Arizona Judge Rejects Kari Lake’s Effort to Overturn Her Election Loss

No you didn't...so who is majority leader when the new session convened Jaunary 3rd, 2021. Someone has to be the leader of the Senate majority at that time.
Mitch McConnell was majority leader on January 3rd, and he held on to it by stalling, until Jan20, 2021.

By his stalling, he was able to put off the impeachment from the house, until after Trump left office. If Schumer had been given the reigns immediately after Warnock and Oscoff won, then the senate would have had the impeachment trial, when it was sent to the Senate, before trump left.
 
First of all, you calling anyone an idiot is about as credible as our FBI or DoJ telling us the truth. Second the majority people believe 2020 was stolen. Third, people like you know it was stolen and do not care. You want to be where you are. You want this country destroyed. Your posts prove it as you ridicule anyone who wants election integrity. The assholes you support do nothing but abuse the power the people gave them.

How do you live with your disgusting self?

What else can any normal person call you but an idiot. In this post alone, you insanely claim "the majority people believe 2020 was stolen," AFTER YOU just posted a poll saying 24% of those polled strongly believe the election was stolen and another 16% somewhat believe it was stolen. Even combined, that's still not north of 50%, which is what a "majority" actually is.

If you're going to bitch and moan at others for calling you an idiot, you should at least try to offer lucid posts.
 
An expert testified it had to be. Why don't other experts than yours qualify as experts?

LOL

You idiot, he testified it had to be intentional in that someone had to select 'shrink to fit.' He never testified that it was intentional misconduct, which is what Lake had to prove.

You truly are out of your fucking mind. :cuckoo:
 
An expert testified it had to be. Why don't other experts than yours qualify as experts?
The so called expert's testimony in court FAILED to prove there was any fraud by any person. The judge said speculating or projecting, simply does not suffice under Arizona election law.....evidence and facts are what does count, which he had none.
 
What else can any normal person call you but an idiot. In this post alone, you insanely claim "the majority people believe 2020 was stolen," AFTER YOU just posted a poll saying 24% of those polled strongly believe the election was stolen and another 16% somewhat believe it was stolen. Even combined, that's still not north of 50%, which is what a "majority" actually is.

If you're going to bitch and moan at others for calling you an idiot, you should at least try to offer lucid posts.
My posts are lucid. That I am dealing with a gloating troll might have something to do with your opinion.
 
The so called expert's testimony in court FAILED to prove there was any fraud by any person. The judge said speculating or projecting, simply does not suffice under Arizona election law.....evidence and facts are what does count, which he had none.
And those laws come from a corrupted legislature no doubt through intimidation or bribery.
 
Mitch McConnell was majority leader on January 3rd, and he held on to it by stalling, until Jan20, 2021.

By his stalling, he was able to put off the impeachment from the house, until after Trump left office. If Schumer had been given the reigns immediately after Warnock and Oscoff won, then the senate would have had the impeachment trial, when it was sent to the Senate, before trump left.
That's how the Senates rules are written.
 
Ok bucky, how does that constitute "Fraud". Intentional "Fraud" at that.

Thank for playing Completely Clueless
Because it assured the ballots would be rejected. After that anything could happen to them.
 
You're just upset that the stolen election conspiracy theory is going nowhere.

Sucks for you.
Funny you mention that. The dreaded Glenn Beck had a recording of Joe Biden bragging about how they 'won' the election through a conglomerate on social media, corporations and so on. Everything he was bragging about is now being revealed in Twitter dumps.

Heard it in the car and haven't been able to find it.

Now they're stealing from the RW fascist playbook.....Eww that hurts.

Forcible suppression of opposition, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.
 
My posts are lucid. That I am dealing with a gloating troll might have something to do with your opinion.

LOLOL

If your posts were lucid, you wouldn't be calling 40% a "majority." You wouldn't be claiming there was election fraud since you haven't proven election fraud in over 2 years and counting.
 
Funny you mention that. The dreaded Glenn Beck had a recording of Joe Biden bragging about how they 'won' the election through a conglomerate on social media, corporations and so on. Everything he was bragging about is now being revealed in Twitter dumps.

Heard it in the car and haven't been able to find it.

Now they're stealing from the RW fascist playbook.....Eww that hurts.

Forcible suppression of opposition, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation and race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.
You lost, crybaby. Your conspiracy theorist nonsense doesn’t change that. :itsok:
 
Because it assured the ballots would be rejected. After that anything could happen to them.

Trying understand the logic.

Which person and /persons unknown insured that these smaller ballots would be issued to just one county in Arizona?

Which person/and or persons unknown knew when send these ballots to jst on county in Arizoan?

Which person/and or persons unknown aarrange for these ballots to be shipped to just one county in Arizona?

Which person/and persons unkown decided create these ballots and when?

Which person/and or persons unknown insured the ballots would be delivered to just one county in Arizona?

When believing an obsolutely unbelievabe half assed conspiracy, get you facts first.
 
They sure protected the rioters with lie's and then they scoffed at the threat's to our highest court judge's.. Why ? Because they wanted that intimidation to stick. Well it worked, because right on down the line rulings are being ruled in the most unbelievable ridiculous ways these days. You are right that it's all been about intimidation.
The ruling wasn't ridiculous, it clearly and concisely, followed Arizona election law....

You wouldn't know that, because you haven't spent the time to read it, like everyone else in the Trumper/Lake club. :(
 

Forum List

Back
Top