Are gag orders constitutional?

[berg80]

Where did the supreme court get that power? I dont remember that being in the enumerated powers of the constitution.

So.......you're going with obtuse. Good choice and one you are intimately familiar with.

 

[TNHarley]

Why is this discussion still going on. The answer to the question....

Are gag orders constitutional?​

is unequivocally yes.


Some view gag orders as violations of a person’s First Amendment rights, while others consider it helpful in ensuring a fair trial. The Supreme Court previously ruled that a gag order is constitutional if it can protect the right to a fair trial, is as least restrictive as possible, and will be effective, Yale Law School explains.

What is a gag order — and what happens if the gag order is violated?​

A federal judge imposed a gag order against Trump on Monday — but what is it, and what happens if he violates it?

thehill.com

Show me in the constitution where it says the govt has the ability to pause someones constitutional rights for talking.

 

[kaz]

Where did the supreme court get that power? I dont remember that being in the enumerated powers of the constitution.

berg80 and the Democrats know what they are doing wrong trying to put their political opponent in prison and want to hide what they are doing. There is no mystery here

 

[jc456]

Why is this discussion still going on. The answer to the question....

Are gag orders constitutional?​

is unequivocally yes.


Some view gag orders as violations of a person’s First Amendment rights, while others consider it helpful in ensuring a fair trial. The Supreme Court previously ruled that a gag order is constitutional if it can protect the right to a fair trial, is as least restrictive as possible, and will be effective, Yale Law School explains.

What is a gag order — and what happens if the gag order is violated?​

A federal judge imposed a gag order against Trump on Monday — but what is it, and what happens if he violates it?

thehill.com

Cause you say so? You think that’s standing? Hahaha

 

[TNHarley]

So.......you're going with obtuse. Good choice and one you are intimately familiar with.

Yep, cant show me that can you? That would be because it doesnt exist.
Boot lickers love the govt creating power out of thin air. Blows my mind.

 

[kaz]

So.......you're going with obtuse. Good choice and one you are intimately familiar with.

Who did Trump threaten? Democrats keep parroting you can silence Trump because he's threatening people but can't name them

 

[schmidlap]

It’s illegal. Why would it go to a higher court?

It is the legal recourse if a citizen challenges a court ruling.

 

[berg80]

That is all already illegal!

If those things were all illegal Trump would be serving time already.

 

[berg80]

Who did Trump threaten?

Try putting that is a search window and you'll have your answer.

 

[berg80]

Show me in the constitution where it says the govt has the ability to pause someones constitutional rights for talking.

So it's back to being obtuse. Chutkan has already explained in detail what constitutes permissible, protected speech for a defendant to engage in and what is not protected. Didn't I already explain to you the Constitution does not specifically address the scope of all rights and that's where the courts step in. I suggest you do some reading on enumerated and unenumerated rights.
Or, you could accept the couple of posts I've written which show the SC has already ruled gag orders to be constitutional. Cuz at this point it really looks like you're doing this.........

 

[WinterBorn]

Not in a free country, no. Statists like you and the Democrats hide your crimes in darkness though

Crimes? Like not allowing people to discuss who the witnesses are and who they can intimidate or threaten?

 

[jc456]

It is the legal recourse if a citizen challenges a court ruling.

Murdoch’s didn’t!

 

[dudmuck]

Not in a free country, no. Statists like you and the Democrats hide your crimes in darkness though

 

[TNHarley]

So it's back to being obtuse. Chutkan has already explained in detail what constitutes permissible, protected speech for a defendant to engage in and what is not protected. Didn't I already explain to you the Constitution does not specifically address the scope of all rights and that's where the courts step in. I suggest you do some reading on enumerated and unenumerated rights.
Or, you could accept the couple of posts I've written which show the SC has already ruled gag orders to be constitutional. Cuz at this point it really looks like you're doing this.........

IDC what that judge says. IDC what any judge says.
The SC also ruled throwing citizens in internment camps was fine. Remember that? Or remember when they ruled Jim Crow laws were constitutional? Or remember when they said it was constitutional to make gay sex illegal? Or how long a bakery can stay open?

 

[kaz]

Try putting that is a search window and you'll have your answer.

The whole point is I want you to name them so you own it. My God leftists are morons

 

[kaz]

Crimes? Like not allowing people to discuss who the witnesses are and who they can intimidate or threaten?

I keep asking Democrats that and you keep running away and hiding.

So name them, dumb ass, and stop hiding and demanding your political enemies the Republicans get shut down because someone did something and you can't name either, Democrat scum

 

[Care4all]

 

[kaz]

You still can't name these people Trump "threatened," none of you can

 

[Care4all]

I keep asking Democrats that and you keep running away and hiding.

So name them, dumb ass, and stop hiding and demanding your political enemies the Republicans get shut down because someone did something and you can't name either, Democrat scum

The judicial asst,

Michael Cohen

Bill Barr

Gen Miley

 

[WEATHER53]

Who did Trump threaten? Democrats keep parroting you can silence Trump because he's threatening people but can't name them

No one
He belittled a clerk of the persecution wing and that’s a Big Feelings No No