Artic ice at a 30 year high

[tyroneweaver]

yet libs continue to scare the bejesus out of kids to the point of anxiety attacks over climate change.

Inconvenient truth for globalists: Arctic ice at 30-year high | WND | by Art Moore

The World Economic Forum and the globalist movement it helps lead have used the "climate crisis" and the COVID-19 pandemic as pretexts for measures to redistribute the wealth of nations. But this week, as WEF convenes is annual conference in Davos, Switzerland, the Arctic sea ice expanse so far...

www.wnd.com

 

[Vrenn]

yet libs continue to scare the bejesus out of kids to the point of anxiety attacks over climate change.

Inconvenient truth for globalists: Arctic ice at 30-year high | WND | by Art Moore

The World Economic Forum and the globalist movement it helps lead have used the "climate crisis" and the COVID-19 pandemic as pretexts for measures to redistribute the wealth of nations. But this week, as WEF convenes is annual conference in Davos, Switzerland, the Arctic sea ice expanse so far...

www.wnd.com

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

 

[Orangecat]

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

 

[cnm]

yet libs continue to scare the bejesus out of kids to the point of anxiety attacks over climate change.

Inconvenient truth for globalists: Arctic ice at 30-year high | WND | by Art Moore

The World Economic Forum and the globalist movement it helps lead have used the "climate crisis" and the COVID-19 pandemic as pretexts for measures to redistribute the wealth of nations. But this week, as WEF convenes is annual conference in Davos, Switzerland, the Arctic sea ice expanse so far...

www.wnd.com

Woo hoo. No worries then.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

 

[Muhammed]

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

I see. So you are tacitly admitting that you are too stupid to think for yourself. In other words, you are a typical low IQ LWNJ moonbat. Aka, a Democrat.

You're a stupid and therefore easily brainwashed dupe.

 

[Vrenn]

I see. So you are tacitly admitting that you are too stupid to think for yourself. In other words, you are a typical low IQ LWNJ moonbat. Aka, a Democrat.

You're a stupid and therefore easily brainwashed dupe.

I'm not the one accepting information from known liars as facts and then religiously supporting it. I go with science not science fiction.

 

[Muhammed]

I'm not the one accepting information from known liars as facts and then religiously supporting it. I go with science not science fiction.

Could you explain to the USMB forum, the convoluted reasoning you used to come to the ridiculous conclusion that you "go with science not science fiction"?

You sound like a typical extremely religious ACGW doomsday cult dupe.

 

[2aguy]

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Moron....they are reporting on a story from an actual source........

 

[j-mac]

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts

“Media Bias Fact Check,” a media outlet that claims to be “dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices,” is either inept or dishonest.

www.justfactsdaily.com

 

[Mac1958]

World Net Daily (WND)

I remember, back before Escalator Day, we used to call sites like WND and Breitbart and Alex Jones "fake news" here.

Now, for these people, they're The Truth.

 

[j-mac]

I remember, back before Escalator Day, we used to call sites like WND and Breitbart and Alex Jones "fake news" here.

Now, for these people, they're The Truth.

And no leftist site is questionable to you, right?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I'm not the one accepting information from known liars as facts and then religiously supporting it. I go with science not science fiction.

Your science has been caught countless times fudging data

 

[LeftofLeft]

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

If those same “We” are rating WND with a low credibility rating yet have the opposite or no rating for MSNBC and CNN, then they are in no position of credibility themselves.

 

[Burgermeister]

​

World Net Daily (WND)​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate WND Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

I am also skeptical of the data sources here, the Danish Meteorological Institute and the OSI SAF.

 

[AMart]

That's impossible all of the ice melted and NYC is under water.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That's impossible all of the ice melted and NYC is under water.

That was supposed to happen two decades ago

 

[AMart]

That was supposed to happen two decades ago

And if there really was bad artic ice loss, and no global flooding has occurred, welp.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

And if there really was bad artic ice loss, and no global flooding has occurred, welp.

It's a huge wealth redistribution scheme

 

[j-mac]

It's a huge wealth redistribution scheme

I wonder how many remember the carbon credit exchange in Chicago, put together by Al Gore?