GaryDog
Gold Member
- Feb 10, 2016
- 4,369
- 530
- 195
What exactly is the assumption or definition of fact here?
We are in the age of information.
There must be a distinction between fact and perception.
Although perceptions are always true, facts are not.
Perceptions will concern the individual only, therefore are always true to the individual. They have origin in the individual's past, they proceed into the individual's future.
That's the reason for which we have psychiatric wards. Because it is possible that an individual will be convinced to the extreme that his perception is the same as fact, willing to prove by force that no other fact is supportive of no other perception.
Facts are enterprises, often presented first in a blueprint or planned possibility, and then continued and established upon the verification of benefits for necessarily inclusive and including perspectives, or otherwise discontinued at their blueprint stage, upon the verification that there are no benefits for necessarily inclusive and including perspectives.
Empirical data is what constitutes of perception, always true to the individual by the influence of his, her or their imagination.
Empirical data cannot establish facts, but facts can only be initiated through empirical data.
People have different empirical experiences, which explains why people have different empirical preferences and is the reason why no person should be offended by an opinion or by an honest expression of their perception.
A fact, however, is when after those perceptions have been captured into descriptions to be expressed and opinionated they may or may not proceed into enterprises through collaboration or decline of other individuals with their own and unique perceptions and preferences so their experiences may be improved or guarded.
LOL facts are ALWAYS true. Interpretation of facts can of course lead to trouble, but that doesn't change the truth. Facts are facts.
How about global climate change, and man's effects on it? What's your "feeling" there? What are the facts?
I don't do feelings. I do facts
The fact is the global climate changes. The fact is it is pretty obvious that 8B human beings would have some affect on that change. The question is "how much?" The bullshit is "Climate change is a bigger danger than terrorism"
LMAO, thanks for confirming what I already knew. The death/displacement/injury count that can be attributed to global climate change (including spread of disease, displacement due to rising seas, heat, flooding, greater intensity of storms, etc.) positively DWARFS deaths by terrorist attacks.
Because this is fun, let's try this again. What are your thoughts on Trump's claim that violent crime is overtaking the country right now?
See, your conclusions all come from feelings, not facts. You feel like what something we are doing is causing the spread of disease , etc , etc via climate change. But there are no facts to support this. None.
And you FEEL like we could do something to prevent same, but again there are no facts that suggest we can.. NONE
Liberals are silly, you believe in evolution, but don't believe the Earth itself can evolve to deal with what humans may or may not add to climate change.
And WTF does evolution have to do with any of this? Earth itself will be fine, and no one ever said it wouldn't. It's human beings and other animals on the planet that will likely die off in huge numbers precisely because we CAN'T adapt to the change in climate.
Sounds like you don't even know how evolution works. "Earth" is not an organism.