bdtex
Diamond Member
- Jun 9, 2013
- 1,665
- 1,368
- 1,928
The accuser has the burden of proof too.You made an assertion that you don't support, got called out, and now are unhappy you were called out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The accuser has the burden of proof too.You made an assertion that you don't support, got called out, and now are unhappy you were called out.
I want you to stop giving your assertions as if they mean anything by themselves, and start giving some actual support for your claims.
The accuser has the burden of proof too.You made an assertion that you don't support, got called out, and now are unhappy you were called out.
Not how it works. The OP has to provide factual support, THEN the opponent can do the same. Any burden of proof proponents who asserts then demands fact-based rebuttal does not understand how this works.The accuser has the burden of proof too.You made an assertion that you don't support, got called out, and now are unhappy you were called out.
You have to give facts support for your assertions, kaz, before they can be fact rebutted. It's how it works.That you and bd tex between you can't think of any counter examples to that Democrats agree on every significant issue is the most clearly you could support what I said. That you wouldn't want to prove me wrong with how easily you claim you can do that is deafeningI want you to stop giving your assertions as if they mean anything by themselves, and start giving some actual support for your claims.
You both sound very confused. Guys, the OP has to post fact support before it can be fact rebutted.The accuser has the burden of proof too.You made an assertion that you don't support, got called out, and now are unhappy you were called out.
Gotcha. So you could swat my assertion like a fly that Democrats agree on all significant issues, but you don't want to do that, you want me to list every issue and every Democrat and show you all have the same position. That seems like a perfectly reasonable request to you on the internet.
It would be SOOOO easy, but proving me wrong isn't something that really interests you. Sure it doesn't
I'm not confused at all. My first post was #311. kaz responded with an accusation. He has the burden of proof. I'll wait.Guys, the OP has to post fact support before it can be fact rebutted.
You have to give facts support for your assertions, kaz, before they can be fact rebutted. It's how it works.That you and bd tex between you can't think of any counter examples to that Democrats agree on every significant issue is the most clearly you could support what I said. That you wouldn't want to prove me wrong with how easily you claim you can do that is deafeningI want you to stop giving your assertions as if they mean anything by themselves, and start giving some actual support for your claims.
I'm not confused at all. My first post was #311. kaz responded with an accusation. He has the burden of proof. I'll wait.Guys, the OP has to post fact support before it can be fact rebutted.
Prove that. You can't. You hve lost, yet again.You have to give facts support for your assertions, kaz, before they can be fact rebutted. It's how it works.That you and bd tex between you can't think of any counter examples to that Democrats agree on every significant issue is the most clearly you could support what I said. That you wouldn't want to prove me wrong with how easily you claim you can do that is deafeningI want you to stop giving your assertions as if they mean anything by themselves, and start giving some actual support for your claims.
Fact: Between you, neither you nor BD tex can think of a single significant issue that Democrats disagree on
The thread is about Biden. You want to talk about TRUMP!.Biden is easily promoted and defend, while all the Trumpies can do is deflect.
Sigh. Your assertions are not facts.I'm not confused at all. My first post was #311. kaz responded with an accusation. He has the burden of proof. I'll wait.Guys, the OP has to post fact support before it can be fact rebutted.
The thread is about Biden. You want to talk about TRUMP!.Still can't defend or promote Trump without mentioning Biden.
Prove that. You can't. You hve lost, yet again.You have to give facts support for your assertions, kaz, before they can be fact rebutted. It's how it works.That you and bd tex between you can't think of any counter examples to that Democrats agree on every significant issue is the most clearly you could support what I said. That you wouldn't want to prove me wrong with how easily you claim you can do that is deafeningI want you to stop giving your assertions as if they mean anything by themselves, and start giving some actual support for your claims.
Fact: Between you, neither you nor BD tex can think of a single significant issue that Democrats disagree on
Trump is the counter to biden, as you well know. Why are you so worried about mentioning Trump: you know he is going to lose.The thread is about Biden. You want to talk about TRUMP!.Still can't defend or promote Trump without mentioning Biden.