Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,205
- 2,320
Why U.S. Just Ordered Non-Emergency Employees to Leave Iraq Embassy
Sure seems like a preamble.
Why does every single president get us into wars? The timing is very suspicious imo
Maybe Jimmy The Peanut should have thought-through his cowardly reaction when a former Ally, The Shah of Iran, was overthrown and persecuted by the Assahollahs in Iran.
Totally on that scumbag. Totally. May he rot in Hell for all eternity......
What dimocrap scum put the Shah through is an embarrassment to this Country.
But, dimocrap scum being the scum they are, will take the side of people (IRGC) who single out and target innocent young women like Neda who was just marching in the street in support of her fellow citizens.
![]()
![]()
You also might want to ask, "Where was the total scumbag and COWARD, obama, when we had the chance to help Iran's people overthrow a Totalitarian theocracy"?
Go ahead...... Ask.
dimocraps are the scum of the Earth
We don't need a war of choice, we need to go to the streets for a good old fashion protest, and let the members of congress know we the people will not support Trump's Wag the Dog crisis.
Those who do not remember how the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution worked out - 58,000 American Troops died way to earlier - need to write their member of Congress and demand they control Trump's War by invoking The War Powers Act: The War Powers Resolution was passed in 1973 by both Houses of Congress, overriding the veto of President Nixon. It was passed to reassert Congressional authority over the decision to send American troops to war.
Another reason not to commit troops. Air power can do it from a distance. No commitment to a combat zone. The WPA would not apply.
Explain how the WP Resolution does not apply.
BTW, a very interesting read
:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas...arrier_Hendrix_FINAL.pdf?mtime=20160906080533
From the LINK:
"The queen of the American fleet, and the centerpiece of the most powerful Navy the world has ever seen, the aircraft carrier, is in danger of becoming like the battleships it was originally designed to support: big, expensive, vulnerable – and surprisingly irrelevant to the conflicts of the time."
A book by a Navy Capt with a Ph.d who ought to be the Sect. of Defense, who takes a look at the cost-benfits and cost-deficits which the current DOD seems to ignore.
The constitution specifically states that Congress is authorized "to provide and maintain a Navy" (Article 1 Section 8). The idea of "maintenance" of a Navy implies that Naval Forces would be a permanent fixture of national defense. Two types of Land Forces are described by the Constitution (Article 1 Section 8): the Militia (armed citizenry organized into local defense forces and state volunteer regiments) which Congress can "call forth" and prescribe the "organizing, arming, and disciplining [training]" of, as Congress did in the Militia acts of 1792; and the Army, which Congress can "raise and support", through regular appropriation acts limited to no more than two years. This division matches how the Revolutionary War was fought, by the Continental Army, raised and supported by the Continental Congress, and local Militias and Volunteer Regiments, raised by the separate Colonies. After the war, under the Articles of Confederation, a small standing Army, the First American Regiment was raised and gradually increased in size over time by Congress before, following the Constitution's ratification, being transformed into the Regular Army. The availability of a standing Army, and the President of the United States being authorized as "Commander in Chief", implies his ability as a military commander to employ forces necessary to fulfill his oath to defend the constitution.