Art of the Deal: So Much Winning Edition

Someday Trump and his idiot supporters may learn that inflicting pain on others doesn’t mean that you win.
Winning for the Trumpist is a very, very, very, very low bar.
how you figure that? give an example of being a low bar.

The trump myth that tariffs on Mexican products means Mexico is paying for the border wall for starters.
That somehow ripping kids away from their parents means you’re being “strong” when in reality, you’re just being cruel.
well, hmmmm let's see. the myth is that the tariffs will pay for the wall. too funny, but nice myth.

illegals murdering children of parents is less important to leftists than detaining a criminal who entered our country illegally. hmmmm talk about low, your value of life is in the rabbit hole below ground level. that's how low you all go.
 
Someday Trump and his idiot supporters may learn that inflicting pain on others doesn’t mean that you win.
what's your pain?

side hurts…it’s from laughing at you guys.
so you can't answer, go figure.

Looks like I did answer. You responded to the answer. Perhaps you don’t know what the definition of an answer is or the context of what you originally replied to (I was talking about our trading partners dumbass).
Go figure.
yes you did, if that's all your pain is, that sounds like happy pain. So, you're thanking us?
 
Someday Trump and his idiot supporters may learn that inflicting pain on others doesn’t mean that you win.
Winning for the Trumpist is a very, very, very, very low bar.
how you figure that? give an example of being a low bar.

The trump myth that tariffs on Mexican products means Mexico is paying for the border wall for starters.
That somehow ripping kids away from their parents means you’re being “strong” when in reality, you’re just being cruel.
well, hmmmm let's see. the myth is that the tariffs will pay for the wall. too funny, but nice myth.

illegals murdering children of parents is less important to leftists than detaining a criminal who entered our country illegally. hmmmm talk about low, your value of life is in the rabbit hole below ground level. that's how low you all go.

According to sources, you’re more likely to be killed by your clothing than an illegal so yours is an inaccurate and not surprisingly stupid viewpoint
 
Someday Trump and his idiot supporters may learn that inflicting pain on others doesn’t mean that you win.
what's your pain?

side hurts…it’s from laughing at you guys.
so you can't answer, go figure.

Looks like I did answer. You responded to the answer. Perhaps you don’t know what the definition of an answer is or the context of what you originally replied to (I was talking about our trading partners dumbass).
Go figure.
yes you did, if that's all your pain is, that sounds like happy pain. So, you're thanking us?

Give it some thought shit brains
 
We have a trade surplus with Canada. Don't fix what isn't broken.
 
No and no.

MAGA!

So why would Canada lift their protective tariffs if we will not end our protective subsidies

And yes, Mexico will not go it alone without Canada


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com



“If for any reason the government of Canada and the United States do not reach an agreement, we already know that there will still be a deal between Mexico and the United States.”

~ Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray (link)

And there president elect said that this is just the first step and he wants Canada in any final agreement.

Also, will Congress approve the deal if it leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Canada can join the deal, why do you think our congress has a right to force Canada to do anything?

Our congress would not be forcing anyone to do anything. If Trump submits a trade agreement that leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states, will congress approve it? Seems unlikely


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Dufus thinks Trump is going to inititiate a trade embargo on Canada.
 
In order for Canada to join the U.S. Mexico deal they would need to:
  • (1) eliminate soft-wood subsidies in the lumber sector;
  • (2) eliminate protectionist tariffs in the AG (Dairy) sector;
  • (3) accept the 75% rules of origin, eliminating the NAFTA loophole;
  • (4) agree to the enforcement mechanisms for all the above;
  • (5) allow U.S. banks to operate in Canada (financial sector).
Each of these five issues, now locked-in and agreed by the U.S. and Mexico are “take-it-or-leave-it” terms for Canada to join. There’s almost no-way, given the politicization of the Canadian plan, for Justin and Chrystia to agree to those terms and keep their fragmented political support base appeased.

Therefore, absent total acquiescence, it is likely Canada will keep their soft-wood lumber subsidies, keep their protectionist Dairy tariffs, keep their banking rules blocking U.S. access, and face a 25% duty on U.S. auto imports – effectively destroying their auto manufacturing sector. Car companies (ex. Toyota) will simply leave Canada and return to building/assembling in the U.S.

Justin from Canada Painted His Country Into a Lose/Lose Trade Corner – More Details of U.S-Mexico Deal…

Still not tired. MAGA.

The above moron gets ALL his "facts" from...........lol

The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse)

right061.png
RIGHT BIAS
What else did Mother Jones feed you?
 
Except that Mexico has stated they will not do tweak to NAFTA without Canada onboard.

Also, if Canada lifts their tariffs on dairy products does that mean we will stop subsiding our dairy farmers to the tune of 70% of their income?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No and no.

MAGA!

So why would Canada lift their protective tariffs if we will not end our protective subsidies

And yes, Mexico will not go it alone without Canada


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com



“If for any reason the government of Canada and the United States do not reach an agreement, we already know that there will still be a deal between Mexico and the United States.”

~ Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray (link)

And there president elect said that this is just the first step and he wants Canada in any final agreement.

Also, will Congress approve the deal if it leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Canada can join the deal, why do you think our congress has a right to force Canada to do anything?
He lied about Mexico because it pisses him off America is winning.
 
In order for Canada to join the U.S. Mexico deal they would need to:
  • (1) eliminate soft-wood subsidies in the lumber sector;
  • (2) eliminate protectionist tariffs in the AG (Dairy) sector;
  • (3) accept the 75% rules of origin, eliminating the NAFTA loophole;
  • (4) agree to the enforcement mechanisms for all the above;
  • (5) allow U.S. banks to operate in Canada (financial sector).
Each of these five issues, now locked-in and agreed by the U.S. and Mexico are “take-it-or-leave-it” terms for Canada to join. There’s almost no-way, given the politicization of the Canadian plan, for Justin and Chrystia to agree to those terms and keep their fragmented political support base appeased.

Therefore, absent total acquiescence, it is likely Canada will keep their soft-wood lumber subsidies, keep their protectionist Dairy tariffs, keep their banking rules blocking U.S. access, and face a 25% duty on U.S. auto imports – effectively destroying their auto manufacturing sector. Car companies (ex. Toyota) will simply leave Canada and return to building/assembling in the U.S.

Justin from Canada Painted His Country Into a Lose/Lose Trade Corner – More Details of U.S-Mexico Deal…

Still not tired. MAGA.

The above moron gets ALL his "facts" from...........lol

The Last Refuge (Conservative Treehouse)

right061.png
RIGHT BIAS
What else did Mother Jones feed you?
You mean DailyCOSSACK..
 
Someday Trump and his idiot supporters may learn that inflicting pain on others doesn’t mean that you win.
Winning for the Trumpist is a very, very, very, very low bar.
how you figure that? give an example of being a low bar.

The trump myth that tariffs on Mexican products means Mexico is paying for the border wall for starters.
That somehow ripping kids away from their parents means you’re being “strong” when in reality, you’re just being cruel.
well, hmmmm let's see. the myth is that the tariffs will pay for the wall. too funny, but nice myth.

illegals murdering children of parents is less important to leftists than detaining a criminal who entered our country illegally. hmmmm talk about low, your value of life is in the rabbit hole below ground level. that's how low you all go.

According to sources, you’re more likely to be killed by your clothing than an illegal so yours is an inaccurate and not surprisingly stupid viewpoint
tell that to Mollie and all of the other murdered girls of illegals. I'm sure they'll give you a sweet kiss for that information.

BTW, talk about myths!!!!
 
Winning for the Trumpist is a very, very, very, very low bar.
how you figure that? give an example of being a low bar.

The trump myth that tariffs on Mexican products means Mexico is paying for the border wall for starters.
That somehow ripping kids away from their parents means you’re being “strong” when in reality, you’re just being cruel.
well, hmmmm let's see. the myth is that the tariffs will pay for the wall. too funny, but nice myth.

illegals murdering children of parents is less important to leftists than detaining a criminal who entered our country illegally. hmmmm talk about low, your value of life is in the rabbit hole below ground level. that's how low you all go.

According to sources, you’re more likely to be killed by your clothing than an illegal so yours is an inaccurate and not surprisingly stupid viewpoint
tell that to Mollie and all of the other murdered girls of illegals. I'm sure they'll give you a sweet kiss for that information.

BTW, talk about myths!!!!
Can’t even enjoy a walk on the pier with friends without an illegal shooting you thru the heart and the left letting the murderer walk free.
 
how you figure that? give an example of being a low bar.

The trump myth that tariffs on Mexican products means Mexico is paying for the border wall for starters.
That somehow ripping kids away from their parents means you’re being “strong” when in reality, you’re just being cruel.
well, hmmmm let's see. the myth is that the tariffs will pay for the wall. too funny, but nice myth.

illegals murdering children of parents is less important to leftists than detaining a criminal who entered our country illegally. hmmmm talk about low, your value of life is in the rabbit hole below ground level. that's how low you all go.

According to sources, you’re more likely to be killed by your clothing than an illegal so yours is an inaccurate and not surprisingly stupid viewpoint
tell that to Mollie and all of the other murdered girls of illegals. I'm sure they'll give you a sweet kiss for that information.

BTW, talk about myths!!!!
Can’t even enjoy a walk on the pier with friends without an illegal shooting you thru the heart and the left letting the murderer walk free.
it's that rabid clothing she wore.
 
So why would Canada lift their protective tariffs if we will not end our protective subsidies

And yes, Mexico will not go it alone without Canada


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com



“If for any reason the government of Canada and the United States do not reach an agreement, we already know that there will still be a deal between Mexico and the United States.”

~ Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray (link)

And there president elect said that this is just the first step and he wants Canada in any final agreement.

Also, will Congress approve the deal if it leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Canada can join the deal, why do you think our congress has a right to force Canada to do anything?

Our congress would not be forcing anyone to do anything. If Trump submits a trade agreement that leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states, will congress approve it? Seems unlikely


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Dufus thinks Trump is going to inititiate a trade embargo on Canada.

Love it when you statist run out of talking points and just start making shit up out of thin air.

It is a true sign of your surrender


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 


“If for any reason the government of Canada and the United States do not reach an agreement, we already know that there will still be a deal between Mexico and the United States.”

~ Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray (link)

And there president elect said that this is just the first step and he wants Canada in any final agreement.

Also, will Congress approve the deal if it leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Canada can join the deal, why do you think our congress has a right to force Canada to do anything?

Our congress would not be forcing anyone to do anything. If Trump submits a trade agreement that leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states, will congress approve it? Seems unlikely


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Dufus thinks Trump is going to inititiate a trade embargo on Canada.

Love it when you statist run out of talking points and just start making shit up out of thin air.

It is a true sign of your surrender


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Tell us more about Mexico not entering a deal without Canada, Dufus.
 
Things are looking good.

I sure hope things go smoothly, only question I have is wondering what it would be worth to Canada to engage in a game of chicken? If we immediately slap a 25% tariff on their automobiles, the mass layoffs would not only hit Canadian auto manufacturing, but also US parts suppliers that send components to their plants. I would normally brush this aside but with midterm elections coming up, can Canada afford to be cocky?
 
And there president elect said that this is just the first step and he wants Canada in any final agreement.

Also, will Congress approve the deal if it leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Canada can join the deal, why do you think our congress has a right to force Canada to do anything?

Our congress would not be forcing anyone to do anything. If Trump submits a trade agreement that leaves out the biggest trading partner for 72% of the states, will congress approve it? Seems unlikely


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Dufus thinks Trump is going to inititiate a trade embargo on Canada.

Love it when you statist run out of talking points and just start making shit up out of thin air.

It is a true sign of your surrender


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Tell us more about Mexico not entering a deal without Canada, Dufus.

Gutierrez, the president elect said that this was just the first step and that Canada needed to be included in the final deal.

Do try and keep up, instead of just making up lies about me.

Fucking statist are a pack of liars


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Perhaps I missed it. Where was the part about the American Auto industry hiring more workers? All I saw in reference to that was that the wages must be $16 an hour; not what nation they are going to be in. Seems like this would raise the price of cars.
 
Perhaps I missed it. Where was the part about the American Auto industry hiring more workers? All I saw in reference to that was that the wages must be $16 an hour; not what nation they are going to be in. Seems like this would raise the price of cars.
you know, i thought people were against sweatshops? I guess you're for em. I could tell you the rationality of that, but then you wouldn't get it. sweat shop should be your key though.
 
Perhaps I missed it. Where was the part about the American Auto industry hiring more workers? All I saw in reference to that was that the wages must be $16 an hour; not what nation they are going to be in. Seems like this would raise the price of cars.
you know, i thought people were against sweatshops?
I am.

I guess you’re for em.
Well, you’re known to all as a fucking idiot so you guessed wrong.


Is there anything that brings the automobile manufacturing jobs back to the US in this agreement?
 

Forum List

Back
Top