Are The FISA Judges Corrupt?

Should the FISA judge be expected to know when the DOJ fails to produce all relevant information to the court? Anybody know what the law says about a situation where a FISA request deliberately left out relevant data or failed to specify the sources and the vetting for that information? Which may or may not be the case here, I would rather see the documents provided to the court before deciding who lied, omitted, or misrepresented anything.
______________

It is mostly on the lawyer, but if Obama appointed the Judge, one could reasonably expect a co-conspiracy. They will be taking the same orders from the same Marxist.
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.
 
Page warrants ended in 2015 without charges or evidence to continue and two attempts later to regain it in 2016 failed before the dossier was used to regain it. Epic fail!

It was the Papadapoulos information that triggered the FISA warrant.

Not according to the FISA court.. The Senate Judiciary committee has shown that lie for what it is.

The Schiff memo, which Trump won't release, proves you wrong.
 
Simple question
Simple discussion

We know The FBI and DOJ knowingly filed False Affidavits and hid Exculpatory Evidence, knowing that The Dossier was Russian and Clinton Campaign Sourced and Financed.

The FBI & DOJ also knowingly tried to deceive The FISA Judge by concealing the circular reporting they used to falsely give the Fake Dossier The Appearance of Corroboration.

There can only be two things here that are true then.

1.) The FISA Judge is incompetent, was deceived and is negligent in his duty to cite those responsible with crimes against The FISA Court.

2.) The FISA Judge is Corrupt and was an active participant in The Russian Hoax and FISA Abuse!

no nutbar, they are not corrupt. your orange sociopath is.
 
Page warrants ended in 2015 without charges or evidence to continue and two attempts later to regain it in 2016 failed before the dossier was used to regain it. Epic fail!

It was the Papadapoulos information that triggered the FISA warrant.

Not according to the FISA court.. The Senate Judiciary committee has shown that lie for what it is.

The Schiff memo, which Trump won't release, proves you wrong.
Nope!

Your going to be severely butt hurt when it comes out and it doesn't prove you're assertions.
 
Should the FISA judge be expected to know when the DOJ fails to produce all relevant information to the court? Anybody know what the law says about a situation where a FISA request deliberately left out relevant data or failed to specify the sources and the vetting for that information? Which may or may not be the case here, I would rather see the documents provided to the court before deciding who lied, omitted, or misrepresented anything.
______________

It is mostly on the lawyer, but if Obama appointed the Judge, one could reasonably expect a co-conspiracy. They will be taking the same orders from the same Marxist.
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.
The Safe assumption is that if they were appointed by Obama, they are as corrupt as Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, Loretta Lunch, Susan Rice, James Clapper, John Brennan, Valerie Jarrett, and Hillary Clinton.
Page warrants ended in 2015 without charges or evidence to continue and two attempts later to regain it in 2016 failed before the dossier was used to regain it. Epic fail!

It was the Papadapoulos information that triggered the FISA warrant.

Not according to the FISA court.. The Senate Judiciary committee has shown that lie for what it is.

The Schiff memo, which Trump won't release, proves you wrong.

that is false. carter page was under surveillance because he was being groomed by Russian spies as an asset.
the GOP congress just renewed the laws pertaining to FISA. if there was a problem, which there isn't, why would they do that.

hint: no problem... lying loony trumptards.
 
Should the FISA judge be expected to know when the DOJ fails to produce all relevant information to the court? Anybody know what the law says about a situation where a FISA request deliberately left out relevant data or failed to specify the sources and the vetting for that information? Which may or may not be the case here, I would rather see the documents provided to the court before deciding who lied, omitted, or misrepresented anything.
______________

It is mostly on the lawyer, but if Obama appointed the Judge, one could reasonably expect a co-conspiracy. They will be taking the same orders from the same Marxist.
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.
The Safe assumption is that if they were appointed by Obama, they are as corrupt as Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, Loretta Lunch, Susan Rice, James Clapper, John Brennan, Valerie Jarrett, and Hillary Clinton.
Page warrants ended in 2015 without charges or evidence to continue and two attempts later to regain it in 2016 failed before the dossier was used to regain it. Epic fail!

It was the Papadapoulos information that triggered the FISA warrant.

Not according to the FISA court.. The Senate Judiciary committee has shown that lie for what it is.

The Schiff memo, which Trump won't release, proves you wrong.

that is false. carter page was under surveillance because he was being groomed by Russian spies as an asset.
the GOP congress just renewed the laws pertaining to FISA. if there was a problem, which there isn't, why would they do that.

hint: no problem... lying loony trumptards.
Poor SiIly Jilly

You really should stop watchin CNN fake news..
 
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review - Wikipedia

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is aU.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants (called FISA warrants) by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC).

The judges of the Court of Review are district or appellate federal judges, appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States for seven-year terms.

John Glover Roberts Jr. (born January 27, 1955) is the 17th and current Chief Justice of the United States on the Supreme Court of the United States. He took his seat on September 29, 2005

By 2013 every judge on the FISCR was appointed by Roberts.
 
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review - Wikipedia

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is aU.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants (called FISA warrants) by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC).

The judges of the Court of Review are district or appellate federal judges, appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States for seven-year terms.

John Glover Roberts Jr. (born January 27, 1955) is the 17th and current Chief Justice of the United States on the Supreme Court of the United States. He took his seat on September 29, 2005

By 2013 every judge on the FISCR was appointed by Roberts.
And he can fire them as well..
 
Should the FISA judge be expected to know when the DOJ fails to produce all relevant information to the court? Anybody know what the law says about a situation where a FISA request deliberately left out relevant data or failed to specify the sources and the vetting for that information? Which may or may not be the case here, I would rather see the documents provided to the court before deciding who lied, omitted, or misrepresented anything.
______________

It is mostly on the lawyer, but if Obama appointed the Judge, one could reasonably expect a co-conspiracy. They will be taking the same orders from the same Marxist.
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.
The Safe assumption is that if they were appointed by Obama, they are as corrupt as Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, Loretta Lunch, Susan Rice, James Clapper, John Brennan, Valerie Jarrett, and Hillary Clinton.
Page warrants ended in 2015 without charges or evidence to continue and two attempts later to regain it in 2016 failed before the dossier was used to regain it. Epic fail!

It was the Papadapoulos information that triggered the FISA warrant.

Not according to the FISA court.. The Senate Judiciary committee has shown that lie for what it is.

The Schiff memo, which Trump won't release, proves you wrong.

that is false. carter page was under surveillance because he was being groomed by Russian spies as an asset.
the GOP congress just renewed the laws pertaining to FISA. if there was a problem, which there isn't, why would they do that.

hint: no problem... lying loony trumptards.

Carter Page may have been approached by Russian agents to become an asset to them, but there's no evidence at all to suggest that he accepted or ever was a Russian agent. If there was, where are the indictments and charges? Hence, your assertion that he was being 'groomed' is BS. Page was surveilled because he was connected to the Trump campaign, and the democrats wanted to dig up s much dirt as they could to help Hillary win the election. It has yet to be proved, but it really looks like the democrats in the FBI/DOJ used their positions for political purposes. Which is one reason why so many if them are out of that job right now.
 
The judges who preside over America's secret court

While U.S. intelligence officials have insisted that the FISA process is thorough, little attention has focused on the judges themselves.

Selected by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, FISA judges serve for staggered seven-year terms. Although the court carries 11 judges at a time, 14 have served this year because of routine turnover.

Six of the 14 were originally appointed to the trial courts by George W. Bush; five by Ronald Reagan; two by Clinton and one by George H. W. Bush.

“Since FISA was enacted in 1978, we’ve had three chief justices, and they have all been conservative Republicans,
 
I believe John Brennan was also involved in the shenanigans.
Should the FISA judge be expected to know when the DOJ fails to produce all relevant information to the court? Anybody know what the law says about a situation where a FISA request deliberately left out relevant data or failed to specify the sources and the vetting for that information? Which may or may not be the case here, I would rather see the documents provided to the court before deciding who lied, omitted, or misrepresented anything.
______________

It is mostly on the lawyer, but if Obama appointed the Judge, one could reasonably expect a co-conspiracy. They will be taking the same orders from the same Marxist.
Obama didn't appoint any judges to the FISC. They were all appointed by Chief Justice Roberts.
The Safe assumption is that if they were appointed by Obama, they are as corrupt as Eric Holder, Lois Lerner, Loretta Lunch, Susan Rice, James Clapper, John Brennan, Valerie Jarrett, and Hillary Clinton.
Page warrants ended in 2015 without charges or evidence to continue and two attempts later to regain it in 2016 failed before the dossier was used to regain it. Epic fail!

It was the Papadapoulos information that triggered the FISA warrant.

Not according to the FISA court.. The Senate Judiciary committee has shown that lie for what it is.

The Schiff memo, which Trump won't release, proves you wrong.

that is false. carter page was under surveillance because he was being groomed by Russian spies as an asset.
the GOP congress just renewed the laws pertaining to FISA. if there was a problem, which there isn't, why would they do that.

hint: no problem... lying loony trumptards.

Carter Page may have been approached by Russian agents to become an asset to them, but there's no evidence at all to suggest that he accepted or ever was a Russian agent. If there was, where are the indictments and charges? Hence, your assertion that he was being 'groomed' is BS. Page was surveilled because he was connected to the Trump campaign, and the democrats wanted to dig up s much dirt as they could to help Hillary win the election. It has yet to be proved, but it really looks like the democrats in the FBI/DOJ used their positions for political purposes. Which is one reason why so many if them are out of that job right now.
 
The judges who preside over America's secret court

While U.S. intelligence officials have insisted that the FISA process is thorough, little attention has focused on the judges themselves.

Selected by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, FISA judges serve for staggered seven-year terms. Although the court carries 11 judges at a time, 14 have served this year because of routine turnover.

Six of the 14 were originally appointed to the trial courts by George W. Bush; five by Ronald Reagan; two by Clinton and one by George H. W. Bush.

“Since FISA was enacted in 1978, we’ve had three chief justices, and they have all been conservative Republicans,
Its funny how your trying to blame republicans for those who are supposed to be neutral becoming corrupt. It's like telling someone who hires a person they are responsible for the employee's behavior 10 years later.. Corruption happens and after the previous regimes eight years of buying political favors of the Obama Clinton flavor, nothing now surprises me.
 
“Since FISA was enacted in 1978, we’ve had three chief justices, and they have all been conservative Republicans,
Its funny how your trying to blame republicans for those who are supposed to be neutral becoming corrupt. It's like telling someone who hires a person they are responsible for the employee's behavior 10 years later.. Corruption happens and after the previous regimes eight years of buying political favors of the Obama Clinton flavor, nothing now surprises me.

You attack a court that is composed of justices. all of them chosen by a republican chief justice.
 
Someone is gonna do it. With or without "warrants".. The warrants are too weak as they are. Because to tap the Trump campaign and virtually ALL of its players -- the Dems only needed to make the case for ONE of them. So they chose Page.. ANYONE 3 degrees removed from the target can then be surveilled. This needs a LOT more definition and Civil Liberty protection...
Page has been under investigation since 2013.

This isn't a case of the FBI spying on Trump through Page, it's Trump taking somebody into his campaign who was under FBI investigation. And then doing it again, and again and again.

Of course it was a plan to spy on the opposition campaign.. Page was COOPERATING with the FBI since 2013.. They were watching to WARN him of potential attempts to control him. That's why he was never charged with anything. Doing BUSINESS with Russia or TALKING to Russians, or TRAVELING to Russia is not illegal if it's done by the rules..

A lot of ex Intel and security higher-ups have contracts and association with ex - Russian Intel and security guys. This is not unusual at all...
 
Simple question
Simple discussion

We know The FBI and DOJ knowingly filed False Affidavits and hid Exculpatory Evidence, knowing that The Dossier was Russian and Clinton Campaign Sourced and Financed.

The FBI & DOJ also knowingly tried to deceive The FISA Judge by concealing the circular reporting they used to falsely give the Fake Dossier The Appearance of Corroboration.

There can only be two things here that are true then.

1.) The FISA Judge is incompetent, was deceived and is negligent in his duty to cite those responsible with crimes against The FISA Court.

2.) The FISA Judge is Corrupt and was an active participant in The Russian Hoax and FISA Abuse!


only two ways

either the judge(s) was in on it

or

they had the wool pulled over their eyes
 

Forum List

Back
Top