going to pay more attention to what you have to say, then. I'm wondering how someone who actually studied and taught History can be so dedicated to the GOP's stated objectives for this land. And....how someone with so much education can be so enthralled by the term "Gubercrats". It just doesn't make sense to me.
Yeah, we get paid all the time.Is this a serious post?///////////////////lib·er·al
ˈlib(ə)rəl/tolerant, unprejudiced, unbigoted, broad-minded, open-minded, enlightened;More
permissive, free, free and easy, easygoing, libertarian, indulgent, lenient
"the values of a liberal society"
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
antonyms: narrow-minded, bigoted
- (in a political context) favoring maximum individual liberty in political and social reform.
"a liberal democratic state"
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
synonyms: progressive, advanced, modern, forward-looking, forward-thinking, progressivist, enlightened, reformist, radical
"a liberal social agenda"[TBODY] [/TBODY]
antonyms: reactionary, conservative
- of or characteristic of Liberals or a Liberal Party.
adjective: Liberal
- (in the UK) of or relating to the Liberal Democrat Party.
adjective: Liberal
"the Liberal leader"
- Theology
regarding many traditional beliefs as dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.
- 2.
(of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
synonyms: wide-ranging, broad-based, general
when you have to rely on a googel [sic] dictionary to find definitions that describe yourself and your lying party, you have lost your side of the argument, nowhere in the spelling of Conservative can you find a lie.., BUT!! in the spelling of LIEberal, there is no escaping the fact that liberal can NOT be spelled without a "LIbE"
none of those dictionary definitions fit todays LIEberals..., 100 years or so ago, but NOT today !!!
Ask yourself this question - Are we advancing or falling behind?
Has Liberal entitlement programs lifted the poor out of poverty or has it kept them in poverty?
Is our society breaking down or is it becoming better?
The answer is no to all three.
Social Security and Medicare have lifted MILLIONS of Americans out of poverty. Before Medicare, elderly were the most likely group to fall into poverty, after Medicare elderly are the LEAST likely to live in poverty.
Conservatives have NEVER done anything to help the poor. They loathe the poor.
More proof that the far left drones will post whatever their rich white far left owners tell them think..
Ask yourself this question - Are we advancing or falling behind?
Has Liberal entitlement programs lifted the poor out of poverty or has it kept them in poverty?
Is our society breaking down or is it becoming better?
The answer is no to all three.
What's the matter? You don't like living in a society of the haves and have nots? Why not?
Are we advancing you ask. Well the very rich and the ultra rich are "advancing" just fine. What is the problem?
The declining standard of living for lots of folks is just the outcome of a lack of good paying jobs. Not to worry. Their lack of disposable income will have no effect on the very very rich that run the country. So what is the problem?
My wife and I find ourselves in the upper 10% of income numbers and things are fine with us.
What is YOUR problem? The rest of us with some money are doing fine.
Did you lose your good paying job?
The libs took over 40 years ago and the middle class has been declining ever since.
That is a fact not an opinion.
Liberal stupidity is connected with support of obama and obamacare
I won't even bother with defending an institution that stands on its own reputation.Let's see.Roadrunner, Katzngoz, Kosh, Stephanie -
Posting statements assuring us how intelligent you all are and how stupid everyone else is would seem to go a long way towards establishing my point.
Beyond vague insults and claims to startling insight and intelligence - do any of you ever actually have anything of substance to say?
Do you not think that maybe posting intelligent comments might provide better evidence of actual intelligence?
I have two BA's and a Masters from the University of Texas at Austin, score 98th percentile on the NTE when I took it, taught successfully for 25 years, and retired at 55.
That convinces me I am smarter than the average Dem.
Texas?
//////////////
that is amazing ! where have you been hiding ? oooooooooh ! i get it now, the fact is you just do not know a true blue liberfuck, there are quite a few here on this forum, try to get to know a few, i could recommend some, but they stand out like a car on fire in a crowded parking lot at a night time football game...............
I think this post proves the point of this thread very well.
Don't be to hard on them. I am guilty of calling these asshole Republicans stupid. And of course, I can PROVE they are stupid. Hell, look at the use of language, sentence structure and the ability too make a coherent point and you start figuring out quickly that some of these Republican poster are really fucking stupid.
For example; there is a group of posters that repeatedly claim that demand for a product or service does not create jobs to fill that demand. Rabbit is the worst to make that claim but there are many others.
And that's just fucking stupid. And you can't argue, find common ground or do anything else with that level of stupidity. Except call them names. Which I do every day.
I sure would like to engage with a smart republican. Do you know any?
Ask yourself this question - Are we advancing or falling behind?
Has Liberal entitlement programs lifted the poor out of poverty or has it kept them in poverty?
Is our society breaking down or is it becoming better?
The answer is no to all three.
What's the matter? You don't like living in a society of the haves and have nots? Why not?
Are we advancing you ask. Well the very rich and the ultra rich are "advancing" just fine. What is the problem?
The declining standard of living for lots of folks is just the outcome of a lack of good paying jobs. Not to worry. Their lack of disposable income will have no effect on the very very rich that run the country. So what is the problem?
My wife and I find ourselves in the upper 10% of income numbers and things are fine with us.
What is YOUR problem? The rest of us with some money are doing fine.
Did you lose your good paying job?
The libs took over 40 years ago and the middle class has been declining ever since.
That is a fact not an opinion.
Are you serious? The liberal era which began with the New Deal and ended with the Great Society saw the largest growth of the middle class in our history. The conservative era began 40 years ago.
Yeah, we get paid all the time.Is this a serious post?///////////////////
when you have to rely on a googel [sic] dictionary to find definitions that describe yourself and your lying party, you have lost your side of the argument, nowhere in the spelling of Conservative can you find a lie.., BUT!! in the spelling of LIEberal, there is no escaping the fact that liberal can NOT be spelled without a "LIbE"
none of those dictionary definitions fit todays LIEberals..., 100 years or so ago, but NOT today !!!
Ask yourself this question - Are we advancing or falling behind?
Has Liberal entitlement programs lifted the poor out of poverty or has it kept them in poverty?
Is our society breaking down or is it becoming better?
The answer is no to all three.
Social Security and Medicare have lifted MILLIONS of Americans out of poverty. Before Medicare, elderly were the most likely group to fall into poverty, after Medicare elderly are the LEAST likely to live in poverty.
Conservatives have NEVER done anything to help the poor. They loathe the poor.
More proof that the far left drones will post whatever their rich white far left owners tell them think..
Good point.
I think some people ran off when asked to state THEIR degrees and careers.Ask yourself this question - Are we advancing or falling behind?
Has Liberal entitlement programs lifted the poor out of poverty or has it kept them in poverty?
Is our society breaking down or is it becoming better?
The answer is no to all three.
What's the matter? You don't like living in a society of the haves and have nots? Why not?
Are we advancing you ask. Well the very rich and the ultra rich are "advancing" just fine. What is the problem?
The declining standard of living for lots of folks is just the outcome of a lack of good paying jobs. Not to worry. Their lack of disposable income will have no effect on the very very rich that run the country. So what is the problem?
My wife and I find ourselves in the upper 10% of income numbers and things are fine with us.
What is YOUR problem? The rest of us with some money are doing fine.
Did you lose your good paying job?
The libs took over 40 years ago and the middle class has been declining ever since.
That is a fact not an opinion.
Are you serious? The liberal era which began with the New Deal and ended with the Great Society saw the largest growth of the middle class in our history. The conservative era began 40 years ago.
do you people ever get tired of spewing the line? it's so pathetic
Kosh -
There really are no "far left" posters on this board that I have seen, which is why I never understand your obsession with them, but I do agree with you that probably many liberal posters don't understand conservatism as well as they should do, and visa versa.
The terms 'Liberal' and 'far left' have very, very little in common, btw. They are closer to being opposites than synonyms; hence your posts are often rendered meaningless when you confuse the two.
Was there a demand for pet rocks or hula hoops?
Yet they created jobs.
Why do you always say 'far left'?Kosh -
There really are no "far left" posters on this board that I have seen, which is why I never understand your obsession with them, but I do agree with you that probably many liberal posters don't understand conservatism as well as they should do, and visa versa.
The terms 'Liberal' and 'far left' have very, very little in common, btw. They are closer to being opposites than synonyms; hence your posts are often rendered meaningless when you confuse the two.
And that proves how far to the left you are as I pointed out when you first started spouting that you were "right wing"..
Now the far left wants to lecture others on how the far left are not "liberals". A point that has been known for a very long time. Just that the far left hijacked that term to hide themselves like the OP has..
Please point out where I have confused those terms!
Good luck!
