Are the anti-science zealots accepting anthropogenic climate change yet?

[abu afak]

so many clowns, new and old here, say it's all natural
"it goes up, it goes down"
but scientists have actually looked into WHY this cycle is different than the others.

About 615,000,000 results (0.30 seconds)
Search Results
Web results

How We Know Today's Climate Change Is Not Natural
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2017/04/.../how-we-know-climate-change-is-not-natural/Apr 4, 2017 - Last week, the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, chaired by climate contrarian Lamar Smith, R-Texas, held a hearing on ...

How do we know global warming is not a natural cycle? | Climate ...
www.climatecentral.org/library/faqs/how_do_we_know_it_is_not_a_natural_cycleNov 7, 2009 - Answer. If the Earth's temperature had been steady for millions of years and only started rising in the past half century or so, the answer would ...

How do we know? - Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of ...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. ...Not only was 2016 the warmest year on record, but eight of the 12 months that make up .... the Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the ...

Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htmHowever, internal forces do not cause climate change. ... and oceanic emissions of CO2 and know that they are small compared to anthropogenic emissions, but ...
[.....]
How Do We Know Humans Are Causing Climate Change? | Climate ...
https://www.climaterealityproject.org/.../how-do-we-know-humans-are-causing-climat...Feb 1, 2019 - Yes, we know humans are responsible for the climate changewe see ... as if we're wrapping another, not-so-natural blanket around the Earth.

Global warming isn't just a natural cycle » Yale Climate Connections
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/.../global-warming-isnt-just-a-natural-cycle/Sep 18, 2018 - Here's how we know that. ... Global warming isn't just anatural cycle. By Sara Peach on Sep ... The earth's temperature changesnaturally over time. Variations ... Earth's warming: How scientists know it'snot the sun. From Yale ...

How Do We Know that Humans Are the Major Cause of Global ...
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science.../human-contribution-to-gw-faq.htmlJump to Natural and human factors that influence the climate (known as ...- Natural climate drivers include the energy ... in snow and ice cover thatchange how much ... if it were not for these human-made and natural tiny particles.

[.....]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

so many clowns, new and old here, say it's all natural
"it goes up, it goes down"
but scientists have actually looked into WHY this cycle is different than the others.

About 615,000,000 results (0.30 seconds)
Search Results
Web results

How We Know Today's Climate Change Is Not Natural
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2017/04/.../how-we-know-climate-change-is-not-natural/Apr 4, 2017 - Last week, the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, chaired by climate contrarian Lamar Smith, R-Texas, held a hearing on ...

How do we know global warming is not a natural cycle? | Climate ...
www.climatecentral.org/library/faqs/how_do_we_know_it_is_not_a_natural_cycleNov 7, 2009 - Answer. If the Earth's temperature had been steady for millions of years and only started rising in the past half century or so, the answer would ...

How do we know? - Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of ...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. ...Not only was 2016 the warmest year on record, but eight of the 12 months that make up .... the Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the ...

Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htmHowever, internal forces do not cause climate change. ... and oceanic emissions of CO2 and know that they are small compared to anthropogenic emissions, but ...
[.....]
How Do We Know Humans Are Causing Climate Change? | Climate ...
https://www.climaterealityproject.org/.../how-do-we-know-humans-are-causing-climat...Feb 1, 2019 - Yes, we know humans are responsible for the climate changewe see ... as if we're wrapping another, not-so-natural blanket around the Earth.

Global warming isn't just a natural cycle » Yale Climate Connections
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/.../global-warming-isnt-just-a-natural-cycle/Sep 18, 2018 - Here's how we know that. ... Global warming isn't just anatural cycle. By Sara Peach on Sep ... The earth's temperature changesnaturally over time. Variations ... Earth's warming: How scientists know it'snot the sun. From Yale ...

How Do We Know that Humans Are the Major Cause of Global ...
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science.../human-contribution-to-gw-faq.htmlJump to Natural and human factors that influence the climate (known as ...- Natural climate drivers include the energy ... in snow and ice cover thatchange how much ... if it were not for these human-made and natural tiny particles.

[.....]
`

Cobb: “What we see clearly is that the rate and the magnitude of current warming really dwarfs anything in this most recent geologic period.”

Really? What are the three quickest and largest warming periods besides this one, "in this most recent geologic period”?

She says that the current concentration of global warming pollution in the atmosphere is the only factor that explains it.

Global warming pollution?
Georgia Tech used to be more serious, now they'll let any idiot claim to be a climate scientist

 

[EMH]

Warmer oceans hold less co2 in relation to the atmospheric concentration. The Milankovitch cycles starts the warming first. This causes the oceans to release CO2 thus temperature leads CO2. But this starts a feedback loop with CO2 caused greenhouse effect helping to raise temperatures. Thus the world comes out of glacier periods faster than it goes into them.

People who cannot handle multiple simultaneous variables but think they have clues are hilariously annoying.

During the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. The mcBULLSHIT cycles do not explain that truth. How did co2 melt NA and freeze Greenland at the same time?

 

[psikeyhackr]

During the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. The mcBULLSHIT cycles do not explain that truth. How did co2 melt NA and freeze Greenland at the same time?

During which of these cycles did this alleged phenomenon occur? Care to provide a link to the source where some scientist let you know about this?

Do you know where Greenland is?

 

[EMH]

View attachment 711689
During which of these cycles did this alleged phenomenon occur? Care to provide a link to the source where some scientist let you know about this?

Color fudge charts and parroting only, please....


Or you could get a clue yourself by search for


North American ice age

(Notice a CONTINENT SPECIFIC ICE AGE too)

And

Ancient Greenland green


There is even a real explanation.

NA tectonic plate moving SW

Angle of fault in North Atlantic pushing Greenland NW


NA moved south and thawed

Greenland moved north and froze


But but but where is a climate "scientist" to parrot????


Bawk on, moron

 

[EMH]

Seems anti-science zealots are not accepting anthropogenic climate change yet.

Like 911, it takes an IQ over 5 to see through the co2 fraud.

 

[Crick]

Like 911, it takes an IQ over 5 to see through the co2 fraud.

You must have put up over a dozen posts on this forum rejecting AGW. But, despite the many opportunities and the requests from those with whom you 'debate' you've yet to post a single link to an outside reference. All we ever get from you is your unsupported opinions and your insults. I believe that makes you a troll.

 

[jc456]

They "conserve" only short term profits. "Hell, The Rapture is coming soon anyway.. Save the fetus! Screw the grandchildren!"

isn't the fetus a grandchild?

 

[jc456]

You must have put up over a dozen posts on this forum rejecting AGW. But, despite the many opportunities and the requests from those with whom you 'debate' you've yet to post a single link to an outside reference. All we ever get from you is your unsupported opinions and your insults. I believe that makes you a troll.

Again, ole Crick, I'll ask you here since you still haven't answered, but it is relevant to your statement here, what is the temperature of 120 PPM of CO2?

Where's your science?

 

[EMH]

You must have put up over a dozen posts on this forum rejecting AGW. But, despite the many opportunities and the requests from those with whom you 'debate' you've yet to post a single link to an outside reference. All we ever get from you is your unsupported opinions and your insults. I believe that makes you a troll.

How many cat 5 storms have hit Martha's Vineyard with 180 mph winds since 1938?

Answer ZERO


Your side has fudge, lies, and online parroting imbeciles like yourself. It has no TRUTH.

 

[Crick]

How many cat 5 storms have hit Martha's Vineyard with 180 mph winds since 1938?

Answer ZERO


Your side has fudge, lies, and online parroting imbeciles like yourself. It has no TRUTH.

How old are you?

 

[EMH]

How old are you?

Old enough to notice the following


Your side says oceans are warming
Raw data never showed that, your "warming" is all fudge
Warming oceans should produce more and bigger canes
Data shows no such breakout in cane activity
When asked whether any cat 5 has gotten as far north as the '38 cane did, you cowardly change the subject because the true answer refutes your

PARROTED BULLSHIT

 

[ding]

You must have put up over a dozen posts on this forum rejecting AGW. But, despite the many opportunities and the requests from those with whom you 'debate' you've yet to post a single link to an outside reference. All we ever get from you is your unsupported opinions and your insults. I believe that makes you a troll.

You need a link to know that warming naturally occurs during interglacial cycles?

 

[Crick]

You need a link to know that warming naturally occurs during interglacial cycles?

Perhaps you should try talking to poster EMH. That's who I was addressing and he claims there's no warming going on from any cause.

 

[psikeyhackr]

Again, ole Crick, I'll ask you here since you still haven't answered, but it is relevant to your statement here, what is the temperature of 120 PPM of CO2?

Where's your science?

I am not aware of atmospheric CO2 getting that low in the last 50 million years. Before that land masses were in different locations resulting in different ocean and wind currents meaning the question is pointless.

The variable you are asking about cannot be tested in isolation.

 

[Grumblenuts]

The variable you are asking about cannot be tested in isolation.

A constant, more likely. As though one could convert concentration (parts per million of CO2) to temperature (degrees Centigrade, Kelvin, or whatever) with a silly fudge factor.

 

[jc456]

I am not aware of atmospheric CO2 getting that low in the last 50 million years. Before that land masses were in different locations resulting in different ocean and wind currents meaning the question is pointless.

The variable you are asking about cannot be tested in isolation.

The point is, if you don’t know the temperature of the amount of CO2 being added, how do you know it affects temperature?

That’s no science

 

[Crick]

The point is, if you don’t know the temperature of the amount of CO2 being added, how do you know it affects temperature?

That’s no science

The radiative forcing diagram from AR6's Technical Summary of "The Physical Science Basis" indicates that the CO2 added since 1750 - by itself - has produced approximately 1 centigrade degree of warming. See my last post in the radiative physics thread.

Happy?

Now what will you do? I think you should spend a lot more time playing with your grandchildren.

 

[Crick]

Here you go.

 

[jc456]

The radiative forcing diagram from AR6's Technical Summary of "The Physical Science Basis" indicates that the CO2 added since 1750 - by itself - has produced approximately 1 centigrade degree of warming. See my last post in the radiative physics thread.

Happy?

Now what will you do? I think you should spend a lot more time playing with your grandchildren.

33.8 degrees f? Bull