TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Sep 21, 2012
- 62,631
- 10,096
Answer to what? We all have opinions. You want me to validate yours?OkayWhat merits? You think it’s icky? That’s not a “merit.”You think that was some kind of dig at you? Get over yourself. That was to celebrate a group of people that finally won their right to pursue happiness.
Next you’re probably going to ask if Obama saying that a black person’s life matters is disrespectful to you rubes.![]()
My issue with obergfell wan't the gay marriage part but the forcing of the States that don't want it to issue them by force.
However unlike you I understand some people oppose gay marriage on the merits. Now tell me how lighting up the white house in the rainbow flag, supposedly ALL the people's house" is respecting those people?![]()
No i see no constitutional basis for forcing States to modify their marriage contract requirements vis a vis SSM.
When NY legislated SSM I was all for it. If Obergfell forced all States to recognize SSM licenses (under full faith and credit) from States that issued them voluntarily I would have been for it.![]()
No answer?
But going back to your original beef, I don't have the condescending asshole view of people of faith, and I don't go out of my way to insult said people.
Progressives on the other hand find insulting people they disagree with to be a default position.
You voted for a President who’s default position is to insult people. You can’t complain about that anymore.